2,820 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Orchestrates the dedicated Kinect wall harp implementation team. Use whenever the user asks to build, implement, continue, fix, QA, document, or ship the Kinect wall harp, Kinect v2 wall-depth harp, FreenectTD depth-blob hand tracking, projected wall strings, pluck synth harp, or this feature's Layer 1 tool/recipe/docs. Use this before the generic tdmcp-pipeline for this feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and implement native RayTK (t3kt/raytk) raymarching/SDF toolkit integration into tdmcp — beyond the existing package-manager staging, into AI-driven RayTK operator (ROP) node graphs. Use whenever the user wants to build, plan, design, implement, continue, fix, QA, or ship RayTK support: create/wire RayTK ROPs, a RayTK operator knowledge catalog, a RayTK-native raymarch/SDF scene tool, RayTK recipes, or the RayTK setup/doctor flow — including follow-ups (re-run, continue, refresh after a new RayTK release, re-QA, docs). Also triggers on 'raytk', 'raymarching toolkit', 'SDF toolkit', 't3kt', 'montar um build para o raytk', 'integrar o raytk'. This owns RayTK integration specifically; use it before the generic tdmcp-pipeline for this feature. Simple questions about RayTK can be answered directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a whole tdmcp feature BACKLOG to completion as resumable, wave-by-wave releases — the campaign layer ABOVE tdmcp-pipeline/tdmcp-feature-lead. Use whenever the user wants to implement an ENTIRE backlog or discovery file (e.g. _workspace/discovery*/FEATURE_BACKLOG*.md), 'all the features', many features across multiple releases, or a long autonomous build campaign, AND for every follow-up: continue/resume the campaign, run the next wave, re-run a failed wave, fold in QA results, or check campaign status. Backed by a ledger.json so re-running is idempotent (skips shipped work, resumes interrupted work) and resilient (retry-once then quarantine-and-continue). For a SINGLE feature or one small batch, use tdmcp-pipeline instead; this skill is for the whole ledger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Study a merged or shipped tdmcp implementation and extract reusable learnings: code improvements, runtime/UX lessons, test gaps, docs updates, roadmap items, and harness changes. Use when the user asks to learn from a completed feature/project/PR/build, analyze what can be improved from an implementation, or turn a real installation experience into actionable tdmcp improvements. This is a post-implementation learning harness; it does not replace tdmcp-pipeline for building or tdmcp-quality-audit for broad repo audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomously work a `.pm` workstream to completion — pick the next pending milestone, implement every task end to end, /ship it, then move to the next until none remain. Use when the user asks to "loop", drain, or work through a whole workstream's backlog (e.g. `/loop-worker w1`). Sequential, not interval-based; for a timed poll use /loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a client report, a monthly or activity report, a case study draft, or says 'what did i ship this month'. Turns the site audit log into a written report in one of six framings: agency client report, case study, internal recap, testimonial draft, build-in-public, personal recap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says 'build internal links', 'improve internal linking', 'fix orphaned pages', or 'create topic clusters'. Analyzes all published content, maps topic relationships, and presents a linking plan for approval before changing anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive code simulation engine that spawns ghost personas to review your code before it ships. Each ghost walks through your code line-by-line from a different failure perspective: The Adversary (race conditions, double-submit, idempotency), The Enterprise Edge (business logic gaps, multi-currency, B2B tax exemptions, locale), Chaos Monkey (timeouts, partial failures, network partitions, OOM). Produces a chaos timeline, structured bug report with severity ratings, and three resolution tiers (quick fix, robust architecture, generated test suite). Use this skill whenever the user mentions code review, PR review, "find bugs", "what could go wrong", "will this break", "is this safe", "stress test", "edge cases", design review, pre-merge check, dry run, chaos test, or wants a second opinion on any code — even if they don't explicitly ask for "ghost personas" or "simulation". Also trigger when someone pastes a code snippet with any question about its correctness or safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rates any SKILL.md on a 0-100 scale across 10 dimensions with a SHIP / REWORK / SCRAP verdict. Evaluates trigger precision, instruction clarity, output predictability, edge case coverage, anti-hallucination guardrails, developer experience, composability, open-source readiness, wow factor, and real-world utility. No flattery — calibrated against Anthropic's own skill-creator rubric. Use this skill whenever someone says "score this skill", "rate my skill", "is this skill good", "skill review", "skill audit", "roast my SKILL.md", "grade this", "will this skill work", "evaluate my skill", "how good is this", or pastes a SKILL.md and asks for feedback. Also trigger when comparing two skills, benchmarking a skill collection, or asking "what's wrong with this skill" — even without the word "score".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open or update one GitHub pull request for the current work: a conventional-commits title and a description that always includes why and benefits, and never a second PR for the same head. Use when the user asks to open a PR, create a pull request, update or refresh the PR description, ship the branch, or "make a PR". On the default branch, create a new branch first. If this head already has a PR, edit it — do not create another. Do not open a PR unless the user asked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Derive this project's own integration conventions from what the code already does, draft them as a wiring contract, and hold new work to it. Closes the built-but-not-wired gap at L3 (walking skeleton) — a mechanism that ships and is never called reads green in every other check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Stylelint in .NET repositories that ship CSS, SCSS, or other stylesheet assets alongside web frontends. Use when a repo needs a dedicated CLI lint gate for selectors, properties, duplicate styles, naming conventions, or design-system rule enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use HTMLHint in .NET repositories that ship static HTML output or standalone frontend templates. Use when a repo needs a focused CLI lint gate for DOM structure, invalid attributes, and basic HTML correctness checks on static pages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ESLint in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript, TypeScript, React, or other Node-based frontend assets. Use when a repo needs a configurable CLI lint gate for frontend correctness, import hygiene, unsafe patterns, or framework-specific rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. Nested `.editorconfig` files are allowed when they serve a clear subtree-specific purpose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use webhint in .NET repositories that ship browser-facing frontends. Use when a repo needs CLI audits for accessibility, performance, security headers, PWA signals, SEO, or runtime page quality against a served site or built frontend output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use SonarJS-derived rules in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript or TypeScript frontends and need deeper bug-risk, code-smell, or cognitive-complexity checks than a minimal ESLint baseline. Use when the repo wants `eslint-plugin-sonarjs` locally or already runs SonarQube or SonarCloud in CI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Biome in .NET repositories that ship Node-based frontend assets and want a fast combined formatter-linter-import organizer for JavaScript, TypeScript, CSS, JSON, GraphQL, or HTML. Use when a repo prefers a modern all-in-one CLI over a larger ESLint plus Prettier style stack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when opening, merging, or releasing a PR for imp - branching off main, `gh pr create`, enabling auto-merge, writing the PR body or a CHANGELOG entry, cutting a tagged release (version bump + CHANGELOG + tag + GitHub release). Symptoms - "PR stuck BLOCKED", "my last commit didn't land on main", "which check is required", "how do I cut a release", "auto-merge merged too early", "check-release failed", "STALE.md blocks git pull". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing) or perf measurement / baseline refresh (benchmark-cuda).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing the imp codebase for structural debt, dead code, god-objects/files, duplication, flag sprawl, or deciding whether a cleanup is worth shipping - "structure audit", "tech debt", "is this still used", "dead code", "refactor for clarity", "should we split this file", "remove this flag", "file size gate red", "alloc sites gate red". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing), perf/kernel work (benchmark-cuda / sm120-cuda-expert), or output quality (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, moving or auditing any .md in imp - deciding which file a paragraph belongs in, adding a doc, fixing a stale claim, or when docs_lint.py fails in CI. Covers the four reader layers (L0 README / L1 operators / L2 kernel devs / L3 agents), the HTML-comment metadata header, [PROV:] provenance, the single-source-of-truth map, generated perf blocks, which numbers may appear in prose, plan-doc closure. Triggers on "which doc does this go in", "docs lint failed", "add a doc", "this claim is stale", "update the README", "PROV block", "layer", "STALE.md". Do NOT use for the CHANGELOG or a release body (shipping-prs), or for code-comment accuracy (codebase-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates dilutive impact of equity issuance on existing shareholders with EPS, ownership, and NAV per share analysis. Use when modeling dilution, communicating shareholder impact, or comparing capital raise alternatives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates multi-investor rounds with allocation, lead/follow dynamics, and information rights structuring. Use when syndicating rounds, managing co-investor relationships, or structuring investor groups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。