「verification」の検索結果

Assists with Morphir CLI release management for finos/morphir, including pre-release verification, extension verification, version bumps, tagging, and release coordination. Use when preparing releases, checking release readiness, or managing version bumps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative task completion loop with Definition of Done verification. Combines the Ralph Wiggum technique (prompt re-injection via Stop hook) with DoD-based independent verification. Claude proposes DoD criteria, user confirms, then Claude works autonomously. Stop hook re-injects the original prompt and blocks exit until all DoD items are independently verified. "/ralph", "ralph loop", "ralph 루프", "반복 작업", "DoD 루프", "완료 검증 루프", "task loop", "keep going until done"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up automated database backup, restore, and disaster recovery procedures for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and Redis. Use when you need to implement backup schedules, point-in-time recovery, cross-region replication, backup verification, or disaster recovery runbooks. Trigger words: database backup, pg_dump, mysqldump, mongodump, disaster recovery, point-in-time recovery, WAL archiving, backup rotation, restore database, RTO, RPO, backup verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions. Use after implementation to validate correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify before claiming completion. No claims without fresh verification evidence. Use before marking work done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and run Guardrails verification for code, dependency, test, tooling, documentation, or repository-workflow changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mandatory verification steps for all code reviews to reduce false positives. Load this skill before reporting ANY code review findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage construction contract administration from the field perspective. Covers AIA contract forms (A101, A201, A401), bond types and requirements, mechanics lien law, insurance verification, indemnification, dispute resolution, and subcontractor default procedures. Provides practical field guidance for notice requirements, lien waiver processing, COI verification, and claims documentation. Integrates with pay-application (lien waivers), change-order-tracker (constructive changes), delay-tracker (notice provisions), sub-performance (default triggers), and cost-tracking (back-charges). Triggers: "contract", "contract admin", "AIA", "A201", "A101", "bond", "performance bond", "payment bond", "lien", "lien waiver", "mechanics lien", "insurance", "COI", "certificate of insurance", "OCIP", "CCIP", "indemnification", "dispute", "mediation", "arbitration", "notice", "cure notice", "default", "sub default", "termination for cause", "claims", "ConsensusDocs", "EJCDC".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formally verify construction payment bonds by extracting fields from bond documents and cross-referencing against Treasury Circular 570, state licensing, and underwriting limits. Use whenever the user uploads a payment bond PDF, mentions bond verification, asks "is this bond valid", references AIA A312, or needs to verify a surety company's authority to write bonds. Also trigger on "verify bond", "check surety", "payment bond", "performance bond", or "Circular 570."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amazon Bedrock Automated Reasoning for mathematical verification of AI responses against formal policy rules with up to 99% accuracy. Use when validating healthcare protocols, financial compliance, legal regulations, insurance policies, or any domain requiring deterministic verification of AI-generated content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mathematical verification for physical calculations: unit tracking algebra (exponent maps), PhysicalQuantity pattern for compound units, SI/Imperial mixed-unit handling, Buckingham pi theorem for dimensionless groups, and common engineering dimensionless numbers. Activates for unit verification, dimensional consistency checks, scaling analysis, and calculation validation across all infrastructure domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce mandatory pre-action verification checkpoints to prevent pattern-matching from overriding explicit reasoning. Use this skill when about to execute implementation actions (Bash, Write, Edit) to verify hypothesis-action alignment. Blocks execution when hypothesis unverified or action targets different system than hypothesis identified. Critical for preventing cognitive dissonance where correct diagnosis leads to wrong implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating a new Claude Code plugin from scratch — orchestrates prerequisite check, user discussion, parallel research, design with verification, atomic implementation, multi-layer validation, documentation, and final verification. For existing plugin improvement, use /plugin-creator:plugin-lifecycle instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Certifies that a feature achieves its original objectives via goal-backward verification (SAM Stage 7). Use when all tasks pass forensic review — starts from expected outcomes, works backwards to verify each was achieved, and returns CERTIFIED or NOT_CERTIFIED with specific gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains Chain of Verification (CoVe) prompt design — a 4-step pattern separating generation from independent factual verification. Use when designing prompts that require factual accuracy, reducing hallucinations, checking technical standards or APIs, or producing step-by-step procedures where subtle errors are costly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification loop for Spring Boot projects: build, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and diff review before release or PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification loop for Laravel projects: env checks, linting, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。