5,899 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Vulnerability analysis: OWASP Top 10, current threat landscape, supply chain security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization. Use for security audits. NOT for STRIDE/CSO infra audits (mk:cso).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only audit of .codex/ structural overhead: 'remove X save Y tokens' vs the context window. NOT for cost tracking (budget skill); NOT for runtime read/compact decisions (mk:context-engineering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime router for context decisions: read-more/stop/ask/assume/delegate, minimal read-set, compaction timing. Model: Write/Select/Compress/Isolate. NOT for .codex/ overhead audit (mk:context-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing UI components, creating design systems, reviewing visual design, or checking accessibility compliance. Triggers on "design system", "UI review", "color palette", "font pairing", "accessibility audit", "responsive design", "WCAG check". Auto-activates when ui-ux-designer agent is working. Data-driven: 160 palettes, 73 font pairings, 161 product types, 98 UX guidelines, 25 chart types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing harness trace logs to surface recurring failure patterns and suggest harness improvements. Scatter-gather pattern across last N runs with mandatory HITL gate before any change is applied. Triggers on /mk:trace-analyze, "analyze traces", "find patterns in harness runs", or after a model upgrade flagged dead-weight-audit-needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP Top 10 baseline + current threat landscape awareness, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization. Use when performing security audits, threat modeling, or OWASP reviews. NOT for STRIDE/CSO-mode infrastructure audits (see mk:cso).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime router for context decisions during a task — decide read-more / stop / ask / assume / delegate, pick a minimal read-set, and time compaction. Front-page mental model is Write / Select / Compress / Isolate; a lazy pattern index routes to 25 context-engineering patterns, one reference per decision. Use when context is near budget, a long session is degrading, you must choose what to read for a task, or you are deciding /compact vs /clear vs a sub-agent. NOT for structural .claude/ overhead audits (see mk:context-audit); NOT for owning persistence (see mk:memory); NOT for USD cost (see mk:budget).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit npm dependencies for security and updates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit agent dependencies and references
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a swarm plan wave by wave with filesystem isolation via git worktrees. For each wave, main context decides the scenario recipe + implementation contract for every task, then spawns one swarm-worker per task in parallel. Each worker executes its recipe and reports JSON status. Worktree merge-audit verifies write-set discipline before changes land on main. Aborts remaining waves on any audit or task failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AWS security posture assessment using AWS CLI and security best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and designs iOS/macOS/watchOS/visionOS interfaces against the Apple Human Interface Guidelines, including the Liquid Glass design language (announced WWDC25, shipped with iOS 26/macOS Tahoe, Sept 2025). Use when reviewing an Apple-platform mockup or app for HIG compliance, checking contrast or tap-target sizes, or designing native-feeling Apple UI (e.g., 'audit my iOS app against the HIG', 'is this text readable on Liquid Glass?').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches. AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct audits, identify barriers, and provide remediation guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-angle review of responses before delivery. Audits from 4 perspectives -- factual accuracy, logical consistency, completeness, and safety. Use for high-stakes responses where errors have real consequences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frontend UI design, critique, audit, polish. Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit datasets, joins, labels, and ground truth before analysis or modeling. Use when data meaning, row grain, time semantics, source-of-truth reliability, or label construction may invalidate conclusions; not for general model evaluation after the evidence base is already trusted.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit npm or pip dependencies for outdated packages and known vulnerabilities. Use when checking package health, preparing for a release, reviewing dependencies before merging a PR, or when asked about outdated packages or security advisories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit project dependencies for known vulnerabilities (CVEs)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the rule set is over the Augment budget, when a new rule would breach it, or when asked to audit / merge / prune rules — runs the audit pipeline and proposes a verdict per rule.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。