3,869 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect authentication with secure flows. Use for third-party integrations, SSO systems, token-based API access, or encountering authorization code flow, PKCE, token refresh, scope management errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements API rate limiting using token bucket, sliding window, and Redis-based algorithms to protect against abuse. Use when securing public APIs, implementing tiered access, or preventing denial-of-service attacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for "ретро", "обзор недели", or "что было за неделю" and the department needs a fact-based closeout plus its next Area goal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teach any topic deeply from first principles and build evidence-based paths toward exceptional capability. Use when a user asks to understand, explain, learn, or deep-dive into a topic; asks why or how something works, why it matters, how alternatives compare, or what different perspectives reveal; requests current paradigms, a complete roadmap or curriculum, deliberate practice and feedback, or a top-1%-level mastery plan. Answer explanation questions completely before offering a curriculum; route explicit mastery goals to an adaptive practice and proof-of-capability system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score and prioritize leads based on firmographic fit and behavioral engagement signals, producing ranked tiers for sales team focus. Use when the user requests lead scoring or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically organizes files in a directory into a clean structure based on configurable rules — by file type, date, project, or priority — with support for duplicate detection, naming conventions, and archival strategies. Use when the user requests file organization or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create text-based wireframes at low, mid, and high fidelity with component inventories, interaction annotations, and responsive breakpoint specifications. Use when the user requests wireframing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization needs to triage an AI use case, vendor, model, product, or portfolio for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; prepare an AI inventory, gap register, implementation roadmap, or counsel briefing; assess provider, deployer, importer, distributor, product-manufacturer, authorised-representative, or GPAI-provider responsibilities; or re-check readiness after regulatory or product changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write clear, searchable help center articles and FAQ entries based on support data, product documentation, and common customer questions. Use when the user requests knowledge base article writing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mathematical Modeler. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Modeler judgment. Reasons from nondimensionalization, conservation/positivity laws, and minimal-viable model structure through mechanistic ODE/PDE, stochastic, and agent-based formulations, profile-likelihood and Fisher-information identifiability, and Sobol/Morris sensitivity analysis, while treating sloppy unidentifiable parameters, structural model uncertainty, and out-of-regime extrapolation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Medical Parasitologist. Use when a task calls for Medical Parasitologist judgment. Reasons from specimen-stage fit, exposure-based pretest probability, and antigen-versus-antibody kinetics through thick/thin Giemsa films, formalin-ethyl-acetate concentration with trichrome, multiplex PCR, and EITB serology against CDC DPDx and WHO algorithms, while treating pfhrp2/3-deleted RDT false-negatives, single-O&P misses of Strongyloides, and colonization-mistaken-for-infection as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Health Economist. Use when a task calls for Health Economist judgment. Reasons from QALY/ICER and NMB opportunity-cost framing, NICE reference case and WTP bands, cohort Markov/PSM models with PSA (CEAC/CEAF), ISPOR transferability and DCE conjoint checklists, CHEERS 2022 and trial-based RCT-CEA reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Information Retrieval Scientist. Use when a task calls for Information Retrieval Scientist judgment. Reasons from the Probability Ranking Principle, Saracevic's relevance layers, and Cranfield pooling through tuned BM25, SPLADE/ColBERT/dense and LLM reranking, trec_eval/ir_measures with paired topic-level tests, interleaving, and nugget-based RAG evaluation while treating unjudged-as-nonrelevant pools, position-biased clicks, LLM-judge circularity, single-vector embedding limits, and benchmark contamination as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Forestry Scientist. Use when a task calls for Forestry Scientist judgment. Reasons from silvicultural systems, site index, DGH and DBH increment, and FIA cruise design through FVS/ORGANON calibration, LiDAR area-based inventory with support matching, and IPCC carbon pools while treating site-index misassignment, plot edge effects, and change-of-spatial-support bias as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Formal Methods Researcher. Use when a task calls for Formal Methods Researcher judgment. Reasons from operational semantics and temporal logics through SPIN/TLA+/PRISM, Coq/Lean/Isabelle, Z3/CVC5, refinement and separation logic, vacuity and false-positive diagnosis, and Dafny/F* versus property-based testing boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Developmental Biologist. Use when a task calls for Developmental Biologist judgment. Reasons from stage, positional information, gene regulatory networks, and tissue mechanics through morphology-based staging (Carnegie/HH/Theiler/NF/hpf), French-flag morphogen logic, light-sheet 4D imaging, lineage tracing, and ARRIVE/MDAR/REMBI reporting while treating developmental delay, CRISPR F0 mosaicism, morpholino p53 toxicity, and conflated fate-versus-lineage claims as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Computer Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computer Scientist judgment. Reasons from computational models, abstraction contracts, invariants, and measurable complexity through CLRS-grade algorithm analysis, impossibility results (FLP, CAP, NP-hardness), property-based and chaos testing, and formal tools (TLA+, Coq, Z3) while treating partial failure, race conditions, label leakage, and abstraction leaks like GC pauses and clock skew as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Causal Inference Scientist. Use when a task calls for Causal Inference Scientist judgment. Reasons from structural causal models, potential outcomes, and identification logic through DAGs and do-calculus, doubly-robust estimators (AIPW/TMLE, IPTW, g-formula), and design-based methods (IV, RD, Callaway-Sant'Anna DiD, synthetic control) while treating colliders and M-bias, positivity/overlap failure, and unmeasured confounding (Rosenbaum bounds, E-values) as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Chemical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Chemical Engineer judgment. Reasons from closing mass, energy, and momentum balances and competing equilibrium/kinetics/transport regimes through Aspen Plus/HYSYS flowsheeting, McCabe-Thiele and Damkohler-based sizing, pinch analysis, and HAZOP/LOPA with API 520/521 relief, while treating azeotrope-pinched columns, reactor runaway, recycle impurity accumulation, and pump cavitation (NPSHa<NPSHr) as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Automotive Engineer. Use when a task calls for Automotive Engineer judgment. Reasons from vehicle-level requirements, regulatory limits, energy/exergy budgets, and distribution-based durability through DFMEA/DVP&R, DoE calibration (INCA, CANape, HIL), Pacejka tire and multibody models, rainflow fatigue, and source-path NVH analysis while treating undocumented build-level and cal-ID deltas, unmet emissions preconditioning and OBD readiness, ADAS sensor misalignment, and cross-domain torque-arbitration conflicts as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Agricultural Engineer. Use when a task calls for Agricultural Engineer judgment. Reasons from mass, energy, and momentum balances on variable biological media through ET-based scheduling, psychrometric grain-drying balances, ASABE D497 draft estimates, EPANET pipe networks, and RTK-GNSS/ISOBUS precision-ag validation while treating soil compaction, clogged drip emitters, grain-bin hotspots, GPS drift, and uncalibrated yield monitors as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Atomic, Molecular & Optical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Atomic, Molecular & Optical Physicist judgment. Reasons from Rabi/OBE dynamics, laser-cooling hierarchy, optical lattices and Hubbard U/J, and magic-wavelength clock budgets through NIST ASD, ARC, QuTiP/PyLCP, and in-situ lattice-depth calibration while treating power-based depth guesses, polarization impurities, BBR shifts, and imaging-heating conflation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kerberos-based Active Directory attacks driven by hand with standard tooling (Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, and delegation abuse: unconstrained, constrained/S4U, RBCD). Use when the target has SPN-bearing service accounts, accounts without pre-authentication, or delegation configured on computer/user objects, and you want the exact impacket/Rubeus/bloodyAD command, the hash format and hashcat mode, the Windows Event IDs that fire, and the remediation to write up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。