Use MemoryBench to run repeatable conversational memory and RAG benchmarks across providers, datasets, judge models, checkpoints, and structured reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
821 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use MemoryBench to run repeatable conversational memory and RAG benchmarks across providers, datasets, judge models, checkpoints, and structured reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run CIS benchmark checks against cluster nodes and control planes when an agent needs a narrow Kubernetes hardening audit, not a general platform listing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score deep research agents on benchmark tasks using factual verification, report-quality scoring, and process evaluation before model or workflow changes ship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a real-task benchmark suite against OpenClaw agents so model or harness changes can be compared before they hit production workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building imp, running its test suite, checking CI status, or debugging build/test failures - "make build", "run the tests", "test-gpu", "verify-fast", GTEST_FILTER, Docker/CUDA toolchain, dependency bumps, "CI is red/blocked", "which gate failed", stale objects / segfault after a header edit, hook edits, docker-entrypoint env vars, determinism or perplexity checks. Do NOT use for benchmarking/profiling (benchmark-cuda) or output-quality batteries (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews startup financial models for investor readiness: validates unit economics, stress-tests runway scenarios, and benchmarks metrics against stage-appropriate targets. Use the full review, about 10–15 minutes, when the user provides a financial model (Excel, CSV, or a model pasted as text) and asks for review, validation, runway analysis, or unit-economics scoring. For a single money question with figures to compute, such as 'how long do I have?' or 'is a 4x burn multiple bad?', use its shorter quick check, so the answer comes from the calculator and dated benchmarks, not mental arithmetic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run GGUF models directly, load LoRA adapters, benchmark inference speed, and serve models via llama-server using llama.cpp. Includes Qwen 3.5 serve scripts (9B dense + F16, 35B MoE) with asymmetric KV cache and thinking mode. Secondary to Ollama; use when needing direct model control or LoRA hot-loading. Triggers on 'llama.cpp', 'GGUF', 'LoRA adapter', 'benchmark inference', 'llama-server'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run and explain the RuField deterministic synthetic benchmark and local sensing dashboard. Use for a RuField demo, quickstart, benchmark baseline, or viewer smoke test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Molecular ML with diverse featurizers and pre-built datasets. Use for property prediction (ADMET, toxicity) with traditional ML or GNNs when you want extensive featurization options and MoleculeNet benchmarks. Best for quick experiments with pre-trained models, diverse molecular representations. For ready-made ADMET numbers without training a model use admet-prediction; for benchmark datasets and task-aware splits use pytdc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Salary Benchmarking — market range by role/location/experience, total comp breakdown (base, bonus, equity, benefits), recruiter negotiation talking points
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides guidance for automatically evolving and optimizing AI agents across any domain using LLM-driven evolution algorithms. Use when building self-improving agents, optimizing agent prompts and skills against benchmarks, or implementing automated agent evaluation loops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect and analyze public X posts from keywords, hashtags, OR queries, domains, or known post URLs, then trace them to primary sources, official docs, GitHub repos, benchmarks, and reusable images. Use for launch-day reactions to a new model or product, event hashtags, keynote coverage, new-technology use cases, popularity research, or turning noisy X posts into a source-backed research note. Triggers: X で調べて, X の反応, ハッシュタグ調査, キーワードで X 検索, X 投稿からネタ探し. Not for posting or account operations on X.
Create reproducible animated infographic GIFs from structured data or measured results, with audience-language labels, explicit timing semantics, representative-frame QA, and a static fallback. Use when asked for GIF生成, animated infographic, 動的インフォグラフィック, 結果が流れる図, animated benchmark, or a blog/SNS animation whose displayed metrics must remain traceable to source data.
Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. (gstack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Conduct compensation benchmarking analysis to position salaries against market data. Use this skill when the user needs to assess pay competitiveness, build salary bands, or analyze pay equity — even if they say 'are we paying market rate', 'salary benchmarking', or 'compensation analysis'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark franchise locations by comparing top and bottom quartile performance across revenue, profitability, and operational scores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**MEASUREMENT SKILL** — Benchmark framework for measuring skill effectiveness. A/B tests agent outputs with and without a target skill, scoring correctness, completeness, and pattern adherence. USE FOR: validating skill quality, comparing before/after skill changes, proving skill ROI with data. DO NOT USE FOR: general testing, unit tests, CI pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
將高風險產品目標轉成可否證、benchmark-gated R&D;可分發專案/Skill 的迭代與收尾預設納入 GitHub 安全更新、回滾及舊版淘汰。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An Agentforce agent is moving from build or sandbox to live end-user traffic and the team needs a comprehensive readiness gate: coverage testing, Trust Layer config, guardrails, cost telemetry, observability, rate limits, permissions, rollout strategy, rollback plan, performance benchmarks. Triggers: 'we want to ship our Agentforce agent next week', 'pre-prod readiness review for our Service Agent', 'what do we need before turning the agent on for real customers', 'agent went live and is hallucinating, what should we have caught', 'cost monitoring for our internal sales agent', 'rollout strategy from internal pilot to GA'. NOT for the lighter five-block activation sign-off artifact — use agentforce/agent-deployment-checklist. NOT for authoring the guardrails themselves — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails. NOT for building the test harness — use agentforce/agentforce-eval-harness. NOT for Trust Layer feature setup in isolation — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to define, document, and validate KPI metrics for CRM Analytics — covering metric formula design, dimension selection, target-dataset modeling, benchmark setting, and the KPI register that must exist before any dashboard or lens is built. Trigger keywords: KPI definition CRM Analytics, analytics metric design, analytics target attainment, CRM Analytics measures vs dimensions, analytics benchmark. NOT for laying out the dashboard or lens itself — use admin/analytics-dashboard-design. NOT for scoping data sources, audiences, and drill-down paths — use admin/analytics-requirements-gathering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to make something faster, try many variants, run recursive optimization, benchmark latency/throughput/cost, or choose the best implementation by repeated measured tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Benchmark Email tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。