「panel」の検索結果

Calls microsatellite instability from WES/WGS/targeted-panel with MSIsensor, MSIsensor-pro, MSIsensor-ct (panel-aware), mSINGS, and MANTIS for FDA pembrolizumab MSI-H pan-tumor / Lynch syndrome / dMMR ICI biomarker. Use when stratifying ICI eligibility (Le 2015), pairing MSI with TMB-H (Sha 2020 / Salem 2018), screening Lynch syndrome (universal IHC + MSI), or distinguishing MSI-H tumors from POLE-exo hypermutator with overlapping signatures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Treats a ctDNA assay as a molecule-counting experiment at the Poisson edge and builds its analytical-validation case the measurement-science way. Covers the genome-equivalent currency (~330 haploid copies/ng), the lambda = input_GE x VAF sampling ceiling (lambda>=3 for ~95% detection), the error-suppression ladder (raw NGS ~1e-3 -> single-strand UMI ~1e-4/1e-5 -> duplex <1e-7), the CLSI EP17 LoB/LoD/LoD95/LoQ framework, the per-locus-vs-panel-integrated LoD distinction that lets bespoke MRD reach ppm, contrived/SEQC2 reference standards, and honest LoD reporting conditioned on input mass + consensus depth + replicate detection rate. Use when stating or trusting a sensitivity claim, designing a dilution-series validation, deciding how many genome equivalents are needed at a target VAF, choosing a single-locus vs panel-integrated LoD, or auditing a "detects 0.1% VAF" claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics de produto — PostHog, Mixpanel, eventos, funnels, cohorts, retencao, north star metric, OKRs e dashboards de produto.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill for the Panels area of paddock. 727 symbols across 76 files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics de produto — PostHog, Mixpanel, eventos, funnels, cohorts, retencao, north star metric, OKRs e dashboards de produto.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work the review of a research run with rs_review — read the manuscript and record the panel's concerns with the evidence that grounds each one, keep the author's reply and the re-review's finding in their separate columns, run the devil's advocate with the concession threshold the tool enforces, and write the panel report and traceability matrix a response-to-reviewers letter is built from. Use when a document is ready for review, when a concern has to be answered or re-reviewed, or when an attack or a concession is being recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT structured interview scorecard from a job description: five to eight competencies traced to it, past-behaviour and situational evidence questions with probes, four-level rating anchors written as observable behaviours, a blank scoring sheet, a panel plan and the items the hiring manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an interview scorecard for this job description", "write competency questions for this role", "draft the interview guide for the panel", "set up a rating scale for the interviewers", "put together a structured interview kit" or "create a hiring rubric from the JD". Do not use for writing or fixing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for the new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-tests one message (email, announcement, intranet post, town hall script, customer notice or slide) against two to six role personas the user supplies and returns a DRAFT panel report: each persona's likely first reaction, objections, unanswered questions, misreadings and what they would do next, every point tied to the passage that triggers it, plus suggested edits that add no fact the message does not already hold. Use when the user asks to "pre-test this message", "how will the team read this", "run this past the personas", "what objections will this raise", "find the holes before I send" or "check this lands with managers and field staff". Do not use for an in-character review of a proposal or business case by one executive archetype, use the executive-review family (cfo-reviewer, frontline-skeptic-reviewer and siblings) instead; to write the message in the first place, use announcement-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads two or more supplier, bid or tender responses against a requirements list and returns a DRAFT comparison pack: a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps per supplier, clarification questions and neutral observations, for an evaluation panel. Never scores, weights, ranks or recommends a winner; the award stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to "compare these bids", "matrix the tender responses against our requirements", "collate the RFQ replies", "show me where each supplier falls short" or "draft clarification questions for the bidders". Do not use for scoring or weighting against agreed criteria, use supplier-evaluation-matrix instead, or for writing the requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cursorで複雑な問いを、必要な探索・独立したコンテキストでの熟考・統合・十分性確認へ分けて考える。single/panelの方式を使い、親だけで熟考を完了させない。ユーザーが /deepthink と入力したときに使う。

難しい意思決定や論点を、必要な探索・独立したコンテキストでの熟考・統合・十分性確認へ分けて考える。single/panelの方式を使い、親だけで熟考を完了させない。調査はresearch、実装やbug修正はpir2/debugを使う。ユーザーが /deepthink と入力したときに使う。

Get a second opinion from an external LLM at three checkpoints: T1 is the plan valid, T2 which path at a fork, T3 finish plus a QA breaker that tries to break the result. One structured move per exchange (PROPOSE, COUNTER, VERIFY, ACCEPT, BLOCK) with memory across turns, and every exchange mirrored into a human-visible channel. Supports a multi-vendor panel instead of a single reviewer. Triggers: "/secondop", "get a second opinion", "run the review panel".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submission-grade remote-sensing Nature/high-impact journal figure workflow for Python or R. Use whenever the user asks to create, revise, audit, or polish manuscript figures, multi-panel scientific plots, map-led composites, remote-sensing image plates, sensor/product workflow figures, validation/error/uncertainty panels, or journal-ready SVG/PDF/TIFF outputs, especially for Nature-family, Remote Sensing of Environment, ISPRS, IEEE TGRS, or other high-impact venues. Before plotting, define the figure's conclusion, evidence logic, export needs, and review risks. If the user has not chosen Python or R, ask "Python or R?" and stop. Use only the selected backend for figure generation, previewing, exporting, and QA. Supports matplotlib/seaborn and ggplot2/patchwork/ComplexHeatmap. Not for dashboards or Illustrator/Figma-first infographics. Also trigger on general academic-writing figure needs even without the word "Nature", such as making figures/plots for a paper, scientific/academic plotting, data visualization for a manuscript, and Chinese phrasings like 遥感论文配图、学术写作配图、科研绘图、科研作图、地图出图、论文图表、可视化.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill alongside figma-use when the task involves translating an application page, view, or multi-section layout into Figma. Triggers: 'write to Figma', 'create in Figma from code', 'push page to Figma', 'take this app/page and build it in Figma', 'create a screen', 'build a landing page in Figma', 'update the Figma screen to match code', 'convert this modal/dialog/drawer/panel to Figma'. This is the preferred workflow skill whenever the user wants to build or update a full page, modal, dialog, drawer, sidebar, panel, or any composed multi-section view in Figma from code or a description. Discovers design system components, variables, and styles from Code Connect files, existing screens, and library search, then imports them and assembles views incrementally section-by-section using design system tokens instead of hardcoded values.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics Specialist IA — Expert en analytics (GA4, Mixpanel, Amplitude, event tracking, dashboards).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics de produto — PostHog, Mixpanel, eventos, funnels, cohorts, retencao, north star metric, OKRs e dashboards de produto.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics de produto — PostHog, Mixpanel, eventos, funnels, cohorts, retencao, north star metric, OKRs e dashboards de produto.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates Nano Banana Pro prompts for 4-panel engineer humor comics. Use when user mentions "漫画作成", "エンジニア漫画", "4コマ", or "あるある".

Use this skill whenever helping someone build, design, or troubleshoot layouts in Elementor Pro V4 using the visual editor. Triggers on ANY mention of Elementor, page builder, Flexbox widget, Div block, section layout, widget configuration, responsive breakpoints, dark mode, scroll animations, Interactions tab, Variables Manager, Class Manager, Custom Code snippets, or any visual design work inside the Elementor panel. Also trigger when someone asks how to position elements, set spacing, apply typography, configure dark mode, prevent FOUC, or build scroll-triggered effects in Elementor. ALWAYS use this skill before suggesting any Elementor V4 implementation — it contains critical V4-specific panel structure, common AI mistakes to avoid, and production-tested patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO + GEO (AI-search) + brand-entity desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) — wired to Google Search Console for a dashboard over search analytics and an agent-prepared SEO opportunities review queue, plus an AI-visibility tracker (are we cited in ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini / Claude / Copilot answers), a GEO content-optimization queue gated by geo-qa, and an entity / knowledge-panel readiness checklist. Use when the user invokes $kelly-seo or /kelly-seo, mentions SEO, Google Search Console, GSC, search analytics, search performance, queries, keywords, rankings, positions, impressions, clicks, CTR, striking-distance queries, title/meta rewrites, content briefs, internal links, SEO opportunities review, GEO, generative engine optimization, AI search, AI visibility, being cited by AI answer engines, ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/Claude/Copilot citations, brand entity, knowledge panel, Wikidata, schema.org, or entity readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ark UI headless / unstyled コンポーネントライブラリ。Zag.js ベース、Chakra UI v3 基盤。 React / Solid / Vue / Svelte 対応。asChild, RootProvider, createListCollection, createTreeCollection, data-* セレクタ。Tour, Signature Pad, Image Cropper, Floating Panel, Angle Slider 等のコンポーネント API。

Analytics de produto — PostHog, Mixpanel, eventos, funnels, cohorts, retencao, north star metric, OKRs e dashboards de produto.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI 自動化生產總控 SKILL — 從 UI 示意圖、參考圖、Figma snapshot 或既有頁面經驗啟動，串接 proof draft、family-map、MCQ、normalized recipe、task shard、ui-spec 與 CompositePanel / ChildPanel scaffold、靜態驗證、Browser QA 自動調整，直到交付人類驗收。USE FOR: 想把一張新 UI 從「給圖」一路推進到可驗證的 screen package 與 QA 閉環。DO NOT USE FOR: 單純修一個 runtime bug、單一 prefab 微調、純美術資產委託。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。