「behavioral」の検索結果

Recommends appropriate software design patterns based on problem descriptions, requirements, or code scenarios. Use when designing software architecture, refactoring code, solving common design problems, or choosing between design approaches. Analyzes the problem context and suggests suitable creational, structural, behavioral, architectural, or concurrency patterns with implementation guidance and trade-off analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes surviving mutants from mutation testing to identify why tests failed to detect them. Takes repository code, test suite, and mutation testing results as input. Identifies root causes including insufficient coverage, equivalent mutants, weak assertions, and missed edge cases. Automatically generates actionable test improvements and new test cases. Use when analyzing mutation testing results, improving test suite effectiveness, investigating low mutation scores, generating tests to kill surviving mutants, or enhancing test quality based on mutation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score and prioritize leads based on firmographic fit and behavioral engagement signals, producing ranked tiers for sales team focus. Use when the user requests lead scoring or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trading psychology, risk management discipline, position sizing psychology, drawdown management, behavioral bias mitigation, emotional discipline framework, loss aversion control

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit any Lattice SKILL.md for language compliance — removes rationale prose, converts soft language to imperatives, adds STOP: gates on hard rules, and cuts redundant repetition. Complements skill-review (which finds behavioral gaps) by fixing phrasing that causes agents to skip or underweight instructions at runtime. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'tighten this skill', 'clean up the language', 'make this more effective', 'reduce the bloat', 'tighten the language', or 'skill tighten'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full enhancement pipeline for an existing Lattice skill — rewrites a molecule or atom to modern-capable-model grade: restores degraded grammar, deduplicates, hardens gates and branching to one-unambiguous-action precision, verifies zero behavioral loss against a pre-capture diff, then runs the combined QA gate (skill-review, skill-tighten, skill-validate) and an independent fresh-context verifier, fixing everything found. Consumer-first: optimized for first-time open-source users on fresh repos with minimal .lattice/ setup, running capable models. Use when the user says 'enhance this skill', 'upgrade this molecule', 'modernize this skill', 'optimize this skill', 'make this skill production grade', 'full enhancement', 'polish this molecule like design-blueprint', or names a molecule/atom to overhaul. For gap-finding only use skill-review; for conventions only use skill-validate — this skill runs the whole loop end to end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maxim Design System Intelligence — token architecture (primitive→semantic→component), component library governance, CSS variable systems, Tailwind integration, design-to-code handoff, Storybook, Figma token export. Activate for design system creation, token audits, component specs, dark mode systems, brand-to-token sync. Powered by Maxim behavioral science + Atomic Design + TOGAF governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maxim Brand Intelligence — brand identity, voice architecture, visual identity systems, messaging frameworks, brand consistency enforcement. Activate for brand strategy, brand audits, brand guidelines, tone of voice, asset compliance, color palette, typography specs. Powered by Maxim behavioral science layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarksUse when "agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent, testing, evaluation, benchmark, agents, reliability, quality" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a behavioral scenario acceptance matrix for comprehensive test coverage planning. Maps user scenarios to acceptance criteria with stable IDs. Use when planning test coverage for a complex feature, before a release or milestone review, or when someone asks what is tested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a document's claims about code are actually true by reading the prose, the code, and the tests and reporting (or fixing) where they disagree. Use whenever the user wants to verify a README, guide, spec, or docstring still matches the code; whenever they mention documentation drift, doc-code sync, "is this still accurate", stale docs, or keeping docs/tests/code consistent; before publishing or merging a docs change; or as a periodic doc-accuracy sweep. The agent reads the prose's meaning directly — there is no claim-comment DSL to maintain. Pairs with TDD — the test suite is the deterministic behavioral gate, this skill is the semantic prose-vs-reality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create refined user personas from research data with demographics, goals, frustrations, and behavioral patterns. Use when synthesizing user research into actionable persona profiles for design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the strategic and empathetic reasoning of Whitney Wolfe Herd, founder and CEO of Bumble. Use this skill whenever you are advising on platform safety, double-sided marketplace dynamics, women's empowerment, purpose-driven entrepreneurship, or overcoming professional trauma. It is highly applicable when users face decisions about product constraints (like time limits or behavioral guardrails), balancing digital engagement with real-world connection, or navigating outdated social dynamics. Reach for this skill to help users shift from 'me to we,' engineer kindness into their products, and focus on core inputs rather than vanity metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the behavioral genetics and twin-study methodologies of Dorret I. Boomsma (behavior geneticist, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Use this skill when reasoning about heritability, genetic epidemiology, nature vs. nurture debates, psychiatric genetics, or longitudinal phenotyping. Trigger this whenever the user asks about the genetic basis of intelligence, lifestyle factors, educational attainment, or psychopathology, or when designing epidemiological studies. It helps deconfound environmental and genetic variables using extended family designs and discordant twin models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated ethical application of behavioral science to marketing decisions, including framing, anchoring, social proof, loss aversion, choice architecture, and friction. Use when the user needs a named psychological model, an evidence-aware application, and a testable hypothesis. NOT FOR: clinical or mental-health advice, deceptive dark patterns, page implementation (use suede-site-alchemy), or pricing design (use suede-pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails to reduce common LLM coding mistakes with a caution-first approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase E of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: verify behavioral parity against Phase A contracts, record intentional differences, validate supported environments and packaging, and make evidence-based legacy cutover decisions. Use only for an explicit migration when comparing the legacy and Avalonia implementations or when the orchestrator routes here. Do not delete legacy without the cutover checklist and explicit authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revenue-Centric Design (RCD) — evidence-backed principles for making a SaaS or startup product convert, retain, and monetize. Use when the user works on a landing page or CRO ("my page isn't converting"), onboarding/activation ("users sign up but don't stick"), churn/retention ("customers keep canceling"), pricing/monetization ("how should I price this"), checkout/forms ("dropdowns kill conversion", "annotated checkout"), dashboards/data viz ("cognitive load", "KPI shortlists"), positioning/ICP/go-to-market, feature scope, A/B-test rigor, or AI-era differentiation — or asks for the behavioral-science mechanism behind a design choice. Also use when another skill needs the principle or evidence behind a conversion/retention/pricing/checkout move. Never apply to gambling, betting, or casino products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run scored behavioral evaluations and repair gaps. Use when the user says "evaluate this agent" or "I want proof this behaves correctly"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive marketing expertise combining campaign execution, strategy frameworks, psychological principles, and 140+ marketing tactics. Use when planning campaigns, developing content strategy, applying behavioral science, generating marketing ideas, or building go-to-market strategies. Covers email, social, SEO, paid ads, content, and psychology-driven optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用户面对市场极端情绪时需要做出逆向来决策。当所有人都在买入/卖出、市场处于极端乐观/悲观时。 语言信号："所有人都在赚钱"/"这次不一样"/"市场要崩了要不要全卖"/"再不买就来不及了" 不适用于：正常市场环境下的投资决策、纯基本面分析。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。