「lens」の検索結果

Survey one surface of tdmcp (artist controls, library/packaging, CLI/DX, AI/LLM, or TouchDesigner depth) for candidate NEW features — inventory what exists, cross-check the roadmap, apply the gap-finding lenses, vet each idea, and emit a structured, novelty- and confidence-labelled candidate list to _workspace/discovery/. Use when a td-surveyor agent is scouting a surface during the feature-discovery harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for conducting Torres-style story-based interviews with the people whose experience you're researching, with bias mitigation and a JTBD lens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an answer is wanted from one named seat only: breaking, business, career, codebase, human, impact, innovation, moat, rent-seeking, skeptic, or stability. Not for multi-lens synthesis: use prism. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content angle generator for turning dry expert topics into high-engagement infotainment. Applies 7 journalistic angle types (Myth vs Reality, Paradox, Level Error, Price of Solution, Conditions, Hidden Driver, Contrary Thesis) + historical/future lens + news-hook framing. Use when experts need their content to become interesting rather than just informative - blog posts, video scripts, social content, newsletters, landing pages, ad hooks. For any niche: B2B, B2C, services, products, personal brand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Consumer Culture Theory to analyze consumption as a cultural practice shaped by identity, marketplace cultures, and ideology. Use this skill when the user needs to interpret consumer behavior through cultural lenses, analyze brand communities or subcultures of consumption, decode marketplace ideologies, or when they ask 'why do consumers behave this way culturally', 'what does this consumption mean', or 'how does identity shape buying'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a dispensing optician — translating a written prescription into a fitted pair of glasses, resolving frame/lens material tradeoffs, diagnosing why a finished pair doesn't feel or see right, or deciding whether a fit problem is remake, adjustment, or patient-adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a dual-lens critical review of the specification and plan from both product strategy and engineering risk perspectives before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a monthly money check-in with an AI assistant: categorize spending, spot leaks, set one savings target, and view it through the 50/30/20 lens — judgment-free. Use once a month to stay aware of where your money goes. General educational information, not financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research what people are actually saying about a topic in the last 30 days across Reddit, X / Twitter, YouTube, Hacker News, dev.to, Medium, and other public discourse platforms. API-free; uses WebSearch with platform-targeted site operators plus recency filters. Produces DISCOURSE.md (a structured brief) and JSON output the writer can consume. Complements blog-researcher (which focuses on authority sources) with a recency-and-engagement lens. Use when user says "blog discourse", "discourse research", "what are people saying about", "research what people are saying", "voice of customer", "social listening", "30-day research", "trend research", "what's the discussion on", "real-time research", "practitioner discourse", "/blog discourse".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Snapchat Ads measurement, Snap Pixel and Conversions API, mobile and app campaigns, creative, AR and catalog formats, audiences, budgets, brand safety, and reporting. Use for Snapchat Ads, Snap Ads, Snap Pixel, Snapchat Conversions API, AR Lens ads, app-install campaigns, or Snapchat dynamic product ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the executive KPI dashboard for Agentforce: adoption, deflection, latency, cost, quality — KPI definitions, data sources, CRM Analytics lenses, alert thresholds. NOT for the platform's own session tracing, Agent Analytics and health monitoring — use agentforce/agentforce-observability. NOT for scoring agent answer quality offline — use agentforce/agentforce-eval-harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when prioritizing a Salesforce backlog with the MoSCoW method (Must / Should / Could / Won't) plus an effort + value lens, deciding what fits in the next sprint or release, and using WSJF as a tie-break when MoSCoW alone produces ties. Trigger keywords: MoSCoW prioritization, must should could won't, WSJF salesforce, prioritize salesforce stories, sprint commit, backlog grooming. NOT for story writing or splitting (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for release train planning (use agents/release-train-planner). NOT for sizing/estimation method debates — this skill assumes a sizing convention is already in place.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to elicit, document, and validate CRM Analytics requirements — covering data source mapping (Salesforce object sync vs external connector vs Data Cloud), transformation needs, audience-specific lens or dashboard views, and drill-down path specifications — before any dataset or dashboard is built. Trigger keywords: CRM Analytics requirements, analytics data source mapping, CRM Analytics audience requirements, analytics visualization requirements. NOT for the formula and target behind each KPI — use admin/analytics-kpi-definition. NOT for building the dashboard once requirements are agreed — use admin/analytics-dashboard-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when driving adoption of CRM Analytics (Einstein Analytics) across an org — the Analytics Adoption App for measuring who uses which dashboards, embedding analytics into Lightning pages, pinning dashboards to the Analytics home page, self-service personas, and analytics success metrics. Triggers: analytics adoption, dashboard usage tracking, embedded analytics strategy, self-service analytics enablement, CRM Analytics rollout. NOT for building the dashboards — use admin/analytics-dashboard-design. NOT for the app, datasets and lenses — use admin/crm-analytics-app-creation. NOT for non-analytics rollout training — use admin/change-management-and-training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Timeboxed ideation on a topic where lens-driven proposers generate structurally different ideas, blind critics cull them, and pairwise judges rank the survivors on a tournament ladder instead of 1-10 scores, evolving the leaders until the clock runs out. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, discover features, generate options, or think through possibilities for a specified duration. Triggers on requests like "brainstorm X for 30 minutes", "ideate on X", "spend an hour thinking about X", "what features should we build", "explore options for X". Not for executing a task over time (timeboxed-iterating) or optimizing a measurable metric (autoresearch).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cold-start brownfield reconnaissance — reconstruct the WHOLE game design from an existing codebase when there is no GDD yet. Optionally accepts a free-text game description, notes, or reference links to guide and enrich the scan. Use when the user wants to build the game design from the code, e.g. "create a GDD from this codebase", "reconstruct the design from our code — it's a roguelike deck-builder", "build a design doc from the existing project, here are some refs". Scans the project (engine auto-detected), extracts a system roster + dependency graph and content-type schemas / resources / entities into one passive .unikit/gamedesign/RECON.md, tags every fact provenance:extracted-from-code, and writes a mandatory Intent Gap for what code cannot know (pillars, fantasy, the "why"). Writes nothing else and calls no skill. STRICTLY whole-project cold-start — if a GDD already exists and the user wants a specific part investigated, use /unikit-gd-explore (code lens); to author the GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Problem redefinition before problem solving. Takes a stated problem, extracts its premises, then spawns reframers applying different lenses (problem-vs-symptom, scope-shift, stakeholder-shift, level-of-abstraction, time-horizon, inversion, category-shift, constraints-shift) in isolation, and synthesizes the alternatives into a report with an orchestrator recommendation. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrospective learning from a completed experience. Takes a project, incident, decision that played out, or time period; gathers ground truth (observations) separately from recollections; spawns reflectors applying different lenses (what-worked-vs-got-lucky, what-didn't, what-surprised, system-rewards-vs-intent, decisions-that-aged, what-to-tell-past-self, patterns-that-recur) in isolation; synthesizes into updated mental models as first-class output. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Good-faith adversarial scrutiny of an idea or plan. Spawns critical skeptics across relevant lenses, pairs them with an advocate defending the idea, and synthesizes the exchange into a report. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abductive reasoning about causes. Takes a phenomenon, separates observations from interpretations, then spawns diagnosticians applying different reasoning lenses (technical, human-factors, process, incentive-structure, environmental, temporal, measurement-artifact, statistical) in isolation. Orchestrator evaluates candidate causes for fit-against-evidence, calibrates confidence honestly, and reports leading candidate(s) with distinguishing evidence needed. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help founders evaluate business decisions through the lens of sustainable, profitable growth. Use when discussing spending, hiring, fundraising, pricing, or scaling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review any business decision, plan, or strategy through the minimalist entrepreneur lens. Use to gut-check decisions, simplify approaches, or evaluate options using core principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。