「stress」の検索結果

Think and work like an expert Geotechnical Scientist. Use when a task calls for Geotechnical Scientist judgment. Reasons from Terzaghi effective stress, Mohr–Coulomb/CSSM, and consolidation/seepage through SPT/CPTU (Robertson SBT), triaxial/oedometer (ASTM D-series), Boulanger–Idriss liquefaction, Hoek–Brown/GSI rock mass, EC7 characteristic values, and PLAXIS/Slide2/RS2/GeoStudio workflows while treating sample disturbance, N-value correction chains, spatial variability, and LEM-vs-FEM mismatch as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Geotechnical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Geotechnical Engineer judgment. Reasons from effective stress and LRFD/EC7 limit states through GDR/GBR/FDR deliverables, shallow and deep foundations (GEC 6/10/12), excavation support (DeepEX, LPILE), ground improvement, ASCE 7 liquefaction, observational-method triggers, and FHWA pile acceptance while treating DSC claims, setup vs. blow count, and GBR-vs-design conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Glycobiologist. Use when a task calls for Glycobiologist judgment. Reasons from N-/O-glycan biosynthesis, O-GlcNAc cycling (OGT/OGA), LC-MS glycomics, exoglycosidase sequencing, and lectin microarrays; uses GlyTouCan/SNFG/MIRAGE, pGlyco/GlycoWorkbench, and treats PNGase F limits, isomer collapse, and ER-stress high-mannose as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Foundation Engineer. Use when a task calls for Foundation Engineer judgment. Reasons from effective stress, ULS versus SLS limit states, and construction-altered soil behavior through CPT/SPT logging, triaxial and oedometer testing, LRFD φ-factor checks, and LPILE/PLAXIS analysis while treating liquefaction-driven lateral spread, negative skin friction downdrag, differential settlement, and scour as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Electronics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Electronics Engineer judgment. Reasons from datasheet-corner device physics, signal-chain error budgets, and analog-digital return-path coupling through LTspice/IBIS-AMI simulation, ICT/boundary-scan coverage, golden-board signature comparison, and IPC/AEC-Q standards while treating ESD versus EOS overstress, MLCC DC-bias derating, reference and clock-jitter ENOB loss, and NFF field returns as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Biomedical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Biomedical Engineer judgment. Reasons from ISO 14971 risk management, ISO 10993 biocompatibility matrices, ASTM F/ISO 14242 mechanical and wear testing, and FDA 510(k) substantial equivalence; treats stress shielding, UHMWPE osteolysis, F2129 corrosion artifacts, and predicate/material mismatches as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Animal Scientist. Use when a task calls for Animal Scientist judgment. Reasons from NRC nutrient requirements, ad libitum intake, energy/protein partitioning, and genotype x environment x management through ration software (CNCPS, NDS, NRC), pen-blocked trials with mixed models (lme4, PROC MIXED), and BCS, NIR, and rumen/BHBA diagnostics while treating intake collapse, milk fat depression, acidosis, heat stress, wrong experimental unit, and violated withdrawal times as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break out of a locked problem frame by picking one disciplined move — reframe, provocation (Po), random stimulus, SCAMPER, inversion, structured analogy, constraint play, or family traversal — and committing to it before evaluating. Use when stuck, when options feel narrow or obvious, when iterations produce variations of the same idea, or when the user says "widen this", "break out of", "think differently", "I'm stuck", "feels too obvious", "stress-test the framing", "what am I missing", or holds two related examples and asks what lies between or beyond them. Complements challenging (which evaluates) and convening-experts (which synthesizes viewpoints); this skill generates distance, not judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-context adversarial review for deliverables before shipping. Use when producing blog posts, technical recommendations, analysis briefs, code, or any artifact where accuracy matters more than speed. Triggers on "challenge this", "review before shipping", "adversarial pass", "stress test this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ポートフォリオのストレステスト。保有銘柄リストを受け取り、ショック感応度・シナリオ分析・因果連鎖を通じてPFの弱点を特定する。

CRE Lender/Credit analysis suite - 8 specialist skills for U.S. CRE loan screening and sizing, sponsor and appraisal review, credit memo writing, annual risk rating, covenant and watchlist monitoring, problem loans, and portfolio stress testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs performance and load testing: stress, spike, soak, capacity, CI budget gates. Use when planning load tests or perf gates; not code or SQL tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When something breaks in production: triage the severity, gather evidence, identify root cause, deploy a fix or mitigation, and write a post-mortem. Provides a calm, structured process for high-stress moments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before committing to an implementation plan, run this skill to stress-test the proposed architecture. Catches over-engineering, circular dependencies, missing failure modes, security gaps, and scalability cliffs — before any code is written. Acts as a "second eye" on the plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redesign a learning space using biophilic design principles to improve focus, calm, and wellbeing. Use when classroom environment contributes to restlessness, poor attention, or stress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Working Backwards PRFAQ challenge that stress-tests a product concept customer-first. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。