2,688 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Read and search messages, channels, and threads in the user's Slack workspace. Use to catch up on team discussions and decisions, post channel messages, and reply to coworkers through Slack's official MCP server.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Zoom meetings, calls, recordings, and transcripts. Use to catch up on missed calls, summarize decisions, and extract action items and owners; also work with Team Chat, Canvas, Tasks, Whiteboard, Hub, and Revenue Accelerator through Zoom's official MCP servers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for feedback and feature requests to the Muse team. Whenever your response tells the user you can't do a specific thing they wanted, or accepts them giving up on one, offer once to file feedback in that response. This covers missing integrations you can't do yourself, capabilities you lack, and tasks that keep failing at a specific point. File only on their go-ahead. Also use when asked to send, view, check, or withdraw feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze cybersecurity threat intelligence, triage security alerts, classify IOCs, map attacks to MITRE ATT&CK kill chain, reduce false positives, and attribute threat actors. Covers SIEM tuning, threat feed quality, detection coverage gaps, Diamond Model analysis, and strategic threat assessments for SOC and incident response teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit ML experiment tracking infrastructure for reproducibility gaps, parameter logging completeness, metric capture, artifact management, and pipeline orchestration. Covers MLflow, Weights and Biases, DVC, Sacred, Neptune, Hydra configs, model registries, and produces a reproducibility scorecard (0-30) with actionable fixes for data science teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit mental health crisis monitoring systems for risk signal detection accuracy, escalation protocol completeness, safety planning integration, crisis team coordination, and ethical guardrail enforcement..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a penetration test scope document. Use when the user says "pentest scope", "pen test scope document", "penetration testing scope", "scope of engagement", "rules of engagement", "what to include in a pentest", "security assessment scope", "red team scope", "bug bounty scope", or needs to define the boundaries, objectives, and rules for a penetration testing engagement - even if they don't explicitly say "scope".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a roadmap or backlog to distinguish outcomes from outputs. Use when the user says "outcome vs output", "escaping the build trap", "are we building the right things", "roadmap review", "feature factory", "output-driven team", "we keep shipping but nothing changes", or wants to shift focus from shipping features to delivering value - even if they don't explicitly say "outcome vs output".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write OKRs (Objectives and Key Results). Use when the user says "write OKRs", "help me set goals", "create objectives and key results", "quarterly goals", "team OKRs", "I need to define success for this quarter", "Doerr method", or wants to translate a strategic direction into measurable targets - even if they don't explicitly say "OKRs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract UX tasks from a product spec and save as ux-tasks.md in the same spec folder. Use this skill when: - The user wants to generate UX work items from a spec - The user says "UX tasks", "what does UX need to do", "extract UX work", "UX deliverables" - The user wants to hand off a spec to the UX/design team - The user asks "what screens need designing" or "what UX decisions are open"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliver feedback using Kim Scott's Radical Candor framework - care personally while challenging directly. Use when a leader needs to give difficult feedback, says "I need to tell someone something hard", "how do I give feedback without hurting them", "I've been avoiding a conversation", "my direct report isn't performing", "someone on my team has a blind spot", "I keep sugarcoating things", or "how do I be honest without being a jerk". Also trigger when someone describes being too nice (ruinous empathy) or too harsh (obnoxious aggression), or when they describe avoiding a conversation they know they need to have.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document a design system component. Use when the user says "design system docs", "document this for the design system", "add this to the design system", "design token", "component library docs", "style guide", "design system entry", or wants to formally document a pattern, component, or token for team-wide use - even if they don't explicitly say "design system".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a customer health scorecard across usage, engagement, adoption, NPS, support load, and financial risk. Use when user says "health score", "customer health", "build a scorecard", "how healthy is this account", "customer scoring model", "green yellow red", "health dashboard", or "account health framework" - even if they don't say "scorecard" explicitly. Applies to CSMs building account health models or CS leaders standardizing health tracking across the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft professional emails (MoM, status updates, decisions, stakeholder communication) and save as a draft in your email provider. Use this skill after a meeting, decision, spec update, or any event that needs email communication. Trigger phrases: "send MoM email", "draft meeting minutes email", "MoM email for [meeting]", "create MoM draft", "email the meeting notes", "draft MoM", "draft email", "send update email", "draft email for [topic]". Reads context from meetings, specs, tickets, and conversation. Looks up attendee emails from a local team directory, formats as HTML email, and pushes to the email provider as a draft (never sends).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify expansion signals and structure upsell or cross-sell conversations using land-and-expand and Net Revenue Retention principles. Use when user says "upsell", "expansion", "cross-sell", "grow the account", "increase ARR", "find expansion opportunities", "NRR improvement", "upgrade conversation", "add-on", "renewal and expand", or "land and expand" - even if they don't say "expansion discovery" explicitly. Applies to CSMs managing account growth or CS teams building expansion playbooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate tasks to ANY CLI agent (claude, codex, aider, ...) running in a detached tmux session, with a race-safe done-signal protocol and multi-turn iteration. Use when delegating work to a non-Claude CLI agent, when the user says "tmux delegate", "run agent in tmux", "delegate to codex/aider", or when executor work should run in an observable background terminal instead of the Agent tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional finance research toolkit — backtesting (11 engines + benchmark comparison panel), factor analysis, Alpha Zoo (478 pre-built alphas across qlib158/alpha101/gtja191/academic/fundamental), options pricing, 90 finance skills, 30 multi-agent swarm teams, Trade Journal analyzer, and Shadow Account (extract → backtest → render) across 29 market-data sources (tushare, yfinance, okx, binance, akshare, baostock, tencent, mootdx, ccxt, futu, mt5, tickerall, local, eastmoney, sina, stooq, yahoo, pykrx, india_broker, qveris, longbridge, nobitex, wallex, plus optional-key finnhub/alphavantage/tiingo/fmp/gildata).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A skill that creates new Claude skills and automatically shares them on Slack using Rube for seamless team collaboration and skill discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when designing, generating an MVP blueprint for, auditing, troubleshooting, refactoring, or explaining an agentic harness for any domain. Covers provider-neutral agent architecture for OpenAI, Anthropic, and OpenAI-compatible APIs: agent loops, tool design, record provenance, interactive presentation, user-memory lifecycles, environment-adaptive tools, speculative tool execution, late-bound capabilities, permissions, system prompts, planning, goals, always-on agents and durable runtime, adaptive agent teams, context compaction, memory, skills, MCP/external connectors, public-board communications, realtime voice agents, hardware agents and board deployment, self-refining recursive harnesses, programmable context, continual refinement, observability, evals, prompt caching, agent-legible environments, feedback loops, and safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。