「assess」の検索結果

Identify, score, and mitigate delivery risks for a program or release. Use when the user says "risk review", "what could go wrong", "risk register", "delivery risks for this release", "program risk assessment", "identify blockers before they hit", or wants to pressure-test a plan before committing - even if they don't say "risk review". Based on "The Phoenix Project" by Kim, Behr & Spafford (unplanned work, fragile systems, single points of failure) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (scoping risk, milestone pressure, hidden assumptions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess team health using Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team model. Use when a leader says "my team feels off", "we have trust issues", "people aren't speaking up in meetings", "accountability is a problem", "we keep missing commitments", "the team is siloed", "we're not working well together", or "I want to do a team health check". Also trigger when someone describes symptoms like passive agreement in meetings, blame culture, missed deadlines without escalation, or people optimizing for their own metrics over team goals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether your leadership behaviors amplify or diminish your team using Liz Wiseman's Multipliers framework. Use when a leader asks "am I a good manager", "why isn't my team performing at their potential", "I feel like I'm doing all the thinking for my team", "my team seems dependent on me", "I want to be a better leader", "how do I empower my people", or "my team is smart but underperforming". Also trigger when someone describes always having the best ideas in the room, team members not taking initiative, reports waiting for direction before acting, or a leader who feels exhausted from carrying the team. Diminisher patterns are often invisible to the leader exhibiting them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Structured context analysis before acting. USE FOR: questioning assumptions, mapping dependencies, identifying blind spots, validating scope of any task or subject. Use to contextualize, question, analyze before implementing, review premises, prevent hallucination, structured assessment. DO NOT USE FOR: simple tasks where task-intent suffices, direct implementation, code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Risk awareness before action. USE FOR: assessing risks (security, data integrity, compatibility, operational, reversibility) of any task at variable depth. Accepts weight: Light (quick scan), Standard (dimensional analysis), Deep (full Risk Radar with evidence). Can be invoked multiple times in the same flow with increasing weight. DO NOT USE FOR: penetration testing, compliance audits, static security analysis tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Runs canonical batch analysis before site-wide checks. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when user says "audit blog", "blog audit", "site audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "check all blogs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Google Cloud Filestore instances across projects for disaster recovery readiness (missing or stale backups), security access governance (overly permissive NFS export rules, 0.0.0.0/0 exposure, missing ROOT_SQUASH), and reliability compliance (Physical Zone Isolation PZI and Physical Zone Separation PZS). Use when assessing storage health posture, auditing NFS export permissions, identifying unprotected file shares, or validating zone failure domains. Don't use for Cloud Storage buckets, Persistent Disk, or NetApp Volumes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes the downstream impact (blast radius) when a BigQuery table or view is broken, stale, or modified. Identifies all downstream tables, dashboards, and processes that will be affected. Use when: - Performing a blast radius or impact analysis for a BigQuery table or view. - Assessing the consequences of modifying, deleting, or pausing updates to a BigQuery asset. - Identifying downstream dependencies (tables, dashboards, processes) of a BigQuery asset. Don't use for: - General BigQuery querying or data analysis (use BigQuery-related tools instead). - Non-BigQuery assets (e.g., Cloud Storage files) unless they are part of the BigQuery lineage. - Creating or modifying lineage links directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when configuring FSC financial planning objects, designing periodic review cycles, modeling risk assessment workflows, or tracking goal progress in Financial Services Cloud. Trigger keywords: FinancialGoal, FinancialPlan, goal tracking, risk tolerance, review cycle, financial planning workflow, Discovery Framework, Revenue Insights. NOT for wealth management process discovery — use admin/wealth-management-requirements. NOT for Action Plan template mechanics — use admin/fsc-action-plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, reviewing, or troubleshooting Salesforce metadata releases and admin deployment processes. Triggers: 'change set', 'deployment plan', 'rollback', 'DevOps Center', 'SFDX deploy', 'release checklist', 'production deployment', 'validation only deploy', 'quick deploy', 'test level', 'rollbackOnError', 'destructive changes', 'package.xml for an admin release', 'deployment status'. NOT for change set upload mechanics — use devops/change-set-deployment. NOT for scoring release risk up front — use admin/deployment-risk-assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when planning user adoption, structuring Salesforce training materials, drafting release communications, or running a change impact assessment for a Salesforce rollout or update. Triggers: user adoption plan, training materials, release announcement, change impact, go-live communication, communication plan, training plan by persona, adoption metrics, LoginHistory adoption report, PromptAction, training sandbox, go-live checklist, post-go-live feedback, super user program, pilot group. NOT for org deployment mechanics or sandbox promotion — use admin/change-management-and-deployment. NOT for adoption of an Agentforce or Einstein AI feature — use admin/ai-adoption-change-management. NOT for configuring the in-app prompts themselves — use admin/in-app-guidance-and-walkthroughs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, or audit a Change Advisory Board (CAB) process for Salesforce deployments: change classification (standard, normal, emergency), required approvals, deployment gate sequencing, and integration with external ITSM tooling. NOT for scoring how risky one release is - use admin/deployment-risk-assessment. NOT for executing or troubleshooting the deployment itself - use admin/change-management-and-deployment. Also covers: the CAB charter (membership, quorum, decision rights), the CAB decision record artefact and its linter, the change classification matrix, the deployOptions a CAB decision pins (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, runTests), the 10-day quick-deploy validity window, the deploy-window vs freeze-register check, and the emergency (ECAB) path with its mandatory retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ออกแบบคอร์สออนไลน์ตั้งแต่ curriculum, lesson plan, assessment, จนถึง sales page พร้อมวางแผน completion rate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan or review software architecture through a small expert panel. Use when the user explicitly asks for architecture planning, system design, technical strategy, an architecture assessment, a design review, or a system health review. Do not use for ordinary PR review, debugging, or implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and ideation partner for GAME DESIGN — think through design ideas before writing them into the GDD; produces a brief, never edits the GDD itself. Use to assess a genre or market for viability, dissect a reference game (mechanics → dynamics → aesthetics), explore how to improve or extend an existing system, flow, or content type, research new mechanics the design lacks, investigate a part of the GDD in code, or develop the research bucket of a /unikit-gd-review report into decided edits. Trigger on "explore how to improve the flow", "ways to improve the combat system", "is this genre saturated", "break down the combat of Hades", "work out the review's open questions". GAME-DESIGN research only — for CODE or technical research use /unikit-explore; to reconstruct a design from code use /unikit-gd-recon; to write a change into the GDD use /unikit-gd-system or /unikit-gd-spec; to apply edits you know use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a new game use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing body fat percentage from skinfold measurements, calculating body density, or interpreting body composition results using Durnin-Womersley or Jackson-Pollock equations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized GitHub PR intelligence agent for automatically gathering comprehensive context from Pull Requests. Activate when users need CI failure analysis, review comment investigation, or PR status assessment. Triggers on requests like "CI 실패 원인 찾아줘", "gather review comments", "check PR status", "analyze PR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured AI readiness audit for any organization. Scores 8 dimensions, identifies gaps, produces a prioritized 90-day action plan with budget ranges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete career acceleration system — from self-assessment to offer negotiation. Covers career strategy, job search operations, resume/CV optimization, interview preparation, salary negotiation, career transitions, and long-term growth planning. Works for any role, any level, any industry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, Toxicity) prediction for drug candidates. Use for assessing drug-likeness, PK properties, and safety risks early in drug discovery. Keywords: ADMET, PK, toxicity, drug-likeness, DILI, hERG, bioavailability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess ad account readiness and risk status across Meta (Facebook/Instagram), Google Ads, TikTok Ads, YouTube Ads, Amazon Ads, and DSP/programmatic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。