「invest」の検索結果

Parse and analyze email headers to trace the origin of phishing emails, verify sender authenticity, and identify spoofing through SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query to detect suspicious administrative operations, impossible travel, privilege escalation, and resource modifications. Builds KQL queries for threat hunting in Azure environments. Use when investigating suspicious Azure tenant activity or building cloud SIEM detections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage PostHog error tracking issues during a daily or on-call review. Use when the user asks "what's broken?", "what new errors do we have?", "show me top errors today", "what should I look at this morning", or wants a prioritized list of active issues to work on. Surfaces new and high-impact issues, ranks by users affected and recency, points at linked replays, and proposes next actions (investigate, assign, suppress, merge).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose why a product metric changed (dropped, spiked, or plateaued) by orchestrating breakdowns, actors, paths, lifecycle, retention, and annotations queries. Use when the user reports an anomaly, asks "why did X change?", or needs root-cause analysis for a trend, funnel, retention, stickiness, or lifecycle metric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability evaluations of both types — `hog` (deterministic code-based) and `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual pass/fail results, and generate AI-powered summaries of patterns across many runs. Use when the user asks to debug why an evaluation is failing, surface common failure modes, compare results across filters, dry-run a Hog evaluator, prototype a new LLM-judge prompt, or manage the evaluation lifecycle (create, update, enable/disable, delete).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates distributed application performance using PostHog APM (OpenTelemetry span) data via MCP. Use when the user asks about service traces, slow HTTP/database spans, error spans, trace IDs, or span attributes — not AI observability traces or product logs. Uses posthog:query-apm-spans, posthog:apm-trace-get, posthog:apm-services-list, posthog:apm-attributes-list, and posthog:apm-attribute-values-list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch multiple explore subagents in parallel to investigate architecture, data models, auth, APIs, and deployment. Synthesize into an onboarding document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall project-first and global-supplement ChatCrystal memories before substantive implementation, refactoring, migration, configuration, investigation, or optimization work. Use when the task is non-trivial, has repository or project context, and prior fixes, decisions, pitfalls, or reusable patterns may change the approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses what a page's heatmap is telling you and recommends concrete changes. Pulls click / rageclick / scroll-depth data for a URL, names the hot elements by cross-referencing autocapture events on the same page, and can create a saved heatmap the user opens in PostHog, then summarizes the behavior and proposes improvements. TRIGGER when: user asks what a heatmap shows, why people aren't clicking something, where users rage-click, how far they scroll, what to change on a page based on heatmap/click data, or to 'analyze/assess/review the heatmap' for a URL. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user only wants to create a saved heatmap screenshot with no analysis (use heatmaps-saved-create directly), or is asking about session replay in general (use investigating-replay).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drug safety and adverse event analysis — FAERS spontaneous-report mining, FDA black-box warnings, signal detection (PRR, ROR, IC), risk factors by demographic/comorbidity, and label change tracking. Use for post-market safety surveillance, AE signal investigation, drug-AE association strength scoring, and pharmacovigilance reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive drug profiling — mechanism, primary/secondary targets, drug interactions, clinical-trial status, adverse events (FAERS), pharmacogenomics, and approval history. Use for full drug investigation reports, 'tell me about drug X' queries, and assembling drug profiles for clinicians, researchers, or regulatory work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write clear, testable acceptance criteria in Given-When-Then format following INVEST principles and BDD best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read current Unity Console entries from a running Editor. Use during bug investigation after compile, tests, PlayMode, or dynamic code to inspect logs, warnings, errors, and stack traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when arranging the project quality-check or investigating a concrete unresolved code concern

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a GitHub issue that already has the cc-issue-created label and is assumed ready to start. Inspect the comment history first to decide whether human confirmation is needed (cc-need-human-check, highest priority — reserved for issue-level deadlock, or for confirmation items answer-issue-questions already investigated and explicitly marked unanswerable); otherwise close the issue as not needed, delegate unanswered confirmation items in the last comment or the description to answer-issue-questions (cc-answer-issue-questions), refresh a description stale relative to settled comment-history content (cc-update-issue), or move to execution (cc-exec-issue). Any UI-changing issue is routed to the design-first flow (cc-create-ui-design) before execution; the exceptions are an issue whose description already names the .pen design to implement against, and a minor UI change that introduces no new visual decision (no new screen/section, no layout change, no new reusable component, no visual expression outside existing design tokens/components). Design files are never edited in the implementation PR. Dependency checks are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns isolate identity at the right resolution for the question -- ANI / Mash species triage, 7-locus MLST historical comparability, cgMLST / wgMLST outbreak resolution (chewBBACA, BIGSdb, Ridom SeqSphere, EnteroBase HierCC), in-silico serotyping (SISTR, SeqSero2 for Salmonella; SerotypeFinder for E. coli; Kaptive K/O for Klebsiella; SeroBA for pneumococcus; spa + SCCmec for S. aureus), and lineage callers (TB-Profiler / Mykrobe Coll-Napier barcode for MTBC, Pangolin + Nextclade for SARS-CoV-2, PopPUNK GPSC for S. pneumoniae). Use when typing bacterial isolates for surveillance or outbreak investigation, choosing between cgMLST allele distance and core-SNP distance for cluster definition, harmonising calls across schemas / database versions (chewBBACA vs Ridom vs EnteroBase), assigning MTBC lineage with the Napier 2020 90-SNP barcode, calling Salmonella serovar via SISTR with monophasic Typhimurium awareness, running Pangolin UShER mode with explicit pangolin-data version pinning, or selecting a typing resolution to match the surveillance question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。