2,201 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit and improve articles by restructuring sections, improving clarity, and tightening prose. Use when user wants to edit, revise, or improve an article draft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures the rollout shape of a PostHog experiment — the variant split (50/50, 80/20, A/B/C ratios), the overall rollout percentage that gates how many users enter the experiment, and the disambiguation when a percentage like "roll out to 25%" could mean either. Use when the user mentions a rollout percentage, variant split, or traffic distribution; gives a ratio like 60/40, 70/30, or 80/20; asks "who sees the test variant?"; wants to increase, decrease, or change the rollout or split on a draft or running experiment; weighs equal vs uneven splits; or proposes a mid-experiment split change (often an anti-pattern that needs reset or end-and-restart).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring. Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and shipping with a notification destination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs adaptive clinical trials including group-sequential (O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, Lan-DeMets spending), sample-size re-estimation (blinded Friede-Kieser, unblinded Cui-Hung-Wang, Mehta-Pocock promising zone), seamless Phase 2/3 with treatment-arm selection, population enrichment, and response-adaptive randomisation. Covers FDA 2019 Final Adaptive Designs Guidance, FDA 2022 Master Protocols, and ICH E20 Step 2b/3 draft (June 2025, NOT final). Use when planning interim analyses, sample-size re-estimation, or master/platform-trial designs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs Bayesian clinical trials including Phase I dose-finding (BOIN, CRM, EWOC, mTPI-2), meta-analytic-predictive (MAP) priors with robust mixtures for external data borrowing, EXNEX for basket trials, hierarchical models for safety AE (Berry-Berry), Bayesian platform trials (I-SPY 2, GBM AGILE, REMAP-CAP), and posterior probability stopping rules. Covers FDA Bayesian Devices Guidance (2010), FDA Bayesian Methodology in Drugs Draft (January 2026), BOIN Fit-for-Purpose qualification (December 2021), and Project Optimus dose-optimisation. Use when designing dose-finding studies, platform trials, or sensitivity analyses with informative priors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze the competitive landscape for an SCF submission. Identifies similar projects on Stellar and other chains, assesses overlap and differentiation. Use when reviewing or drafting an SCF submission and you need to map similar projects on Stellar and other chains and articulate the differentiation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate the SCF team's manual prescreen on a Build Award submission — a completeness and eligibility check applied to every full submission before panel review. Checks completeness, Stellar integration, eligibility, budget issues, and common disqualifiers. Use when reviewing a draft Build Award submission for readiness before it goes to the SCF round.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design AI email assistants with drafting and triage. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-email-assistant related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert legal advisor specializing in technology law, compliance, and risk mitigation. Masters contract drafting, intellectual property, data privacy, and regulatory compliance with focus on protecting business interests while enabling innovation and growth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add Gmail as an MCP tool (read, search, send, label, draft) using OneCLI-managed OAuth. The agent gets Gmail tools in every enabled group; OneCLI injects real tokens at request time so no raw credentials are ever in the container or on disk in usable form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare the internal case for hosting an Otameshi Tenshoku trial: total what it costs the company with candidate pay, staff hours and platform or incidental fees kept apart, compare it with the budget, state what remains if no hire follows, and lay out the risks, stop conditions, decision owners and deadlines. Use when a hiring manager needs approval or budget from a decision maker, a recruiter has to explain the plan to the team that will host, or a small-business owner wants to see the full cost including their own time before posting; do not use to design the work (trial-work-design), to write the listing (trial-listing-draft), to predict whether a hire will follow, to state platform fees, agency fees or market rates from memory, or to submit the request or post the listing on the user's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help job seekers use Otameshi Tenshoku to prepare profiles and applications, clarify trial conditions, plan learning visits or paid trial work, and reflect on the experience. Use when a candidate wants to apply for, prepare for, negotiate the scope of, or review an otameshi work experience; do not use to predict whether they will be hired or to judge their aptitude, to state fees, contract terms, or service conditions from memory, or to submit an application, update a profile, or send a message on their behalf. Employer-side requests belong to the employer skills (trial-work-design, trial-listing-draft, applicant-reply and others).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check the terms of a specific side-work assignment offered as gyomu-itaku or freelance work in Japan, item by item: what the client has actually put in writing about the deliverable, the fee, the payment due date, what counts as out of scope, how many revisions are included, who bears expenses, who owns the result, confidentiality, and how either side can end it. Convert the fee into an effective hourly figure over the hours the work will really take including meetings, revisions and unpaid preparation, and count the days from delivery to the payment due date. Use when someone is offered or is discussing a paid side job, a freelance assignment, spot consulting, or paid trial work and wants to know what is still unwritten before starting; do not use to judge whether the fee is fair or the terms lawful, to decide whether to accept, to draft or sign the contract for the user, or to check whether their employer's rules permit side work, which is sidework-rules-check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a request to change the terms of a Japanese job offer before accepting it, sorting what the user wants changed (pay components, start date, work style, location, title, probation) by priority, tying each ask to a basis the user can show (the written offer, the job posting, what was said in interviews, their own records), working the timing back from the acceptance deadline, and drafting the message to the employer or recruiting agent. Use when a user has an offer and wants to ask for higher pay, a later start date, more remote days, or other changed terms, or wants to know how to raise it without losing the offer; do not use to predict whether the request will succeed, to set a target figure from market rates, to fabricate a competing offer, to decide whether to accept, or to send anything to the employer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design what an employer will have a candidate do during an Otameshi Tenshoku trial: turn a business problem into a bounded paid assignment or an unpaid learning visit, with scope, completion criteria, candidate hours, company staff hours, duration, compensation and change conditions, and check the planned cost against the budget. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner wants to decide what work to offer, how much time it takes, what it costs, or how to adjust a plan when materials are late or the scope grows; do not use to write the public listing (trial-listing-draft), to reply to applicants (applicant-reply), to state market rates, legal, tax or service conditions from memory, or to post, contact or contract on the user's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debrief a finished Otameshi Tenshoku trial from the employer's side: set the observed facts against the completion criteria agreed before the start, keep expectations added afterwards, second-hand or off-the-job observations and the company's own late or missing support apart, settle the hours actually worked separately from any evaluation, and draft feedback to the candidate that states facts, support gaps and what happens next without promising a hire or continuation the company has not decided. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner wants to review a trial, decide what to tell the candidate, or work out the settlement after a shortfall; do not use to judge the candidate's aptitude or predict a hire, to cut pay or demand unpaid rework because of dissatisfaction, to compare candidates, or to send the feedback, pay, or update records on the user's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey related literature for a research topic or paper draft. Finds relevant papers, identifies citation gaps, and suggests key references. Use for "find related work", "survey papers on X", "what papers should I cite". 旧名 survey-literature。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use OpenAI Codex CLI as a peer collaboration partner — same standing as Claude, not a one-shot tool. Bring Codex in EARLY (ideation, framing decisions, stuck moments), not only for late peer-review. Hand it strategic context (target, research, draft, reasoning), iterate conversationally over ~3-8 turns, converge before surfacing to the human. Invoke when the user says "check / iterate / ideate with Codex" or "ask Codex" — and proactively when stuck between two reasonable framings, pressure-testing a load-bearing claim or structure, or about to ask the human to pick between options two agents could resolve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides whether and how to polish a draft genome assembly to raise consensus accuracy (QV) with read-type-matched tools - Racon and medaka (ONT consensus), dorado polish, Polypolish and pypolca (Illumina, repeat-aware), Pilon (legacy short-read), NextPolish/NextPolish2, Hapo-G (haplotype-aware), ntEdit, and DeepPolisher/PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant for human. Covers the do-not-polish-HiFi rule, the medaka basecaller-model footgun, held-out Merqury QV as the only honest stop signal, and the haplotype-collapse trap. Use when correcting homopolymer indels or residual SNPs in a long-read assembly, deciding if a HiFi assembly needs polishing, or choosing an ONT vs hybrid vs short-read polishing chain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs Bayesian clinical trials including Phase I dose-finding (BOIN, CRM, EWOC, mTPI-2), meta-analytic-predictive (MAP) priors with robust mixtures for external data borrowing, EXNEX for basket trials, hierarchical models for safety AE (Berry-Berry), Bayesian platform trials (I-SPY 2, GBM AGILE, REMAP-CAP), and posterior probability stopping rules. Covers FDA Bayesian Devices Guidance (2010), FDA Bayesian Methodology in Drugs Draft (January 2026), BOIN Fit-for-Purpose qualification (December 2021), and Project Optimus dose-optimisation. Use when designing dose-finding studies, platform trials, or sensitivity analyses with informative priors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs adaptive clinical trials including group-sequential (O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, Lan-DeMets spending), sample-size re-estimation (blinded Friede-Kieser, unblinded Cui-Hung-Wang, Mehta-Pocock promising zone), seamless Phase 2/3 with treatment-arm selection, population enrichment, and response-adaptive randomisation. Covers FDA 2019 Final Adaptive Designs Guidance, FDA 2022 Master Protocols, and ICH E20 Step 2b/3 draft (June 2025, NOT final). Use when planning interim analyses, sample-size re-estimation, or master/platform-trial designs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill enforces Sentry's blog writing standards across every post — whether you're helping an engineer write their first blog post or a marketer draft a product announcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。