「audit」の検索結果

审计网站是否符合阿塞拜疆《个人数据法》（Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ），并在适用时符合欧盟 GDPR 以及 ePrivacy/饼干同意规则。盘点存在的隐私文件（隐私政策、饼干政策、饼干横幅、同意流程、控制者和 DPO 联系方式、数据主体权利渠道、跨境转移披露、AZ 运营者登记引用），并对照适用的法定要求逐项评分。产出双层报告：面向企业主的通俗语言红绿灯摘要，外加面向律师的逐条款发现表（带条款级引用）。仅评估 — 不起草。每当用户分享针对阿塞拜疆或面向阿塞拜疆网站的 URL 或隐私/饼干政策文本时使用；当用户提及 .az 域名、Law 998、AZ 国家登记簿、ePrivacy、第 27 条欧盟代表，或询问"is my site GDPR compliant"、"do I need to register as an operator in Azerbaijan"或"is our cookie banner lawful"时也使用 — 即使没有"audit"一词。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

v09-audit-evidence-map

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

i18n-leak-audit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered conversion rate optimization: landing page audits, CRO scoring, survey segmentation, and lead magnet generation. Use when asked to audit a landing page, run a CRO analysis, segment survey responses, or generate lead magnets. For content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-stack security review — auditing vulnerabilities across infrastructure, smart contracts, CI/CD pipelines, and AI agent systems, plus auth/sessions/crypto and validating user input at API and infrastructure boundaries. Triggers on mentions of "vulnerability", "pentest", "OWASP", "access control", "injection", "CSRF", "JWT", "smart contract audit", "supply chain", "OIDC", or any review of security-sensitive code paths spanning more than one layer. For PII sanitization see [security](../security/SKILL.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or auditing a library of Claude Code skills, agents, slash commands, and workflows — frontmatter correctness, routing quality, tool allowlists, command arg-hints, workflow meta/phase coherence, cross-reference coherence, single-responsibility, file structure, and anti-pattern detection. Triggers on mentions of "review skills", "audit agents", "skill library", "agent definition review", "review this command", "review this workflow", "is this skill right", or when iterating on `.claude/skills/`, `.claude/agents/`, `.claude/commands/`, or `.claude/workflows/` directories. For code review of source code see code-review-and-quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code auditor that grades software projects and the agents/developers who built them. Produces structured JSON + Markdown reports with a standardized rubric. Evaluates architecture, correctness, testing, authorship cohesiveness, ghost code, and more. Optionally ingests tmux session logs for process evidence and interrogates agents about specific problems found. Use when asked to "audit", "grade", "evaluate", "review code quality", "rate this project", "score the agents", or "assess the codebase". Especially useful after Marcus multi-agent experiments to grade agent output and track quality over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate system-improvement loop — audit your own Claude Code setup (rules / memory / skills / MCP / agents / registry), evaluate incoming tools via /vet, adopt the worthwhile ones with discipline (backup → verify), and record every decision. Use when bringing in a tool/idea/collection to improve the setup, or when doing a tooling-improvement pass. Triggers — "upgrade the workflow", "audit our setup", "let's improve the tooling", "evaluate this for us", when handed a post/repo/reel with a tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous goal loop — give it ONE goal plus how to verify it, the agent runs check→fix→check itself and comes back only with the finished result (code with audit, research with fact-check, content with critique, audit/backtest). Self-verification instead of constant supervision, with hard safety guards. Vary the loop with a verification rubric designed before it runs. Triggers — "work autonomously to the result", "don't come back until it's done", "run the loop yourself", "drive it to done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preventive hygiene audit of your own Claude Code configuration — memory files, project context (CLAUDE.md), rules, permissions, skills — a deterministic scan of sizes / broken links / stale entries / excessive permissions / junk + interpretation + targeted fixes by agreement. Keeps the setup from rotting before it breaks. Triggers — "check the system", "system health", "workflow hygiene", "what to clean up", "audit memory", "optimize the system".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit agent runtimes and their tests for lifecycle inference, capability overload, context pollution, correlated verification, prompt-only control, false success, dead compatibility paths, test-only seams, and complexity without contribution. Use for whole-repository agent audits, slop or dead-code triage, test contribution reviews, large refactors, tool/context simplification, and cleanup requests that need proof before deleting code or tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6-lens diagnostic slop audit — unused imports, dead private fns, duplicate signatures, abandoned TODOs, lint bypass markers, stale refs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope, preregister, execute, audit, normalize, and publish GEODE evaluations with research-question, reproduction, attempt-lineage, trajectory, verifier-receipt, and immutable artifact contracts. Use for benchmark runs or comparisons, eval-artifact and cache-accounting audits, GPT or subscription result normalization, research question or hypothesis framing, retry diagnosis, trajectory publication, DPO or reward-data readiness reviews, and requests involving MCPMark, tau2, BFCL, Agent-World, HAL, Terminal-Bench, or Toolathlon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrastructure-first security audit (OWASP, secrets, dependencies).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revisa los cambios de UI en cuanto a accesibilidad — contraste de color, navegación por teclado, gestión del foco, uso de ARIA y texto alternativo. Úsalo cuando la persona pida una revisión de a11y/accesibilidad, verificar el cumplimiento de WCAG, el soporte de teclado, la compatibilidad con lectores de pantalla o el manejo del foco (p. ej. "¿es accesible este modal?", "audita la a11y del formulario").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Gestalt psychology principles to web layout, spacing, grouping, and visual hierarchy. Proximity, similarity, closure, continuity, figure-ground, common fate, Pragnanz — translated into CSS, component structure, and information architecture. Activate on 'gestalt', 'visual grouping', 'proximity spacing', 'visual hierarchy', 'perceptual organization', 'layout psychology', 'whitespace strategy'. NOT for color theory (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), not for accessibility auditing (use design-accessibility-auditor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Managing third-party dependencies — version pinning, security auditing, license compliance, update workflows, lockfile management, supply chain security. Activate on "npm audit", "dependabot", "renovate", "pin versions", "dependency update", "supply chain", "license compliance", "lockfile", "security advisory", "typosquatting", "SBOM". NOT for internal monorepo package management (use monorepo-management) or publishing your own packages to npm/PyPI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA compliance with automated testing, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, and focus management. Activate on: accessibility audit, WCAG compliance, keyboard navigation, screen reader, aria attributes, axe-core, focus trap. NOT for: design-level accessibility review (use design-accessibility-auditor), color contrast only (use css-in-js-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of the project's agent-tree structural overhead vs the context window. NOT for cost tracking (budget skill); NOT for read/compact decisions (mk:context-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runtime router for context decisions: read-more/stop/ask/assume/delegate, minimal read-set, compaction timing. Model: Write/Select/Compress/Isolate. NOT for agent-tree overhead audit (context-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。