「implementation」の検索結果

Optimize prompts for code-related tasks following prompt-engineering best practices. Use when refining prompts for implementation, debugging, refactoring, code review, or testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements stateful agent graphs using LangGraph. Use when building graphs, adding nodes/edges, defining state schemas, implementing checkpointing, handling interrupts, or creating multi-agent systems with LangGraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a feature request into a minimal, file-level implementation plan before any code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an implementation against its plan with a hostile peer agent, debate findings to consensus, and drive fix waves until the auditor runs dry. Use when a done-claim needs verification the implementer cannot game ("hostile review", "adversarial audit", "is this PR faithful", "find the escape hatches") — the loop that beats the laziness bias with its own game theory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discoverability shim for the Retail-Agentic-Commerce pre-commit analysis Codex skill. Use before commits, after significant changes, or for implementation-quality validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggest whether Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build is a useful next collaborator, without launching a CLI or changing controls. Use when comparing the three CLIs, planning a handoff, or deciding whether an independent implementation or review would help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue a task in OpenAI Codex CLI through a portable Director handoff packet. Use when the user asks Codex to take over, wants an independent Codex implementation or review, or needs to preserve decisions and verification while changing CLIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct substantial repository work across Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build with a concise brief, parallel agents, evidence-based completion, and optional cross-CLI continuation. Use for project onboarding, multi-step implementation, agent coordination, verification planning, low-interruption setup, or deciding how another CLI should take over. Do not use it as a permission gate or mandatory workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apache Pekko + Scala 3によるCQRS/Event Sourcing実装ガイド。 PersistenceEffectorを用いた集約アクター、ドメインモデルとアクターの分離、 状態遷移の型安全な表現、イベント設計、Protocol Buffersシリアライズ、 ZIOベースのユースケース層、リードモデルアップデータの実装パターンを提供する。 対象言語: Scala 3限定。CQRS/Event Sourcingアーキテクチャが前提の場合のみ使用。 トリガー条件: 「Scala」かつ「CQRS」または「Event Sourcing」または「Pekko」が リクエストに含まれる場合のみ起動。Scala以外の言語やCQRS/ES以外のアーキテクチャでは このスキルを使用してはならない。 トリガー：「PekkoでCQRS/ESを実装したい」「Scalaで集約アクターを書きたい」 「PersistenceEffectorの使い方」「Pekkoのイベントソーシング」 「ScalaでCQRSのコマンド側を実装」「Pekkoで状態遷移を管理」 といったPekko + Scala + CQRS/ES実装リクエストで起動。 非トリガー：「CQRSのトレードオフ」「イベントソーシングとは」「JavaでCQRS」 「GoでEvent Sourcing」「CQRSの概念を教えて」など、Scala/Pekko以外や概念的な質問では 起動してはならない。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify EVM warp route contract source code on block explorers (implementation, ProxyAdmin, TransparentUpgradeableProxy)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU Insurance Adviser specializing in IDD compliance for life, health, property, and insurance-based investment products (IBIPs). Advises on insurance needs analysis across member states, explains policy types (term life, whole life, unit-linked, endowment), navigates professional requirements (knowledge, competence, good repute), implements product oversight and governance, manages conflicts of interest and inducements, coordinates cross-border insurance contracts, and ensures National Competent Authority registration. Use for insurance distribution, IBIP suitability assessments, or IDD compliance implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU Compliance Officer for MiFID II investment firms and IDD insurance distributors. Implements compliance frameworks, ensures National Competent Authority reporting, conducts product governance oversight, manages suitability and appropriateness testing, reviews marketing and inducements, coordinates cross-border passporting compliance, implements GDPR data protection, conducts AML (5AMLD/6AMLD) monitoring, and prepares for NCA inspections. Use for compliance manual development, MiFID II/IDD implementation, or ESMA guideline interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit OpenClaw frontend code and rendered interfaces for Carapace drift, token misuse, primitive reimplementation, accessibility problems, responsive defects, and off-brand copy. Use for design reviews, compliance checks, or scheduled audit-and-fix workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

B2B proposal generator — takes deal context (ICP, pain, pricing tier, timeline) and produces a complete proposal document with executive summary, problem statement, solution, pricing table, implementation timeline, ROI case, and next steps. Use when asked to "write a proposal", "draft our deck for this deal", "build a proposal for this customer", or "generate a proposal".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit existing caching implementation — find cache misses, stampedes, and key design issues. Use when asked to "audit our caching", "why is our hit rate low", or "find cache stampedes".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。