「quality」の検索結果

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or maintaining UI design systems, design tokens, component documentation, responsive calculations, quality checks, or design-dev handoff materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive codebase health analysis. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, checking dependencies, or assessing project structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade web frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user explicitly asks to build or substantially redesign a web component, page, or application. Only applies when repository inspection confirms that the visual surface is a browser-rendered web UI. Do not use for native or GPU-rendered graphics, shaders, games, terminal UIs, or other non-web visual systems. Ignore incidental mentions and traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete testing strategy covering TDD workflow, test pyramid, unit/integration/E2E/property testing, framework best practices (Jest, Vitest, pytest), mock strategies, and CI integration. Use when writing tests, reviewing test quality, or establishing testing standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate images via Codex CLI's built-in image_gen tool (gpt-image-2). OAuth auth — no API key needed. Codex CLI의 내장 image_gen 도구로 이미지 생성. OAuth 인증으로 API 키 불필요. Usage: /codex-image cherry blossom hanok, /codex-image --size 1024x1536 space cat, /codex-image --quality high seoul night

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts Mermaid diagrams from markdown files and generates high-quality PNG images using bundled scripts. Activates when working with Mermaid diagrams, converting diagrams to PNG, extracting diagrams from markdown, or processing markdown files with embedded Mermaid code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to find high-quality dividend growth stocks (12%+ annual dividend growth, 1.5%+ yield) that are experiencing temporary pullbacks, identified by RSI oversold conditions (RSI ≤40). This skill combines fundamental dividend analysis with technical timing indicators to identify buying opportunities in strong dividend growers during short-term weakness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, summarize, and extract insights from DeLive transcription sessions. Use when: user mentions DeLive, transcription, meeting transcripts, live captions, audio transcription, AI correction, corrected transcript, or transcript analysis; user wants to search, retrieve, summarize, correct, or process recorded transcripts; user asks about meeting notes, action items, discussion summaries, or transcript quality from DeLive. Requires DeLive app running locally with its MCP server or REST API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fundamental Analysis Agent — valuation, growth, profitability, balance sheet, competitive moat, and management quality analysis with Fundamental Score (0-100)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a complete Google Ads keyword strategy with search intent mapping, ad group structure, match type recommendations, negative keyword lists, estimated CPC ranges, Quality Score optimization, and ready-to-implement campaign architecture

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, polish, and quality-check editable undergraduate or graduate thesis defense PowerPoint decks from a local thesis PDF/LaTeX project and an existing PPTX template. Use when the user asks for a formal defense PPT, thesis presentation, academic答辩PPT, template-matched PPTX, or local PowerPoint deck generation with visual inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess an openai-guardrails-python GitHub issue or pull request as a maintainer. Use to verify the claimed need and practical impact, compare supported alternatives or competing approaches, separate code quality from repository readiness, recommend the maintainer action, and draft a copy-ready comment when evidence, changes, or closure should be requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-stack autonomous math modeling agent for CUMCM (全国大学生数学建模竞赛). Reads the problem statement and data, iterates through research → coding → verification → LaTeX writing, and produces a publication-quality PDF paper. Use when the user provides a CUMCM problem and wants end-to-end automated modeling, coding, and paper generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO pages that rank on Google AND get cited by LLMs. Uses live SERP data, 500-token chunk architecture, RAG optimization for Gemini 3.5 Flash, the Two-Gate AEO framework (retrieval-pool entry + selected-citation extraction), the Anti-NLP Stuffing Protocol (structural entity placement, no keyword-density stuffing), strict single-service local isolation, and the Reddit Test quality gate. Triggers on: "write an SEO page", "seo-agi", "seo page for [keyword]", "rank for [keyword]", "rewrite this page for SEO", "GEO", "AEO", "write a page that ranks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。