「root cause」の検索結果

Periodic sweep that finds incidents marked resolved in {{incident_channel}}, correlates the channel timeline against GitHub deploys/merges and Datadog log spikes over the incident window, and drafts a structured postmortem as a PR under {{postmortem_path}} in {{target_repo}} — root cause and action items proposed, never finalized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structural analysis of complex systems — Iceberg model, Causal Loop feedback diagrams, archetype matching, Meadows leverage points, and concept maps — grounded in the premise that behavior is generated by structure. USE WHEN systems thinking, causal loop, feedback loops, archetypes, leverage points, iceberg model, fix the system, why does this keep happening, recurring problem, second-order effects. NOT FOR incident causal chains (use RootCauseAnalysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-cause a production error with Sentry's evidence before touching code — pull the issue, read the stack trace and breadcrumbs, and separate the crash from its trigger. Use when the user pastes a Sentry link or issue ID, reports a production error, or asks why something is crashing for users.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the root cause, implement a focused fix, and prove behavior with targeted tests and recordings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze GitHub Actions failures and identify root causes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and fix issues from Sentry using MCP. Use when asked to fix Sentry errors, debug production issues, investigate exceptions, or resolve bugs reported in Sentry. Methodically analyzes stack traces, breadcrumbs, traces, and context to identify root causes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production error → triaged, root-caused, repaired, and certified (tsc + rehearsal + reproduce-then-gone) fix PR for a human to merge — then confirm the error stops recurring. Never auto-merges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SRE investigator for incidents and debugging. Uses hypothesis-driven methodology and systematic triage. Can query Axiom observability when available. Use for incident response, root cause analysis, production debugging, or log investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Incident response workup for a lead in hand — an alert, an IOC, or a /dnr-hunt finding. Scopes the lead across the logs, verdicts whether the attack succeeded, quantifies blast radius, confirms root cause in source with a local PoC, and writes a proposed (never executed) containment/remediation/recovery plan. Use when asked to "respond to this alert", "work this incident", "how bad is this", or "run dnr-respond". /dnr-hunt is the no-alert entry to the same track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates security patches with reproducible baseline-versus-patched evidence, including original exploits, root-cause variants, behavior preservation, regressions, and newly introduced security failures. Use after a patch exists and before accepting, merging, or reporting it as fixed; also use when an AI-generated patch, remediation commit, pull request, or proposed upstream fix needs adversarial post-patch validation across any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix failing CircleCI builds quickly and safely. Use when users ask to investigate failed CircleCI jobs, triage flaky pipelines, identify root causes from logs, and implement minimal fixes in configuration, test setup, or build-related code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews diffs, PRs, release readiness, and publishing follow-through. Use when asked to review, triage issues or PRs, or ship. Not for debugging root causes or prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds root cause before any fix. Use when something errors, crashes, regresses, or used to work. Not for code review or new features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and repair LoopX control-plane drift or agent behavior drift. Use when a LoopX task makes unexpectedly small progress, follows a stale or contradictory recommended_action, ignores a higher-priority blocked item while doing fallback work, reports vague owner/user gates, loses todo projection, misaligns benchmark treatment with the real product path, mixes temporary artifacts into commits, or when the user asks for root-cause analysis, self-repair, or why the harness/agent behaved unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete reference for 26 web2 bug classes with root causes, detection patterns, bypass tables, exploit techniques, and real paid examples. Covers IDOR, auth bypass, XSS (postMessage), SSRF (11 IP bypass techniques), SQLi, business logic, race conditions, OAuth/OIDC, file upload (10 bypass techniques), GraphQL, LLM/AI (ASI01-ASI10, MCP/RAG attacks), API misconfig (mass assignment, JWT, prototype pollution, CORS), ATO (9 paths), SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, MFA bypass (7 patterns), SAML attacks, error disclosure, CSS injection, LFI/RCE, insecure deserialization, dependency confusion, padding oracle. Use when hunting a specific vuln class or studying what makes bugs pay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks", "review access control weaknesses", "analyze API security issues", "assess security misconfigurations", "understand client-side vulnerabilities", "examine mobile and IoT security flaws", or "reference the OWASP-aligned vulnerability taxonomy". Use this skill to provide comprehensive vulnerability definitions, root causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies across all major web security categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel divergent ideation for coding agents. Spawns N isolated branches under different cognitive frames (regulator, biology, speedrunner, 10-year-old, $0 budget), scores, clusters, prunes traps, and deepens top survivors. Use on /adhd, "ADHD mode", brainstorm/ideate intents, or open-ended design, architecture, naming, API/SDK surface, and fuzzy-debugging decisions. Skip for syntax, lookups, bugs with known root cause, or closed phrasing ("quick", "standard", "canonical", "textbook"). Full pre-flight gate is in the skill body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

矛盾分析法：把复杂问题拆成若干对立面，找出规定其他矛盾的主要矛盾及其主要方面，判定对抗性 / 非对抗性，并据此选择处理方式。当问题头绪多、多个因素互相牵制、优先级不清、根因不明、反复修不好、trade-off 说不清时触发；直接执行类任务或用户已定方案时不触发。 English: Contradiction analysis. Decompose a tangled problem into opposing forces, isolate the principal contradiction and its dominant side, classify it as antagonistic or non-antagonistic, and choose the response accordingly. Trigger on unclear priorities, unknown root causes, recurring failures, or trade-offs that resist explanation; skip for direct execution or when the user has already chosen the solution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a high-signal bug issue or PR in the repo that owns the defect. Use this whenever the user asks to report, file, open, or triage a LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, Codex plugin, or upstream Codex CLI bug, especially when they need source-backed root cause, reproduction steps, fix guidance, and GitHub routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate implementation failures using root-cause-first debugging. Use when an implementer is blocked, verification fails, or repeated remediation does not converge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Completion-evidence route used before claiming work is complete, fixed, passing, committed, or PR-ready. Requires fresh verification output before success claims. Do not use for root-cause debugging, TDD implementation, test-report packaging, or review-feedback triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-first development route for TDD, writing failing tests first, RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR, and behavior-changing feature/bug/refactor work. Do not use for already-failing test root-cause debugging, test-report packaging, or final completion evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-cause route for actual bugs, failing tests, build errors, crashes, stack traces, and unexpected behavior. Do not use for test-first/TDD feature work, test-report packaging, review-feedback handling, or final completion evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。