本文へ移動
cccskills

「agm」の検索結果

309 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Use when implementing pool/slab/arena allocators, tuning jemalloc/mimalloc/tcmalloc, writing a Rust GlobalAlloc, or benchmarking allocator performance and fragmentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

Use when a C++ project adopts C++20 modules: named modules, partitions, header units, the global module fragment, CMake CXX_MODULES, or a BMI lookup error. Not for flag basics: use clang.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

Fix scattered/torn regions in hex-grid simulated annealing layouts that use "competitive flood-fill" (one tile per region per outer iteration). Use when: (1) regions of >20 tiles end up dispersed instead of forming compact blobs, (2) maxDist/sqrt(N) dispersion ratio is 10×+ worse than the ideal compact blob, (3) tiles assigned to one region show up in multiple disconnected fragments across the layout, (4) the visualization has a "trypophobia ring" pattern at the perimeter where some regions spill into a perimeter spiral, (5) an overflow spiral fallback exists in the layout code and frequently kicks in for large regions, (6) bigger regions look worse than smaller ones (small regions stay compact, big ones shred). Root cause: interleaved competitive flood-fill (round-robin one tile at a time across all regions) lets large regions get boxed in by neighbors before they finish growing — the unfilled remainder is dumped into the overflow spiral at the perimeter, far from the seed. Fix: replace with sequential region-by-region BFS — process regions in size-descending order, fully claim each region's N contiguous tiles before moving to the next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disentinel/grafema362026年8月24日 更新

Fix silent failures when parsing Grafema semantic IDs that are in URI format instead of legacy arrow format. Use when: (1) code splits semantic IDs by "->" but gets the whole string back because IDs are grafema:// URIs, (2) file path extraction from semantic IDs returns empty or wrong values, (3) derived edges (DEPENDS_ON, etc.) produce 0 results despite source edges existing, (4) any code that processes semantic IDs after the analysis pipeline's to_uri_format() has run. The grafema:// URI format uses # fragments with percent-encoded characters instead of -> separators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disentinel/grafema362026年8月24日 更新

Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp272026年9月13日 更新

Memory is the cornerstone of intelligent agents. Without it, every interaction starts from zero. This skill covers the architecture of agent memory: short-term (context window), long-term (vector stores), and the cognitive architectures that organize them. Key insight: Memory isn't just storage - it's retrieval. A million stored facts mean nothing if you can't find the right one. Chunking, embedding, and retrieval strategies determine whether your agent remembers or forgets. The field is fragm

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data262026年10月13日 更新

Ultra-fast proof-of-concept and MVP specialist. Use this agent when you need to validate an idea quickly working prototype before the meeting's over. Pragmatic, speed-focused, validation-oriented. Ships in days, not weeks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework262026年10月11日 更新

"Design and conduct mixed methods research using convergent, explanatory sequential, or exploratory sequential strategies with genuine integration of qualitative and quantitative strands. Use this skill when the user needs to choose a mixed methods design, integrate qualitative and quantitative data at design, methods, or interpretation levels, justify mixing on pragmatist grounds, or when they ask 'which mixed methods design should I use', 'how do I integrate qual and quant findings', or 'is running both qual and quant enough to be mixed methods'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill262026年7月20日 更新

ssrf

無料

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when user-controlled input is used to construct URLs that the server fetches, enabling access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and local files via `file://` scheme. Detect via parameters accepting URLs or hostnames, PDF/report generators rendering `<iframe>/<img>/<script>`, and blind SSRF via out-of-band DNS callbacks. Bypass filters using IP decimal/octal/hex encoding, URL-userinfo tricks, and URL fragments. Tools: Burp Collaborator, curl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Deep OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect security assessment. Covers the full attack surface: redirect_uri validation bypass (path traversal, open redirect chains, subdomain confusion, URL parsing tricks, parameter pollution, response mode switching), missing/broken state parameter CSRF, PKCE downgrade and absent-challenge attacks, implicit grant token leakage (Referer, browser history, XSS fragment theft), authorization code injection, scope escalation, client confusion attacks, mutable-claims account takeover (iss+sub confusion, email-keyed identity merging), pre-account takeover via unverified registration, OpenID Connect dynamic client registration SSRF (logo_uri, jwks_uri, sector_identifier_uri, request_uri), nonce replay, ID token validation failures, Device Code phishing flow, mobile custom URI scheme hijacking, refresh token persistence, token introspection enumeration, consent screen clickjacking, host header injection, and cross-IdP mix-up attacks. Uses KOAuth, jwt_tool, nuclei oauth templates, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual request payloads and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /api-security when OAuth endpoints are discovered. Chains into /web-exploit for open redirect, XSS, and SSRF chaining. Chains into /post-exploit when full account takeover is achieved. Chains into /credential-audit when access tokens or refresh tokens are recovered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Apollo Client GraphQL patterns — normalized cache and type policies, queries, mutations with optimistic updates, pagination, fragments, subscriptions, and Suspense hooks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agents-inc/skills242026年9月8日 更新

Three.js shaders - GLSL, ShaderMaterial, uniforms, custom effects. Use when creating custom visual effects, modifying vertices, writing fragment shaders, or extending built-in materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

datit309/supergraph222026年10月13日 更新

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Embedded/Firmware Engineer — analyzing worst-case execution time for a hard real-time deadline, choosing static over dynamic memory allocation to avoid fragmentation on a long-uptime device, keeping an interrupt service routine minimal and deferring work to the main loop, synchronizing a variable shared between an ISR and main context to prevent a torn read, or verifying a hardware register interaction against the datasheet's exact timing rather than observed bench behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wonsukchoi/domain-experts212026年10月12日 更新

Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand ENCODE audit warnings, needs to compare quality across experiments, or is deciding whether data is usable for their analysis. Also use when the user mentions QC, quality control, or data filtering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ammawla/encode-toolkit212026年9月27日 更新

Execute ENCODE ATAC-seq processing pipeline from FASTQ to peaks and signal tracks. Child of pipeline-guide. Provides stage-by-stage Nextflow execution with Docker containers and cloud deployment. Handles Tn5 transposase offset correction, mitochondrial read removal, and nucleosome-free fragment selection. Use when users need to process ATAC-seq data following ENCODE standards. Trigger on: ATAC-seq pipeline, run ATAC-seq, process ATAC-seq, chromatin accessibility, open chromatin, Tn5 shift, TSS enrichment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ammawla/encode-toolkit212026年9月27日 更新

Multi-agent code review using the Pragmatic Quality framework. Orchestrates parallel review agents (CLAUDE.md compliance, bug scanning, git history, security) with independent confidence scoring to produce high-signal findings. Use when user runs /code-review, /review:code-review, requests a "code review", "review my changes", "PR review", or mentions "review diff", "review branch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins212026年8月14日 更新

任意输入的路由分类器。在输入意图不明确时,判断应走「认知更新路径A(cognitive-capture-fragment)」还是「任务执行路径B(对应任务Skill)」,输出明确路由结论 + 判断理由,不自动触发下游。触发词:「帮我判断这是认知更新还是任务执行」「这个输入是什么类型」「先分类再执行」「路由分类一下」。不应触发:关于计算机网络路由算法的技术问题。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills212026年4月1日 更新

捕捉碎片化思考,结构化写入认知结构L2层。触发词:「碎片」「记录一下」「想法」「新洞见」「我发现」「我觉得」「随手记」「想记一个」。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills212026年4月1日 更新

将待整合的L2碎片通过小人机制整合进L1系统性文档,保持知识体系自洽。触发词:「整合碎片」「哪些碎片没整合」「更新文档」「把碎片整合进去」「处理积压」「消化碎片」。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills212026年4月1日 更新

Design focus modes that actually protect attention: Do Not Disturb schedules, app filtering, notification tiers, and context-specific setups. Use when interruptions fragment your day or 'do not disturb' never stays on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aicodedecode/awesome-muse-skills202026年10月10日 更新

Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

umairinayat/Specter-AI182026年9月29日 更新

Enforces KISS/DRY/YAGNI during authoring and ad-hoc quality reviews. Pragmatic standards: concise, direct, no unnecessary comments. NOT for post-hoc diff/PR review (see mk:review); NOT for behavior-preserving simplification passes (see mk:simplify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

testing

無料

Pragmatic testing guidance focused on confidence, behavior over implementation details, and integration-first coverage. Use when designing a test strategy, writing or reviewing tests, reducing brittle mocks, or deciding what is worth testing in an application or library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

susomejias/rembric142026年10月13日 更新

Cross-cultural communication frameworks for understanding discourse patterns across cultures

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新