3,012 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /claude-setup:build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug pipeline: investigates a bug, diagnoses root cause, writes failing tests, implements fix via TDD, and reviews the result. Orchestrates bug-investigator -> bug-fixer -> code-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA pipeline: explores the running app like a real user using a browser, then produces a QA report and Playwright E2E tests for regression. Orchestrates app-scout → qa-agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactoring pipeline: analyzes a target file or directory for code quality issues, plans safe incremental improvements, optionally writes tests first as a safety net, implements the changes, and reviews the result. Orchestrates refactor-planner → (test-writer) → parallel-task-orchestrator → code-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RED-GREEN-MUTATE-KILL MUTANTS-REFACTOR workflow for writing production code. Use before ANY production code change - new features, bug fixes, or behavior changes. Triggers on starting implementation work of any kind. Covers the cycle itself - failing test first, minimum code to pass, mutation verification, refactor assessment. For how to write good tests, see testing. For the refactoring step in detail, see refactoring. TDD is non-negotiable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive an Upstash Box (a remote sandboxed workspace) from the terminal with the `box` CLI. Use when asked to run commands, edit files, clone repos, run builds or tests, publish a public URL, browse or screenshot a page, open a pull request or issue with a screenshot attached, schedule recurring work, run an AI agent, or do any work inside a box rather than on this machine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about NixOS, Nix language, flakes, nixpkgs, configuration.nix, nixos-rebuild, modules, options, overlays, derivations, mkDerivation, callPackage, home-manager, nix-darwin, devenv, packaging, cross-compilation, binary caches, garbage collection, NixOS containers, networking, firewall, systemd services, filesystems, LUKS, Wayland, X11, kernel, profiles, NixOS testing or VM tests, ISO images, Docker images, Raspberry Pi, Terraform, distributed builds, remote machines, pinning nixpkgs, rollback, generations, Nix Pills, or any topic related to configuring, packaging, deploying, or troubleshooting NixOS and the Nix ecosystem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or reorganize .NET solutions with clean project boundaries, repeatable SDK settings, and a maintainable baseline for libraries, apps, tests, CI, and local development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the open-source free `ArchUnitNET` library for architecture rules in .NET tests. Use when a repo needs richer architecture assertions than lightweight fluent rule libraries usually provide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the open-source free `NetArchTest.Rules` library for architecture rules in .NET unit tests. Use when a repo wants lightweight, fluent architecture assertions for namespaces, dependencies, or layering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up or refine open-source .NET code-quality gates for CI: formatting, `.editorconfig`, SDK analyzers, third-party analyzers, coverage, mutation testing, architecture tests, and security scanning. Use when a .NET repo needs an explicit quality stack in `AGENTS.md`, docs, or pipeline YAML.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when developing in packages/agent-core-v2 (the DI × Scope agent engine) — adding or modifying a domain Service, choosing a LifecycleScope, wiring DI dependencies, splitting a domain across scopes, owning or migrating a config section, gating behavior behind an experimental flag, raising coded errors, working on the permission system, writing DI/Scope tests, porting business logic from agent-core (v1) to v2, triaging a main-branch commit against v2, or exposing a v2 domain over server-v2 while keeping the /api/v1 wire contract compatible with released clients. Self-contained guide organized by development stage (orient → design → implement → test → verify) plus align workflows for v1→v2 migration, main-branch commit triage, and server-v2 wire exposure; each file carries the rules, examples, and red lines for its step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement A/B tests with code and analytics. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ab-test-implementation related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building, testing, or linting the Ruckus iOS app, regenerating the Tuist project, running tests, or adding new Swift files. Covers xcodebuild, tuist, make, swiftlint, and test workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 2b (implementation, Green phase) and Phase 2c (refactor) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to implement minimal code to pass failing tests, then refactor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 2a (test generation, Red phase) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to generate failing tests for all spec requirements. Records red phase evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive testing skill covering unit, integration, and e2e testing with TDD. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or setting up testing infrastructure. Keywords: test, TDD, unit test, integration, e2e, coverage, mock, jest, vitest
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。