1.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Compares your Meta ad sets and identifies where audiences overlap significantly, causing your ads to compete against each other in the same auctions. Tells you exactly which ad sets are cannibalizing each other and how much it's costing you in inflated CPMs. Platform: Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit how visible your brand is inside AI answers (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews). Claude builds a prompt panel for your category, scores where you show up vs competitors, and turns the gaps into a prioritized fix list. Platform: AI visibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-change checks before handing off. Works out which checks apply from the files changed (directory AGENTS.md Checks sections and matching .agents/rules), runs or verifies each, and reports pass/fail/skipped. Use before saying work is done, before pushing, or when asked to audit or verify a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-panel split with quote as hero — white/blue panels open from center, accent bar grows, quote reveals line by line.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review or de-slop concrete changes in ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI at maintainer level: PR numbers or URLs, branches, commit ranges, patch files, staged or unstaged worktrees, and scoped repository-hygiene requests. Use for evidence-first correctness, contract, repository-rule, process, and behavior-preserving cleanup review, including debug residue, dead or duplicate code, speculative abstractions, stale comments or tests, and unrelated diff churn. Do not use for abstract designs with no concrete repository artifact; use audit for repository-wide assessments and vuln-check for security-only checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend the right TRES Finance report for any user question. Trigger this skill whenever a user asks which report to use, what report contains certain data, how to get specific information out of TRES, or compares two reports. Also trigger when the user describes a goal (e.g. "month-end close", "auditor needs proof", "tax filing", "reconciliation") without naming a specific report. Trigger phrases include "which report", "what report", "how do I export", "where can I find", "I need a report for", "what's the difference between", "best report for", "auditor asked for", or any question about getting data out of TRES Finance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create (generate) any TRES Finance report end-to-end via the tres-mcp MCP server and GraphQL — trigger the export, verify a report row was actually created (guarding against silent failures), poll until done, and return the download link. Trigger this skill on ANY report creation request, including phrases like "create a report", "generate a report", "export", "run a report", "I need a Transaction Ledger / Balances / Reconciliation / Cost Basis / Roll Forward / Staking / Audit report", "pull the data for", "download a report for", "give me a CSV/XLSX of", or whenever the user wants TRES to produce a report file. Use together with tres-report-advisor when the user is unsure which report they need.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep analysis of Git history: identify frequently changed hotspot files, analyze code ownership by contributor, and scan for leaked secrets. Triggered when users ask about Git analysis, code hotspots, who owns what code, secret scanning, security audits of commit history, or optimizing code review assignments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit Terms of Service, user agreements, and privacy policies for consumer risks, producing a structured report that flags unfair clauses, data traps, and liability issues. Trigger when a user asks to review, audit, or analyze a ToS, privacy policy, or user agreement, or mentions specific concerns like auto-renewal or data authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when setting up, auditing, or enforcing internationalization/localization in UI codebases (React/TS, i18next or similar, JSON locales), including installing/configuring the i18n framework, replacing hard-coded strings, ensuring en-US/zh-CN coverage, mapping error codes to localized messages, and validating key parity, pluralization, and formatting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Typst academic paper assistant for existing `.typ` paper projects in English or Chinese. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compile, audit, or improve a Typst paper, including format checks, bibliography validation for BibTeX or Hayagriva, grammar/sentence/logic review, expression polishing, translation, title optimization, pseudocode review, algorithm block cleanup, de-AI editing, experiment-section review, table structure validation, three-line table generation, abstract structure diagnosis, or journal adaptation. Trigger even when the user only mentions one Typst file, one bibliography issue, one pseudocode block, one section rewrite, "three-line table", "check abstract", or "reformat for another journal". Also trigger when the user mentions ".typ files", "typst compile error", "typst export", "typst bibliography", `algorithm-figure`, `lovelace`, or `algorithmic` even without saying the word "Typst" explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate the replication package for the sewage-house-prices project. Runs 10 checks covering script execution, file integrity, output freshness, dependency verification, data provenance, and README completeness (AEA format). This skill should be used when asked to "audit replication", "check the package", or "verify reproducibility".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VS-Enhanced Academic Style Auditor - Academic Writing Quality Analysis Identifies 24+ writing patterns that reduce scholarly quality, adapted from Wikipedia AI Cleanup guidelines Use when: checking drafts before submission, improving academic writing quality, preparing for style improvement Triggers: writing quality, style audit, pattern check, writing review, academic style check
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants their existing R code evaluated or audited — not when they want new analysis written. Triggers include: "review my R script", "check my R code", "is my code replication-ready", "audit this R file", "does this code follow conventions", "will this reproduce", "check my analysis script", "code review", "review-r", or when the user has an existing .R file and wants quality feedback rather than new code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step pipeline an applied economist or quantitative social scientist runs on every paper — (1) data cleaning, (2) variable construction & transformation, (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1, (4) statistical diagnostic tests, (5) baseline empirical modeling, (6) robustness battery, (7) further analysis (mechanism, heterogeneity, mediation, moderation), (8) publication-ready tables & figures. **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation via `zepid` / hand-rolled `pandas`, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `zepid` / `econml` / `lifelines`, Mendelian randomization via `pymr` / `mrtool` (or `rpy2` → `MendelianRandomization`/`TwoSampleMR`), KM / AFT / Cox survival via `lifelines`, E-value sensitivity, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `econml.dml` / `doubleml`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `econml.metalearners` / `causalml`, causal forest via `econml.grf` / `causalml`, Dragonnet / TARNet / CEVAE neural causal via `causalml`, BCF via `pymc-bart` / `bcf-py`, matrix completion, CATE distribution + policy tree via `econml.policy` / `policytree-py`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `mapie`, fairness audit via `fairlearn`, DAG learning via `causal-learn` / `cdt` / LLM-assisted). Prescribes which library to reach for at each step, shows the canonical code, and links to deeper `references/` files for variant-specific patterns. Use when the user asks for a **complete empirical analysis** in Python, wants to replicate an applied-economics paper from scratch, needs a reproducible workflow that is NOT opinionated on any single vertical package (contrast with StatsPAI), wants explicit control over every estimator and diagnostic, or asks "how do I write a full empirical pipeline in Python?". Also triggers when the user names a specific classical step in isolation — "winsorize at 1/99%", "run Breusch-Pagan", "build a Table 1 balance table", "do a placebo test", "event study plot", "mediation analysis" — and wants it wired into the broader pipeline. Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation", "IPTW", "TMLE", "Mendelian randomization", "STROBE", "公共健康", "流行病学". Mode B triggers on "DML", "double machine learning", "causal forest", "meta-learner", "Dragonnet", "BCF", "policy tree", "conformal causal", "fairness audit", "因果机器学习".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms"). Use this skill when asked to "remove AI-isms," "clean up AI writing," "edit writing for AI patterns," "audit writing for AI tells," or "make this sound less like AI." Supports a detection-only mode that flags patterns without rewriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing verification skill and feature map against source and the running app, then repair proven documentation or harness drift. Use for "maintain the verification skill", "audit the verify skill", or "refresh the verification feature map".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gate new or changed tests, and audit existing tests for low value, implementation coupling, duplication, and the test-only production seams they keep alive. Use when writing, changing, reviewing, or sweeping tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit codebases for quality, consistency, and broken patterns — use for pre-release or tech debt review
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance from code review and architecture. Use for requests to diagnose slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU/memory usage, excessive view updates, or layout thrash in SwiftUI apps, and to provide guidance for user-run Instruments profiling when code review alone is insufficient.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a project's past Codex sessions, memory files, and existing local skills to recommend the highest-value skills to create or update. Use when a user asks what skills a project needs, wants skill ideas grounded in real project history, wants an audit of current project-local skills, or wants recommendations for updating stale or incomplete skills instead of creating duplicates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep code, tests, documentation, configuration, and other changes as tight, clear, performant, and minimal as possible without weakening behavior. Use during implementation to prevent unnecessary complexity, after behavior is proven to consolidate working changes, before handoff for a full branch audit, and when asked to simplify, tighten, clean up, reduce verbosity, remove complexity, or minimize existing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, audit, and fix @legendapp/list and LegendList usage in React, React Native, and web apps. Use for virtualization, scroll blanking, mount cost, data identity, recycling, row invalidation, measurement, chat anchoring, drawDistance, visibility, or Legend List performance regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。