5,150 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyzes performance by day of week and hour of day across your campaigns. Identifies when your ads perform best and worst, recommends ad schedule adjustments with estimated savings, and tells you exactly what you'd give up by restricting hours. Platform: Google and Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes your top performing ads, identifies what's working in the hooks, CTAs, messaging angles, and formats, then generates new variants that follow the same winning patterns while introducing enough variation to test meaningfully. Platform: Google and Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a consistent, filterable naming convention across your Google and Meta accounts based on your campaign types, objectives, targeting, and reporting needs. Makes filtering, reporting, and cross-platform analysis actually work instead of guessing what "Campaign_v3_Final_NEW" means. Platform: Google and Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Models what happens to your CPA, ROAS, conversion volume, and impression share when you increase or decrease budget by any amount. Uses your actual account data and historical diminishing returns patterns, not generic industry assumptions. Platform: Google and Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Catches unusual performance changes across your accounts — CPC spikes, CVR drops, spend surges, impression collapses, CTR shifts — and flags them with context about what likely changed. The goal is to catch problems in hours instead of discovering them days later during a routine check. Platform: Google and Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track which of your LinkedIn comments earned author replies. Flags the 6-24h warm-reply window where thread momentum peaks, classifies threads as hot/warm/cool/dormant, and routes warm ones to linkedin-reply-handler for follow-up drafts. Powered by Apify, no LinkedIn login. Triggers on "what threads need follow-up", "author replied", "monitor my comments". Not for analyzing likers on a post (use linkedin-engager-analytics).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate any Obsidian vault as a living, self-rewriting second brain (an evolution of Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern: sources rewrite existing pages, contradictions reconcile automatically, scheduled agents maintain the vault while you sleep). Use this skill whenever the user asks Claude to read, write, update, search, or manage their Obsidian vault - including saving notes from conversation, creating daily entries, updating kanban boards, logging dev work, managing people notes, capturing decisions, tracking deals, or maintaining any vault structure. Also triggers when the user wants to bootstrap a new vault from scratch, run a vault health check, or drop a _CLAUDE.md into their vault so all Claude surfaces share the same operating rules. Also runs Crew (/crew): one shared logbook so Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Grok Bot know what each other did, in any plain folder or the vault. Includes a research toolkit (7 commands: /x-read, /x-pulse, /research, /research-deep, /notebooklm, /youtube, /podcast) for AI-powered research via Grok, Perplexity, NotebookLM, YouTube, and podcast feeds - findings save to the vault automatically following the AI-first vault rule. Use proactively whenever the conversation produces information worth preserving (decisions, people met, projects started, tasks completed, lessons learned, research findings).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage cost basis calculation in TRES Finance: check status, view/change strategy (FIFO, LIFO, AVG, MAX_GAINS, MAX_LOSSES, FIFO_IMPAIRMENT), trigger recalculation, review financial issues, manage reevaluations/impairments, set bulk fiat prices, configure spec-ID lot disposal rules, view per-asset cost basis results, and export cost basis reports. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks about cost basis, gains/losses, realized gains, unrealized gains, COGS, inventory lots, tax lots, cost basis strategy, reevaluation, impairment, fiat value override, spec-ID rules, financial issues (negative balance, missing fiat), or anything related to how their crypto assets are costed. Also trigger when the user says "calculate cost basis", "what is my cost basis strategy", "show me financial issues", "create a reevaluation", "run cost basis", "change strategy to LIFO", or similar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Match TRES ledger transactions to ERP invoices/bills (AP/AR) and optionally sync them to the connected ERP (Xero, QuickBooks Online, NetSuite). Trigger this skill whenever the user wants to match, link, close, reconcile, or sync an invoice or bill against a blockchain transaction — even if they don't say "skill" or use those exact words. Trigger phrases include: "match this invoice to a transaction", "match a bill to tx", "close invoice INV-123", "close bill 9988", "link this tx to a bill", "pay this invoice from this transaction", "set up this tx as AP", "set up this tx as AR", "sync this transaction as AP/AR", "match AP/AR", "find the invoice/bill for this hash", "what bill does this tx pay". Trigger ONLY for explicit AP/AR matching/closing intent — do NOT trigger for general transaction explanations (use tres-tx-story), for ingesting an explorer link into the ledger (use tres-explorer-tx-to-ledger), or for ERP connection setup itself (use tres-settings-management).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Submit feedback about the TRES Claude plugin — bug reports, feature requests, skill improvements, new skill ideas, MCP issues, workflow friction, or positive feedback about what's working well. Use this skill whenever the user wants to share any kind of feedback about the plugin, its skills, or the TRES MCP. Trigger phrases include: "submit feedback", "report a bug", "request a feature", "suggest an improvement", "I have an idea", "something is broken", "the skill isn't working", "I love this skill", "this worked great", "the MCP is returning wrong data", "the flow is confusing", "can you fix the skill", "file a skill request", "give feedback", "this could be better". Also trigger proactively when the conversation appears to be wrapping up — e.g. the user says "thanks", "that's all", "looks good", "we're done", "nothing else", or any other signal that the task is complete. In that case, offer a brief feedback prompt instead of launching the full guided flow. Do NOT trigger for general questions about how a skill works — only when the user wants to submit feedback or the conversation is ending.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze any TRES Finance report XLSX and produce an automatic findings summary. Trigger this skill whenever a user uploads a .xlsx file that came from TRES Finance and asks to "analyze", "summarize", "review", "check", "audit", "look at", "what does this show", "any issues", "anything interesting", or "walk me through" the report. Also trigger when the user uploads an Excel file and mentions TRES, reconciliation, balances, transactions, cost basis, roll forward, or ERP sync. The skill identifies the report type from the file structure, runs targeted analysis based on report-specific logic, and produces a clear findings summary highlighting anomalies, key metrics, and action items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze an organization's sub-transaction patterns in TRES Finance, identify groups of repetitive transactions, and propose data-driven rollup rules that consolidate them into one aggregated entry per interval (daily or monthly) for cleaner ERP integration. Also lists and deletes rollup rules. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks about rollup rules, transaction aggregation, consolidating transactions, reducing transaction noise, rolling up gas fees, rolling up staking rewards, rolling up micro-transactions, or collapsing many small ledger entries into fewer summary entries. Also trigger on "create a rollup rule", "suggest rollup rules", "what should I roll up", "show my rollup rules", "delete a rollup rule", "aggregate transactions", "too many transactions", "reduce transaction count", "roll up fees", "daily rollup", "monthly rollup". If a wallet has too many transactions, high-frequency activity, or noisy ledger entries, proactively suggest rollup rules. For computing the EXACT impact of a single already-specified rule or reviewing submitted/pending rules, use the tres-rollup-review skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compute the EXACT sub-transaction impact of a rollup rule in TRES Finance — every filter applied — and flag genuine problems (zero matches, overlap, config mistakes) before the rule is created. Two modes. Mode A: a pre-create quality gate invoked by the tres-rollup-rules skill to vet proposed candidate rules. Mode B: standalone review of a rule someone submitted or of existing PENDING rules. Trigger this skill when the user says "review this rollup rule", "what would this rollup rule actually match", "preview the rollup impact", "how many transactions would this rule catch", "is this rollup rule valid", "validate my rollup rule", "check my pending rollup rules", or "review the rollup requests". Do NOT use this to design or propose new rollups — that is tres-rollup-rules. This skill only measures impact and flags issues; it never executes mutations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an implementation plan as one interactive HTML page - a tree of claims (why › what › how › where), each proved by one exhibit (UI mockup, state machine, call stack, schema or code), with the decisions the user has to make placed on the claim they change. Use when the user types /html-plan, or asks for a plan, RFC or design before building something that touches more than a couple of files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show current session status and context health for the sewage project. Use to check context usage, active work state, and what will survive compaction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants substantive academic feedback on a paper — not just surface edits. Triggers include: "review my paper", "give me feedback on this draft", "what would a referee say", "anticipate referee objections", "act as a referee", "check my identification strategy", "is my argument convincing", "review this manuscript", "critique my paper", "will this pass review", or any request for deep critique of academic writing beyond typos and grammar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill covers applied microeconomic empirical methods and research design. Use when the user is selecting an identification strategy, comparing estimators, running diagnostics, designing a research study, or evaluating an empirical strategy. Triggers on "which method", "what estimator", "how to choose", "method comparison", "empirical strategy", "research design", "applied micro", "identification strategy", "power analysis", "design-based", "model-based", "minimum detectable effect", "specification".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文（用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-grade Bayesian causal inference with PyMC, CausalPy, and DoWhy. Enforces DAG-first thinking, mandatory user checkpoints for assumptions, design-specific refutation, and defensible reporting with causal language guardrails. Trigger on: causal inference, causal effect estimation, treatment effects, counterfactuals, difference-in-differences (DiD), synthetic control, regression discontinuity (RDD), interrupted time series (ITS), instrumental variables (IV), propensity scores, DAGs, causal graphs, confounders, backdoor criterion, do-calculus, interventional distributions, pm.do(), pm.observe(), CausalPy, DoWhy, mediation analysis, refutation, sensitivity analysis, parallel trends, placebo tests, or any question of the form "does X cause Y" or "what is the effect of X on Y."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep analysis of Git history: identify frequently changed hotspot files, analyze code ownership by contributor, and scan for leaked secrets. Triggered when users ask about Git analysis, code hotspots, who owns what code, secret scanning, security audits of commit history, or optimizing code review assignments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read when the user asks what OpenKnowledge is, wants to install it on a repository, wants to open or preview a single markdown file that is not part of an OpenKnowledge project, wants to share an OpenKnowledge project with collaborators, asks whether OpenKnowledge supports a particular capability, or asks how `ok init` / `ok cowork` / OK Desktop set up a project. Do NOT load to perform OpenKnowledge reads/writes — the runtime guidance for editing markdown inside an initialized OK project ships as a separate project-local skill installed into each detected agent's skills dir (for example `.claude/skills/open-knowledge/`) whenever `ok init` runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to work in a Personal CRM project (the `entity-vault` starter pack, GBrain-compatible): a typed-entity vault of people, companies, meetings, and concepts, each a dossier with a rewritable summary plus an append-only timeline. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to capture notes about a person or company, log a meeting, prep for an upcoming meeting, or answer who someone is and what was last said. Carries the dossier convention and entity-extraction behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve recent local Clips Rewind context when the user says "Look at Rewind," asks what just happened, or refers to something they recently said or saw.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。