「train」の検索結果

Routes AutoTrain Advanced installation, CLI, config, training, UI/API, backend, and utility workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Addresses healthcare AI privacy at the intersection of HIPAA and the EU AI Act for clinical decision support systems. Covers training data PHI handling, model transparency and explainability, patient rights in algorithmic decisions, FDA/OCR regulatory coordination, and bias monitoring. Keywords: healthcare AI, HIPAA, AI Act, clinical decision support, PHI training data, model transparency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements data subject rights mechanisms for AI systems including right to explanation of AI decisions, contestation procedures, human review, model output correction, and training data access. Covers GDPR Arts. 15-22 and AI Act Art. 86. Keywords: data subject rights, AI explanation, contestation, human review, training data access, model correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing. Covers training data lawfulness evaluation, model risk assessment, automated decision triggers, and AI-specific DPIA methodology. Keywords: AI DPIA, machine learning impact assessment, EDPB AI guidelines, model risk, training data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build consistent characters, environments and props in Guaardvark's Cast Library and train LoRAs for them locally (reference photos → vision bible → sample plan → approved samples → training). Use when the user wants the same face or object across images, videos, a music video, or a Film Crew production, or asks to "train a LoRA".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms natural language requirements (user stories, verbal descriptions, business rules) into formal specifications and constraints. Use when converting informal requirements into structured, testable specifications with explicit constraints. Outputs in multiple formats including BDD-style Given-When-Then, JSON Schema, and structured plain text requirements documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create personalized triathlon, marathon, and ultra-endurance training plans. Use when athletes ask for training plans, workout schedules, race preparation, or coaching advice. Can sync with Strava to analyze training history, or work from manually provided fitness data. Generates periodized plans with sport-specific workouts, zones, and race-day strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when training models across multiple GPUs or nodes, handling large models that don't fit in memory, or optimizing training throughput - covers DDP, FSDP, DeepSpeed ZeRO, model/data parallelism, and gradient checkpointingUse when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Figma 转 Photoshop (PSD) (Figma → Photoshop (PSD) 设计稿转换 (从业者视角) — 把 Figma 设计文件高保真转换为 Photoshop 分层 PSD, 核心是对齐两个工具的概念/渲染差异, 让产出的设计稿视觉一致. 覆盖: (a) 概念映射 — Figma frame / auto-layout / component / variant / constraint / vector-network / boolean / effect (drop·inner shadow / layer·background blur) / mask / blend mode / gradient / text-engine / color 与 Photoshop artboard / group / smart-object / linked / layer-style / shape-layer / path / clipping·layer mask / blend-mode 的对应关系与不可逆损耗点; (b) 转换方法栈 — 插件直出 PSD / 导出图层 (PNG·SVG) 再重组 / SVG·PDF 桥接 / 手工重建 / Figma REST API + Photoshop UXP·ExtendScript 脚本化, 各法在保真度-可编辑性-工时上的权衡与选型; (c) 保真度 QA — 字体回退与缺字处理 / 颜色空间 (sRGB·ICC profile) / 效果参数对齐 / @Nx·DPI 与栅格化 / 像素 diff 验收; (d) 两种交付目标 — 可编辑分层 PSD vs 像素保真扁平 PSD 的方法选择. 主战场 = Figma Community 插件 + Adobe 官方文档/论坛 + 设计交付 (design handoff) 实践 + 设计师社区. 不含: PSD→Figma 反向转换 / Sketch / Adobe XD / 纯前端 code handoff (HTML·CSS) / 印刷 CMYK 专业制版 (仅触及).) Master OS — automated mastery of Figma → Photoshop (PSD) 设计稿转换 (从业者视角) — 把 Figma 设计文件高保真转换为 Photoshop 分层 PSD, 核心是对齐两个工具的概念/渲染差异, 让产出的设计稿视觉一致. 覆盖: (a) 概念映射 — Figma frame / auto-layout / component / variant / constraint / vector-network / boolean / effect (drop·inner shadow / layer·background blur) / mask / blend mode / gradient / text-engine / color 与 Photoshop artboard / group / smart-object / linked / layer-style / shape-layer / path / clipping·layer mask / blend-mode 的对应关系与不可逆损耗点; (b) 转换方法栈 — 插件直出 PSD / 导出图层 (PNG·SVG) 再重组 / SVG·PDF 桥接 / 手工重建 / Figma REST API + Photoshop UXP·ExtendScript 脚本化, 各法在保真度-可编辑性-工时上的权衡与选型; (c) 保真度 QA — 字体回退与缺字处理 / 颜色空间 (sRGB·ICC profile) / 效果参数对齐 / @Nx·DPI 与栅格化 / 像素 diff 验收; (d) 两种交付目标 — 可编辑分层 PSD vs 像素保真扁平 PSD 的方法选择. 主战场 = Figma Community 插件 + Adobe 官方文档/论坛 + 设计交付 (design handoff) 实践 + 设计师社区. 不含: PSD→Figma 反向转换 / Sketch / Adobe XD / 纯前端 code handoff (HTML·CSS) / 印刷 CMYK 专业制版 (仅触及).: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Figma → Photoshop (PSD) 设计稿转换 (从业者视角) — 把 Figma 设计文件高保真转换为 Photoshop 分层 PSD, 核心是对齐两个工具的概念/渲染差异, 让产出的设计稿视觉一致. 覆盖: (a) 概念映射 — Figma frame / auto-layout / component / variant / constraint / vector-network / boolean / effect (drop·inner shadow / layer·background blur) / mask / blend mode / gradient / text-engine / color 与 Photoshop artboard / group / smart-object / linked / layer-style / shape-layer / path / clipping·layer mask / blend-mode 的对应关系与不可逆损耗点; (b) 转换方法栈 — 插件直出 PSD / 导出图层 (PNG·SVG) 再重组 / SVG·PDF 桥接 / 手工重建 / Figma REST API + Photoshop UXP·ExtendScript 脚本化, 各法在保真度-可编辑性-工时上的权衡与选型; (c) 保真度 QA — 字体回退与缺字处理 / 颜色空间 (sRGB·ICC profile) / 效果参数对齐 / @Nx·DPI 与栅格化 / 像素 diff 验收; (d) 两种交付目标 — 可编辑分层 PSD vs 像素保真扁平 PSD 的方法选择. 主战场 = Figma Community 插件 + Adobe 官方文档/论坛 + 设计交付 (design handoff) 实践 + 设计师社区. 不含: PSD→Figma 反向转换 / Sketch / Adobe XD / 纯前端 code handoff (HTML·CSS) / 印刷 CMYK 专业制版 (仅触及). problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「figma 转 psd」「figma to psd」「figma 转 photoshop」「figma 导出 psd」「设计稿转换」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Theory of Constraints primitives for focusing steps, drum-buffer-rope, throughput accounting, critical chain, and policy constraints. Use when sequencing by bottleneck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides multi-GPU pre-training: DDP, FSDP2, ZeRO, tensor/pipeline/expert parallelism, fp8/Muon. Use when scaling a run, training MoE, or reproducing GPT-2 on rented GPUs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds LLM pretraining corpora from Common Crawl: extract, filter, deduplicate, decontaminate, mix, synthesize. Use when curating or ablating a pretraining corpus or data pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design producer training programs. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with insurance-producer-training related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MLOps and the production ML lifecycle -- model packaging and serving, CI/CD for ML, experiment tracking, model registries, reproducibility, production monitoring for data and concept drift, retraining pipelines, A/B and shadow deployment, and rollback. Covers batch vs online/real-time inference, REST endpoints, feature stores, data and version pinning, deterministic pipelines, performance-decay detection, and retraining triggers. Use when deploying models to production, serving predictions, monitoring for data or concept drift, setting up ML CI/CD, tracking experiments, managing a model registry, or planning retraining, shadow rollout, and rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode through bounded H100 post-training tasks and compare how well each agent improves a base LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trains the HUMAN user's critical thinking through four modes: drill (argument-analysis items with a single defensible answer, judge stance), scene (Socratic exploration of synthetic scenes or user-supplied material, no verdicts on interpretations; includes a configure track — design the information request and verification plan for a decision before any analysis), expedition (guided audit of impossible-tier problems from verified packs), and detective (a runtime-generated multi-layer case worked as an escape room, guide-and-judge stance). Use when the user wants to practice critical thinking, analyze arguments, hunt assumptions, examine bias, train reasoning, or decide what information a decision needs first. Triggers: critical thinking practice, train my thinking, drill, scene, byom, configure, information plan, what would I need to know, spot manipulation tactics, scam literacy, 批判思考練習, 話術辨識, detective, 查案, 破案, 偵探.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up systematic data labeling workflows using Label Studio or similar tools. Implement quality controls, measure inter-annotator agreement, manage labeler teams, and integrate labeled data into ML training pipelines. Use when starting a supervised ML project that requires labeled training data, when model performance is limited by insufficient labeled examples, when labeling text, images, audio, or video, or when implementing active learning to prioritize the most valuable examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end system for creating supervised fine-tuning datasets from books and training style-transfer models. Covers text extraction, intelligent segmentation, synthetic instruction generation, Tinker-compatible output, LoRA training, and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build DPO training pipelines for AI alignment. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-dpo-trainer related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design accessibility training. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with accessibility-training-program related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"SME and family-business management for Taiwan's industrial structure (98% SME, 70%+ family-controlled listed). Integrates four pillars: resource-constrained decision-making, family governance (Tagiuri-Davis three circles), four-layer succession, and professionalization. Use for sub-200-employee strategy, capital-constrained prioritization, family-vs-professional-manager conflict, founder handover, family-constitution design, or SME financing limits. Triggers: 『二代接班』『家族企業』『中小企業』『家族憲章』『家族辦公室』『傳承規劃』『小公司策略』『資源有限』『家族跟專業經理人』『三圓模型』『隱形冠軍』. For 成大 EMBA SME strategy, 政大 EMBA family-business succession, 逢甲 EMBA SME management cases. Fills Asgard gaps in resource-constrained strategy and Chinese-family governance.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute sophisticated Data Extraction and Privacy Leakage attacks explicitly against Large Language Models (LLMs) to natively force the neural network entirely into organically regurgitating exact, verbatim strings of Highly Confidential Personally Identifiable Information (PII), proprietary source code, or copyrighted material categorically memorized intrinsically during its foundational pre-training phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。