Use when evaluating portfolios through Ray Dalio-style economic machine, debt cycles, diversification, risk parity, and all-weather asset allocation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
746 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when evaluating portfolios through Ray Dalio-style economic machine, debt cycles, diversification, risk parity, and all-weather asset allocation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish project governing principles including dev guidelines, code quality standards, testing policies, UX requirements, performance benchmarks, and security constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The screenwriting business and career (编剧行业与生意经) — merged from Diamond & Weissman's Bulletproof (buyer's-eye workflow, three Cs, one-page nine-step, set pieces, submission, notes, resilience), Eric Bork's The Idea (PROBLEM seven-element idea test, 60/30/10, television differences), Neill Hicks (market four entities, six criteria, WGA, agents, option, credit arbitration, gross vs net, step deals), Richard Walter (query letter, agents, package, option, spec, release, copyright, guild, gatekeepers, professionalism, 66 principles), Wendy Henson (breaking in), Blake Snyder (logline pitch, genre, agents), Julian Hoxter (industry terms), Mei Feng's Oscar analyses, and the Hollywood masterclass (pitching, notes, credits, TV vs film). Use when evaluating whether an idea is sellable, writing a logline/query/pitch, preparing a submission, handling notes and rewrites, understanding options/credits/WGA/agents/net profit, choosing between film and TV, or building a career strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure by Design principles knowledge base for assessing security-first design, development, and deployment across the software lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes educational Teams channel posts about Claude Code features and best practices, using templates emphasizing concrete examples and underlying principles (e.g. context engineering). Use when writing a Teams post or announcement to teach colleagues Claude Code usage, announce a feature, share a tip, or document a lesson learned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a content style guide / voice & tone guide so everyone writes consistently. Use when asked to write a content style guide, a voice and tone guide, editorial guidelines, or UX-writing standards. Produces a usable guide — voice principles with do/don't examples, tone-by-context, mechanics (grammar, capitalisation, formatting), terminology/word list, and accessibility/inclusivity rules — that a team can actually apply.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Disney's 12 principles as practical design and engineering rules for procedural animation. Use when creating, improving, reviewing, or debugging code-driven motion in web, SVG, canvas, React, Remotion, game, UI, character, camera, or 3D scenes; especially when motion feels stiff, weightless, mechanical, unclear, or physically correct but visually weak.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a raster logo (PNG/JPG/WebP/screenshot) into a clean minimal SVG with edge smoothness as the primary hard gate and IoU optimized as high as reasonably possible without a fixed global threshold, then into a choreographed logo animation delivered as standalone JS-rendered HTML, applying Disney's 12 animation principles. Use when asked to animate a logo, build a logo reveal / splash screen / brand intro, convert a logo image into animated SVG or HTML, add motion to a vectorized mark, or create loading/idle/hover motion for a brand mark. v2: also handles self-crossing draw-on choreography (split-fill, exact easing subdivision, tip glint), closed variable-width ribbon fitting, and quantitative motion QA (easing probe, ink-delta continuity sweep).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Eval and improve a skill against golden cases — run the target skill blind in a fresh, context-free subagent on each example input, grade the artifact against the expected outcome, and let the gaps drive the edits. Use when the user wants to test/eval/improve/harden a skill, says "this skill keeps producing X / keeps missing Y", or hands a skill plus example input→expected-output pairs. Pairs with [write-skills](../write-skills/SKILL.md) (the authoring principles every fix obeys).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and edit project docs (README/markdown) as a glossary of principles, not a mirror of the code. Use when creating or revising a README; when a doc enumerates exact scenes, scenarios, helpers, class ids, file lists, or command/flag matrices the code already holds; when trimming narrative or changelog out of a doc; or when deduplicating overlapping docs and wiring a root doc to its sub-docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or rewrite AGENTS.md so it holds only lasting principles. Run it only when the user asks for it by name; never invoke it on your own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Minimalist UX/Interaction Audit Expert that deconstructs complex interactions through cognitive load and operational efficiency lenses. Use this skill when you need to perform a UX walkthrough audit on a Figma prototype or web interface, evaluating usability based on principles like fewer clicks, less UI elements, no hidden logic, and self-explanatory design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when handling research ethics, consent, community accountability, and data/transparency for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript — informed consent, anonymization, protection of vulnerable interlocutors, heritage and repatriation obligations, and what (and what NOT) to share. At AA this is an ethics-and-accountability skill grounded in the AAA ethics principles and an ethics of care. Plans the ethics and transparency; it does not grant waivers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design stable, compatible public APIs using extend-only design principles. Manage API compatibility, wire compatibility, and versioning for NuGet packages and distributed systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures biological experiments so inference is valid by construction, covering Fisher's principles (randomization, replication, local control), the experimental-vs-observational unit distinction and pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984; Lazic 2018), randomization mechanics (complete, restricted, stratified, rerandomization, run-order), blocking layouts (randomized complete block, Latin square, incomplete block), factorial designs and interactions, and the split-plot/nested error strata hidden inside multi-batch genomics. Use when deciding the experimental unit and what counts as a replicate, planning randomization and run order, choosing a blocked/factorial/split-plot/nested layout, avoiding pseudoreplication in cell-culture or animal studies, or specifying the random-effects structure of the analysis model. For assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates and batch-effect correction see experimental-design/batch-design; for regulated clinical-trial randomization see clinical-biostatistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 (119 platform features, including 77 prediction models with modeled-endpoint uncertainty), ADMET-AI, DeepChem MolNet, and chemprop D-MPNN with explicit handling of OECD QSAR principles, applicability domain assessment, calibration, hERG/CYP/AMES endpoints, and PAINS / Lipinski / Ro5 / Veber / BBB druglikeness filters. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness, prioritizing leads by predicted safety, or building an in-house ADMET QSAR model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds QSAR / QSPR models using chemprop D-MPNN, MolFormer, Uni-Mol, ChemBERTa, random forest baselines, and Gaussian processes with explicit handling of OECD 5 principles, applicability domain (kNN, leverage, conformal prediction, Mahalanobis), scaffold-balanced splits, ensemble uncertainty, calibration (Platt, isotonic), feature importance (SHAP, atomic attribution), and prospective validation. Use when building target-specific predictive models from in-house bioassay data, ADMET endpoints, or selectivity profiles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate versioning and changelog generation using semantic versioning principles. Configure release automation, version bumping, and changelog tools. Use when implementing version management or automating release processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。