Security architecture and implementation patterns. Use when designing security controls, implementing authentication/authorization, conducting threat modeling, or ensuring compliance with security frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,733 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Security architecture and implementation patterns. Use when designing security controls, implementing authentication/authorization, conducting threat modeling, or ensuring compliance with security frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically find relevant context from knowledge graph and code relationships while coding. Detects when context would be helpful (new files, unfamiliar code, architectural decisions) and surfaces related entities, prior decisions, and code dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dependency management specialist. Use when updating dependencies, scanning for vulnerabilities, analyzing dependency trees, or ensuring license compliance. Handles npm, pip, maven, and other package managers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Email operations skill for sending, fetching, and reading emails via IMAP/SMTP. Uses curl with OpenSSL/LibreSSL for reliable TLS compatibility with Tencent Enterprise Mail and other providers. Credentials are securely stored in macOS Keychain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Skills meta-skill: extract domain material (docs/APIs/code/specs) into a reusable Skill (SKILL.md + references/scripts/assets), and refactor existing Skills for clarity, activation reliability, and quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal discipline for any LM-driven loop — agent retries, plan-act-observe, multi-agent handoffs, optimiser passes, test-fix cycles. Encodes the one rule every framework documents quietly and every team relearns expensively: the LM in the loop is NEVER a reliable terminator. Termination must be provided by an explicit counter + exit predicate + stagnation signal + escalation path that live OUTSIDE the LM's control. This is a tool- level, framework-agnostic skill. It maps onto LangGraph (recursion_limit + state counter + interrupt), CrewAI (max_iter + max_rpm + human_input), Claude / OpenAI SDKs (max_iterations + tool_use_budget), DSPy (declared evaluation budget), Aider (REPL + explicit retry cap), and AutoGen (max_consecutive_auto_reply). Search keywords: infinite loop, recursion limit, recursion_limit, GraphRecursionError, max iterations, max_iter, agent stuck, agent won't stop, runaway agent, ReAct loop not terminating, agent repeating itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for writing, loading, and evolving a project-level convention file (CONVENTIONS.md / CLAUDE.md / .cursor/rules / .clinerules / AGENTS.md) so that a coder-agent reliably respects your codebase's style choices every session. Tool-agnostic; covers the four load mechanics (read-only attachment, ancestor-walk auto-load, glob-scoped rules, agent backstory) and the conflict resolution between pinned conventions and the existing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A 5-minute gate the coder runs at project kickoff (and again whenever the repo shape changes). Classifies the workspace into Greenfield / Brownfield-large / Mid-size-familiar / Library-SDK, then maps the state to an agent strategy (autonomy, context primitive, tool choice). Use BEFORE picking Cursor vs Claude Code vs Aider, BEFORE turning on repo-map, BEFORE writing the first prompt. Skip only if the same repo was gated within the last day and nothing changed. Search keywords: greenfield vs brownfield, new project vs existing codebase, project setup strategy, legacy codebase agent, where to start a coding agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-kickoff rubric for the self-host vs managed-cloud decision — when is running your own inference engine / LLM platform worth the ops cost vs paying per-token for a managed API? Decide on two axes — VOLUME (a cost-crossover slider) and COMPLIANCE (a hard gate). Use at kickoff when choosing where to run inference, or when cost / data-residency pressure forces a re-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a compliant Chinese mathematical-modeling problem-restatement chapter from a complete problem statement, or review a user's restatement against the original problem. Covers research background, problem review, and research overview; does not perform the separate problem-analysis chapter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a complete mathematical-modeling competition paper with an atomic checklist covering abstract readability, page structure, typography, headings, pagination, figures, tables, equations, anonymity, metadata, visual balance, and page allocation. Return the review in chat or Markdown by default, and provide the bundled single-sheet checklist when the user requests a reusable form. Use when the user provides a PDF or Word paper and asks for a full-paper format and writing-compliance audit; do not replace technical model correctness review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web accessibility patterns for news and academic sites. Use for WCAG audits, alt text, accessible data viz, and assistive tech.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scholarly writing and research compliance. Use for CRediT, preregistration, Plan S, Nelson Memo, preprints, ORCID, LLM disclosure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tax-loss harvesting opportunity identification, scoring, and planning with wash sale compliance and annual carryforward tracking
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability in production. Use when optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized skill for nondominium Holochain DNA development, focusing on zome creation, entry patterns, integrity/coordinator architecture, ValueFlows compliance, and WASM optimization. Use when creating new zomes, implementing entry types, or modifying Holochain DNA code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement GitOps workflows with ArgoCD and Flux for automated, declarative Kubernetes deployments with continuous reconciliation. Use when implementing GitOps practices, automating Kubernetes deployments, or setting up declarative infrastructure management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when reviewing or editing copy to ensure adherence to Every's style guide. It provides a systematic line-by-line review process for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and style guide compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review documentation changes for compliance with the Metabase writing style guide. Use when reviewing pull requests, files, or diffs containing documentation markdown files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-implementation confidence assessment (≥90% required). Use before starting any implementation to verify readiness with duplicate check, architecture compliance, official docs verification, OSS references, and root cause identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。