「tests」の検索結果

Strict test-driven development for behavior changes. Requires verified RED before production code, minimal GREEN, and refactor only after passing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build throwaway code to validate an uncertain approach before committing to a plan. Two branches — Logic (terminal state machine) or UI (multiple designs on one route with URL-param switcher). No persistence, no tests, single-command start. Use between analyze and plan when the approach itself is uncertain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan-aware auto-fix loop after coding. Runs tests, lint, format, and graph checks. Updates plan task status. Use after execute/tdd.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 6-phase debugging. Build feedback loop first, reproduce deterministically, hypothesize with ranked falsifiable theories, instrument one variable at a time, fix with regression test, cleanup. Use when a bug exists, tests fail unexpectedly, or behavior is wrong and cause is unknown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-lifecycle Web E2E Testing, QA/QC analysis, and Playwright test automation. Generates business test matrices (happy path, negative, boundary, RBAC, API/network failure simulation), implements resilient Page Object Model tests, and produces structured QA bug reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold the test framework and CI/CD pipeline for the project's engine. Creates the tests/ directory structure, engine-specific test runner configuration, and GitHub Actions workflow. Run once during Technical Setup phase before the first sprint begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-commit code quality review for Unity C# code. Checks against Rules, CODING_STANDARDS.md, NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md, and GDD Gherkin test coverage. Use when code has been written and tests are passing but before committing. Runs automatically at Step 8.5 of /uw-cmd-implement-feature. Triggers on "review this code", "check my implementation", "pre-commit review", "code review", "check before commit", "is this ready to commit", "review my changes", or any request to validate code quality before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect non-deterministic (flaky) tests by reading CI run logs or test result history. Aggregates pass rates per test, identifies intermittent failures, recommends quarantine or fix, and maintains a flaky test registry. Best run during Polish phase or after multiple CI runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate engine-specific test helper libraries for the project's test suite. Reads existing test patterns and produces tests/helpers/ with assertion utilities, factory functions, and mock objects tailored to the project's systems. Reduces boilerplate in new test files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve a skill using a test-fix-retest loop. Runs static checks, proposes targeted fixes, rewrites the skill, re-tests, and keeps or reverts based on score change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a QA test plan for a sprint or feature. Reads GDDs and story files, classifies stories by test type (Logic/Integration/Visual/UI), and produces a structured test plan covering automated tests required, manual test cases, smoke test scope, and playtest sign-off requirements. Run before sprint begins or when starting a major feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unity Test Framework patterns for EditMode and PlayMode tests including async testing, mocking, and test organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or reviewing Vue 3 + TypeScript project structure, SFC/component boundaries, composables organization, route composition, Pinia ownership, API/error/styling defaults, directives, or repository-wide Vue conventions. Prefer narrower skills for forms, data fetching, tests, accessibility, virtualization, animation, or security deep dives; Chinese triggers include Vue 3 project specification, Vue component architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running existing project validation commands and fixing failures after code changes, including lint, type-check, unit/integration test, build, CI, or local script failures. Do not use when the task is to design or author new component/E2E tests; Chinese triggers include validation, check failures, fix failures, CI failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring or reviewing frontend unit, component, or light integration tests close to UI code, including React Testing Library, Vue Test Utils, hooks/composables, props/emits, callbacks, accessible queries, user-event interactions, mocks, loading/error/empty states, and regression coverage. For layer planning, real-browser journeys, or existing validation failures, choose the matching testing or validation workflow first; Chinese triggers include component testing, Component unit testing, unit testing, lightweight integration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or reviewing React + TypeScript project structure, feature/module boundaries, component architecture, hooks organization, routing composition, state/API/error/styling defaults, or repository-wide React conventions. Prefer narrower skills for forms, data fetching, tests, accessibility, virtualization, animation, or security deep dives; Chinese triggers include React project specification, React component architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when synchronizing frontend project documentation with source-of-truth files such as package.json, lockfiles, config, env examples, routes, API clients or server routes, schemas, components, tests, CI, build/deploy config, ADRs, changelogs, or migration notes. Do not use for general prose polishing only; Chinese triggers include document synchronization, update README, docs sync, environment variable documentation, command list, API Document synchronization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a complete Grain domain service with schemas, read models, commands, queries, and tests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use OpenClaw Manager (OCM) safely and correctly for OpenClaw environment lifecycle work, runtime installation/builds, release-shaped local builds, upgrades, migration/adoption, cloning existing user state, service supervision, gateway logs, dev worktrees, plugin testing, model/provider smoke tests, TUI/dashboard checks, cleanup, and concise reporting. Use whenever Codex is asked to use OCM, manage OpenClaw envs/runtimes/services, test OpenClaw with OCM, reproduce existing-user or new-user flows, or avoid breaking user state while working with OpenClaw.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a computer programmer implementing to a given specification — translating a design/pseudocode/systems-analyst spec into working code in a specified language, flagging spec ambiguity before writing code, maintaining or modernizing an existing codebase against its original contract, or writing unit tests that prove the implementation matches the spec (not designing the system the spec describes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologist/Technician — verifying an installed fastener's preload against a drawing's torque callout via the T=K·D·F relationship, reducing strain-gauge data from a structural proof-load test into stress and checking it against an FEA-predicted margin, selecting and executing an NDI method against a defect type and material, reducing a wind-tunnel test point's dynamic-pressure and Reynolds-number data, or ballooning and dispositioning an AS9102 first article inspection. Distinct from an aerospace-engineer (owns the design, structural analysis, and certification basis) — this role builds, instruments, tests, and inspects the hardware the engineer specified, closing the loop with measurement rather than deriving a new analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, and optionally test Bash and Zsh shell scripts following project coding standards. Use for ANY shell scripting task: (1) creating a new Bash or Zsh script, (2) editing, fixing, or reviewing an existing .sh, .bash, or .zsh file, (3) adding error handling, dependency checks, or cleanup traps to shell scripts, (4) implementing API integration or file processing in shell, (5) writing or fixing ShellSpec tests (spec/*_spec.sh), or (6) deciding whether a script should be written in Bash or Zsh. Defaults to Bash; Zsh-specific guidance lives in a reference file that is loaded only when writing Zsh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a failing GitHub Actions run to green in as few CI runs as possible, with a bounded fix-critique-commit-push-recheck loop that batches every evidenced fix into each push. Use when the user supplies a GitHub Actions run URL or run ID and wants the failure fixed, or asks to "make CI green", "fix the failing workflow/build/tests", "fix the red build", or to keep iterating on a branch or pull request until its checks pass. Pulls run results and failed-job logs through the gh CLI, and sends every fix plan to the rubber-duck reviewer before any code is touched.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this whenever the user asks to "create a module", "scaffold a feature", "add a Vue domain", "new module called X", or starts work on a brand-new vertical (views + components + store + router entry + tests). Duplicates the canonical `src/modules/tasks` template, applies kebab/Pascal/camel/ UPPER renames, and wires config-driven values. Module stays self-contained.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。