「every」の検索結果

Wire the current repository through the Caveman Cloud gateway so every LLM request is measured — cost, tokens, latency — with zero behavior change. Use when the user pastes the Caveman setup prompt, says "set up caveman", or wants LLM spend observability added to an app. Requires the gateway URL and a Cave API key (the setup prompt carries both).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find every LLM workflow in the current repository and label it, so Caveman Cloud groups spend by what the code actually does (support-reply, nightly-digest) instead of one anonymous bucket. Use when the user pastes the Caveman discovery prompt, says "discover workflows", or asks to break LLM spend down by workflow. The repo should already route through the Caveman gateway (the caveman-setup skill does that part).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close the loop on a Caveman learn report — review the ranked token sinks and apply cost-lowering fixes (trim config, offload recurring context to cavemem) with per-edit consent. Use when the user runs "caveman learn", asks to lower their agent's token cost, wants to trim a heavy CLAUDE.md, or wants to offload context they re-paste every session into cavemem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refreshing a RACI (Responsible / Accountable / Consulted / Informed) matrix for a Salesforce project so that every Salesforce-specific decision — data model change, automation tier choice, security model, integration boundary, deployment, license/edition — has exactly one accountable owner and a documented escalation path that downstream agents can route to. Trigger keywords: RACI matrix salesforce project, stakeholder authority salesforce, escalation path salesforce decisions, who approves data model change, salesforce decision rights, REFUSAL_NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW routing. NOT for the change advisory board operating model itself (use admin/change-management-and-deployment). NOT for end-user training rollout plans (use admin/change-management-and-training). NOT for the technical mechanics of permission set assignment authority (use admin/permission-set-architecture). NOT for pure stakeholder requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). More trigger keywords: who approves a sandbox refresh, who signs off a data load, release update activation owner, delegated admin authority vs RACI, multi-org decision rights, escalation time-box.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Salesforce-anchored personas and journey maps where every persona ties to a Permission Set Group, primary record types, list views, dashboards, automation, and a measured mobile/desktop posture, and journeys walk each task end-to-end with friction tags that drive UX decisions. NOT for stakeholder authority / RACI (use admin/stakeholder-raci-for-sf-projects), NOT for system-side process flows (use admin/process-flow-as-is-to-be), NOT for Lightning page design itself (use admin/lightning-app-builder-advanced or the lightning-record-page-auditor agent), NOT for pure design / UX research disconnected from org artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, sequencing, or troubleshooting an org-wide migration from Salesforce Classic to Lightning Experience. Covers the LEX Transition Assistant Readiness Check, asset triage matrix (Visualforce, JavaScript buttons, page layouts, Knowledge, email templates, list views, AppExchange), pilot/wave rollout sequencing, end-user adoption telemetry, and cutover criteria. Triggers: 'lightning experience transition', 'classic to lightning migration plan', 'LEX readiness check', 'why are some users still on Classic', 'turning on Lightning for everyone'. NOT for individual asset migrations like a single VF page (use lwc/visualforce-to-lwc-migration), a single JavaScript button (use admin/custom-button-to-action-migration), or Knowledge article migration (use admin/knowledge-classic-to-lightning) — this skill orchestrates the program. NOT for Lightning App Builder page design (use admin/lightning-app-builder-advanced).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or repair lookup filters that constrain a child lookup using fields from the parent record (or a sibling record on the same object). Triggers: 'limit lookup based on another field', 'cross-object lookup filter', 'lookup filter $Source vs $User', 'lookupFilter block in field-meta.xml', 'booleanFilter with three filterItems', 'picker still shows every record after deploy', 'lookup filter error message not translated'. NOT for choosing lookup vs master-detail - use admin/lookup-and-relationship-design. NOT for duplicate matching rule criteria - use admin/duplicate-management. NOT for the rest of the CustomField element set - use admin/custom-field-creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specify a FlexCard before a developer opens Card Designer: the card-state set and the condition that selects each state, the data source type behind each card (DataRaptor, Integration Procedure, Apex remote, SOQL), the action menu users get (navigate, launch OmniScript, Apex, DataRaptor), and every embedded child FlexCard or custom LWC. Produces the artifacts a BA hands to the builder. Trigger keywords: FlexCard requirements, FlexCard BA, FlexCard layout design, FlexCard data sources, FlexCard actions, FlexCard card states, OmniStudio FlexCard scoping. NOT for building the card in Card Designer, NOT for OmniScript step and branching requirements (use admin/omniscript-flow-design-requirements), NOT for standard Lightning record-page component requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a finished piece from human-written fragments via an orchestrated two-loop pipeline - an assembly loop (assembler + cold reviewer) that sequences the fragments into a draft, then a polish loop (polisher + cold reviewer), then frequency analysis and a catalog-deslop pass with a regression gate. Two modes with opposite fidelity contracts - stitch mode preserves the author's exact wording, narrative mode preserves every idea but may rewrite freely. Use when the user says "mosaic", "assemble my fragments", "stitch these notes into a post", or provides a fragments file to turn into a finished piece. For writing from a topic with research, use article-factory; for prose from scratch, use the prose skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test any software project (CLI, API, Backend, Library, etc.) to find bugs, usability issues, and edge cases. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence (exact commands, inputs, logs, and tracebacks) for every issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate work as a cyclic directed graph of subagent-executed nodes with transition criteria on edges, budgeted cycles, and per-node gates (runtime verification, metric, or artifact). Use when the user says "workgraph", "run this as a graph", "graph this work", or when a goal has parallel branches, feedback loops, or mixed gate types that a linear loop cannot express. Every node is sized to a 64k context budget, so small goals run as a two-node do/verify graph and large goals scale out without caps. For clock-driven or metric-driven single loops, timeboxed-iterating and autoresearch remain lighter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run work as an explicit event-driven state machine executed by subagents. The orchestrator is the runtime from the canonical loop — `state, effects = init(machine); execute(effects); while state is active: event = nextEvent(); state, effects = transition(machine, state, event); execute(effects); return state.output`. All routing judgment is authored ONCE, at plan time, into a machine file (states, event alphabet, transition table, budgets, final states); at runtime the orchestrator does pure table lookups and dispatches effects — it never decides, never authors, never ingests artifacts. Subagent/sync protocol is the timeboxed-iterating one: role prompts scaffolded once to disk and dispatched BY PATH, an initialiser preamble every subagent reads first, a self-populating cheatsheet, per-unit files, tiny structured returns, independent measurement gate. Use when the user says "workmachine", "run this as a state machine", "state-machine this", or when a goal has a small number of clearly named phases with explicit outcomes (built / passed / failed / blocked) and you want the routing to be auditable rather than judged on the fly. For clock-driven loops use timeboxed-iterating; for wide graphs with judged edge criteria use workgraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, restructure, or review documentation — tutorials, how-to guides, reference pages, concept/explanation docs, API references, READMEs, changelogs, release notes, and troubleshooting guides. Distills documentation craft from Mintlify's guides (compiled from technical writers at Stripe, GitHub, Amplitude, and Anaconda), the Diátaxis framework (including the compass and per-type voice), the Google and Microsoft style guides, Every Page Is Page One, Write the Docs, and Docs for Developers: audience analysis, content-type selection, style and word-level rules, procedure writing, structure for humans and AI agents, code-example standards, page templates (templates.md), mechanical enforcement and llms.txt (mechanics.md), maintenance, and success metrics. Use this skill when the user asks to "write docs", "document this feature", "improve this page", "review these docs", "write a tutorial / how-to / reference page", "structure the docs", "write API documentation", "write a README / changelog", or when authoring any file under a `docs/` tree. For SKMTC docs specifically, this skill governs the *craft* (what makes the page good); the content split between skills, `llms.md`, and the docs tree is governed by `docs/skills/README.md`. Distinct from `skmtc-retro` (captures observations about work) and the `skmtc-*` operational skills (guide doing the work) — this skill guides writing *about* the work for readers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The operation-generator shape for Skmtc: one definition per (path, method), for any output family — client hooks, SDK methods, forms, route stubs, docs. Output varies wildly; the DECOMPOSITION of the operation and the peer-consumption rules do not. Core teaching: every schema that appears in your output is a reference to a model generator's definition, obtained through the insert machinery — never rendered text. Use when authoring or editing a generator whose subject is operations ("write a gen for API clients/hooks/routes", "generate an SDK/form per endpoint"). Covers the projection shape only — accumulators (many operations → one file) are out of scope. Load ALONGSIDE skmtc-generator and the emitted language's skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The model-generator shape for Skmtc: one definition per component schema, built by copying the shipped SKELETON package and filling its SLOT markers with the target library's syntax. Covers the edge cases every model generator must survive — refs, recursion, optional vs nullable, additionalProperties, enums, readOnly/writeOnly. Use when authoring or editing a generator that maps schemas to a validator/schema/type library ("write a gen-<lib>", "map OpenAPI models to <lib>"). Load ALONGSIDE skmtc-generator (engine rules) and skmtc-lang-typescript (TS layer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanical consistency check for game design — answers "is the design consistent with itself?" — plus changed-scope impact analysis across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Offline and deterministic: greps the facts registry against the documents (numbers, terms, IDs, duplicate & dangling references, roster↔disk, map freshness, Depends 3-way, status/version, AC presence, placeholder leaks, flow & content schema), and from a git diff computes which dependent systems, flows, and content a change affects. Scope is inferred: a named document checks that document; an unverified diff triggers a changed-scope pass; otherwise everything. Use when the user wants a consistency or impact check, e.g. "verify the design", "what did this change affect", "find broken references in the design". Conflicts triage into four tracks; the entailed fixes hand off to /unikit-gd-apply in one pass. This is the mechanical pass — for a subjective "is this design good" quality critique use /unikit-gd-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a completed implementation against the plan in .unikit/code/plans/. Checks that every task was implemented, nothing was forgotten, the code compiles, the recorded test run still matches the code, and {{engine_name}} conventions are followed. Use after /unikit-implement completes, or when the user says "verify", "check the work", "did we miss anything". For code review use /unikit-review instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cold-start brownfield reconnaissance — reconstruct the WHOLE game design from an existing codebase when there is no GDD yet. Optionally accepts a free-text game description, notes, or reference links to guide and enrich the scan. Use when the user wants to build the game design from the code, e.g. "create a GDD from this codebase", "reconstruct the design from our code — it's a roguelike deck-builder", "build a design doc from the existing project, here are some refs". Scans the project (engine auto-detected), extracts a system roster + dependency graph and content-type schemas / resources / entities into one passive .unikit/gamedesign/RECON.md, tags every fact provenance:extracted-from-code, and writes a mandatory Intent Gap for what code cannot know (pillars, fantasy, the "why"). Writes nothing else and calls no skill. STRICTLY whole-project cold-start — if a GDD already exists and the user wants a specific part investigated, use /unikit-gd-explore (code lens); to author the GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。