「comp」の検索結果

Use when the user needs to understand competitors — direct, indirect, and substitute tiers, positioning map, SWOT, ad and content benchmark, pricing comparison, and the market gap to attack, using SimilarWeb, Ahrefs, Semrush, and the Meta Ad Library. Trigger on 'competitor research', 'competitive analysis', 'what are competitors running', 'who else sells this', 'why do people pick them over us', 'benchmark us against the market'. Also use when the user sends a competitor link and asks for an opinion. Not for — understanding the customer rather than the rival, see `09-customer-insight-global`; turning difference into a statement, see `58-positioning-global`; paid targeting, see `51-audience-research-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide to interpreting BUSCO completeness statuses: why Duplicated BUSCOs count as complete, parsing output files, computing/comparing completeness across proteomes/genomes, common counting mistakes. Use when running BUSCO QC, comparing assemblies, or reporting completeness. See also: prokka-genome-annotation for annotation workflows feeding BUSCO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pulls financial statement numbers for US public companies straight from SEC EDGAR's free official XBRL APIs (companyfacts, companyconcept, frames, submissions) into a cited table. Every value carries its accession number, form, fiscal period, filed date, XBRL tag and a link to the filing, and the tool handles fiscal-year ends, quarterly vs YTD vs TTM, derived Q4, restatements and units. Use this whenever the user wants 10-K numbers or 10-Q numbers, says "pull financials for", asks for public company revenue, net income, EPS, cash, debt or capex, wants comps or a competitor side-by-side, a credit check, prospect research, or model inputs, or mentions SEC filings or EDGAR, even if they never say XBRL. Free and primary-source, no paid data terminal needed. Do not use it for private companies, stock prices or valuation multiples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides continuous privacy compliance monitoring implementation including automated control testing, evidence collection automation, real-time compliance dashboards, alert-based remediation workflows, regulatory change integration, and deviation management. Covers GRC platform configuration, control framework mapping, and compliance-as-code approaches. Keywords: continuous compliance, automated monitoring, evidence collection, dashboard, regulatory change, compliance-as-code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comparable company analysis, trading comps, peer multiples, EV/EBITDA comparison, P/E benchmarking, comps table, relative valuation, industry multiples, precedent transactions, trading comparable analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create sales-ready competitive battlecards comparing your product against a specific competitor — positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and win/loss patterns. Use when preparing sales teams, creating competitive materials, or responding to 'why not competitor X?'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX frontend stack -- decision tree and orchestrator for choosing between Stimulus, Turbo, TwigComponent, LiveComponent, UX Icons, and UX Map. Use when the user is unsure which tool fits, wants to combine multiple UX packages, or asks a general frontend architecture question in Symfony. Also trigger when the user asks "which UX package should I use", "how to make this interactive", "should I use Stimulus or LiveComponent", "how to structure my Symfony frontend", "what is the difference between Turbo and LiveComponent", "should this be a Frame or a LiveComponent", "how do these UX packages work together", "what is the Symfony way to do frontend". Do NOT trigger when the user clearly names a specific tool (stimulus, turbo, twig-component, live-component, ux-icons, ux-map) -- defer to the specialized skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Blender's compositor post-processes renders with a node graph, and this skill scripts it from Python (bpy) in Blender 5.x. Use when the user wants to set up compositor nodes, add post-processing effects, color correct renders, combine render passes, apply blur or glare, key green screens, write passes to multilayer EXR, or port a compositing script that broke after Blender 5.0 (scene.node_tree, CompositorNodeComposite, glare_type and file_slots are gone).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

音乐制作 / 混音 (音乐制作 / 混音 (Music Production & Mixing) — 录音棚与卧室工作室里把一首歌从编曲/录音/编程做到混音/母带成品的工程+艺术认知操作系统，面向制作人(producer)、混音师(mixing engineer)、母带工程师(mastering engineer)、beatmaker、唱作人/bedroom producer，以及想入行/服务这行(录音棚、plugin 厂商、sample 公司)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **服务歌曲/情绪 (serve the song / emotion-first: 技术只为打动人，'if it sounds good it is good'，用耳朵不用眼睛) ⇄ 技术正确/工程纪律 (technical correctness: gain staging 增益结构、headroom 余量、相位 phase、监听校准、LUFS 响度规范)**; **黄金耳朵/直觉混音 (mix by ears, reference-driven, 不看分析仪) ⇄ 看表/分析仪/规则 (mix by metrics: EQ 曲线、频谱仪 spectrum analyzer、相关计 correlation meter)**; **少即是多/减法混音 (subtractive, 'less is more', 录好源头 = 混音成功一半) ⇄ 重度处理/'we'll fix it in the mix' (heavy processing, 后期补救)**; **In-the-box 全数字 (ITB: DAW + 插件，召回方便，bedroom 可达专业) ⇄ 模拟硬件/outboard (analog console + 硬件，'mojo'/谐波染色 vs 召回噩梦)**; **人性化/groove/不完美 (humanize, push/pull, 'the feel') ⇄ 量化/网格/修音 (quantize to grid, pitch-correct, 'in the pocket' 靠编辑)**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — 编曲制作 arrangement/production → 录音/编程 tracking/programming → 编辑 editing (comping 选段/quantize/pitch-correct/time-align) → 混音 mixing (gain staging → balance 平衡 → EQ → compression → 空间 reverb/delay → 自动化 automation → 总线/母线处理 bus/mix-bus) → 母带 mastering (响度/EQ/限制 limiting/dither/排序+间隔) → 交付 delivery (DDP/streaming spec/stems); (c) 工具栈 — DAW (Pro Tools 录音棚标准/Ableton Live 电子+现场/Logic Pro Mac 性价比/FL Studio beatmaker/Cubase/Studio One/Reaper); 插件 (EQ: FabFilter Pro-Q/SSL/API; 压缩: 1176/LA-2A/SSL bus comp 及其复刻 Waves/UAD/Plugin Alliance; 混响: Valhalla/Lexicon/Bricasti; 调音: Auto-Tune/Melodyne; 限制器 limiter: Pro-L 2/Ozone); 硬件 (监听音箱 monitors: Yamaha NS-10/Genelec; 声学处理 acoustic treatment; 转换器 converters: Apollo/RME; 话筒 mics: U47/SM7B/57); 采样/音色 (Splice/sample packs/Kontakt/Serum 合成器); (d) 知识正典 — Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio (Mike Senior)、The Mixing Engineer's Handbook / Recording Engineer's Handbook (Bobby Owsinski)、Zen and the Art of Mixing (Mixerman)、The Art of Mixing (David Gibson 可视化)、Modern Recording Techniques、Sound on Sound 杂志、Mix With The Masters 大师课、Pensado's Place; (e) figures/流派 — 混音大师 (Chris Lord-Alge CLA 摇滚/Andrew Scheps 'Stadium' 3-bus/Tony Maserati/Manny Marroquin/Serban Ghenea 流行隐形混音/Michael Brauer multing); 制作人 (Rick Rubin 减法/氛围、Quincy Jones、Dr. Dre 完美主义、Max Martin 流行结构、Jack Antonoff、Finneas bedroom→Grammy、Metro Boomin/trap、Timbaland、Pharrell); 母带 (Bob Katz K-system/响度战争批判、Bob Ludwig、Greg Calbi); 教育者 (Mike Senior、Pensado、Warren Huart Produce Like A Pro、Dan Worrall 技术深挖); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — gain staging/headroom/LUFS/true peak/comping/bouncing/printing/stems/DI/reamp/sidechain/parallel compression 并行压缩/mid-side/bus/aux/send-return/dry-wet/transient/sibilance/de-ess/pumping/mud 浑浊/harsh 刺耳/boxy/muddy/in the pocket/the pocket/quantize/swing/groove/vibe/mojo/reference track/A/B/recall/print/glue 胶水; (g) 争议/批判 — 响度战争 loudness war (Bob Katz/Loudness Penalty/streaming 归一化 LUFS 终结了吗)、修音/Auto-Tune 之争 (artistic vs cheating)、ITB vs 模拟玄学 (硬件 'warmth' 是否安慰剂、null test 盲测)、preset/AI 混音 (iZotope/LANDR/sample-based 是否毁了 craft)、bedroom producer 民主化 vs 录音棚消亡、'loudness'/over-compression、plugin 复刻 vs 真硬件、Spotify normalization 对母带的影响、过度依赖 reference/抄袭; (h) 创意 vs 技术张力是本行业 deep tacit 知识的核心 — 大量隐性 '听感' 知识难以言传，靠 reference/学徒/千小时积累。不含: 现场扩声 live sound/PA、音乐理论/作曲 composition (虽相关但聚焦录音棚后期制作)、配乐/film scoring (虽相关但聚焦歌曲制作)、纯硬件电子工程/合成器 DIY、音乐商业/版权/发行 (虽相关但聚焦制作技艺本身)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 音乐制作 / 混音 (Music Production & Mixing) — 录音棚与卧室工作室里把一首歌从编曲/录音/编程做到混音/母带成品的工程+艺术认知操作系统，面向制作人(producer)、混音师(mixing engineer)、母带工程师(mastering engineer)、beatmaker、唱作人/bedroom producer，以及想入行/服务这行(录音棚、plugin 厂商、sample 公司)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **服务歌曲/情绪 (serve the song / emotion-first: 技术只为打动人，'if it sounds good it is good'，用耳朵不用眼睛) ⇄ 技术正确/工程纪律 (technical correctness: gain staging 增益结构、headroom 余量、相位 phase、监听校准、LUFS 响度规范)**; **黄金耳朵/直觉混音 (mix by ears, reference-driven, 不看分析仪) ⇄ 看表/分析仪/规则 (mix by metrics: EQ 曲线、频谱仪 spectrum analyzer、相关计 correlation meter)**; **少即是多/减法混音 (subtractive, 'less is more', 录好源头 = 混音成功一半) ⇄ 重度处理/'we'll fix it i

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-grade components for React, Vue 3, and Svelte 5 with all states (loading, empty, error, success, idle), TypeScript strict, WCAG 2.2 accessibility, server components (RSC), and compound component patterns. Includes scaffold script, reference patterns, and template files for React and Vue. Use when user asks to create a UI component, frontend module, or design system component. Do NOT use for page layouts (use landing-craft), routing, or state management architecture (global stores).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress PDF files with ComPDF while balancing file size and readable visual quality. Use for PDF optimization, resolution control, compression strategies, and removal of non-essential document content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate an external competency framework like DigComp, GreenComp, or ISTE into classroom-ready activities. Use when implementing framework standards in specific teaching contexts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design compensation framework - salary bands, equity philosophy, offer templates, and total comp benchmarking. Use when asked to "design our comp bands", "how much equity should we give", "is our comp competitive", or "write an offer template".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitive analysis ending in a clear positioning call — where to play, how to win. Use when asked to "analyze competitors", "competitive landscape", "how do we compare to X", "competitive positioning", "where should we play", "find our white space", or "who else does this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prisma Compute deployment and hosting guide. Use whenever the user mentions Prisma Compute, `prisma.compute.ts`, `defineComputeConfig`, deploying or hosting a Prisma app, `@prisma/cli app deploy`, `compute:deploy`, `create-prisma --deploy`, `PRISMA_SERVICE_TOKEN`, Compute auth/workspaces, apps/deployments/build logs/domains, localhost vs `0.0.0.0`, deploy port binding, or framework deploy readiness for Hono, Elysia, Next.js, TanStack Start, Astro, Nuxt, Svelte, Nest, Turborepo, or custom/prebuilt artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps a startup's competitive landscape, scores moat strength across 6+ dimensions, and writes an investor-ready competition narrative with a positioning map. Use when the user asks for a competitive landscape, moat analysis, or positioning review and gives enough to work from: a deck, a list of competitors, or a clearly named startup. A full run takes about 30–40 minutes and searches the web, so for a passing question such as 'who are my competitors?' or 'is that a real moat?', answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, the competitor set and moat scores are checked adversarially, never recalled from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5つの専門エージェントがディスカッション型で競合のビジネスモデル・機能・価格・弱点を網羅的に分析し、 差別化ポイントと参入戦略を導出するスキル。 エージェント同士が対話・批判し合いながら調査し、ca-data-critic がライブモデレーターとして矛盾を検出・収束を判定する。 Phase 1 で競合プロファイル・レビュー・機能をディスカッション型で調査し、 Phase 2 でポジショニング戦略家が統合。 Gate 1（中間合意形成）→ Gate 2（最終検証 + Independent Validation + Devil's Advocate）の2段階ゲートで品質を担保。 Use when: 競合を分析したい、差別化ポイントを見つけたい、 市場のプレイヤーを調べたい、ポジショニングを考えたい。 Triggers: "競合分析", "competitive analysis", "競合調査", "差別化", "ポジショニング", "competitor", "競合", "市場プレイヤー", "ライバル調査", "competitive landscape"

Assess and improve garden soil through testing, amendment, composting, and biodynamic preparations. Covers jar test, spade test, earthworm count, amendment by soil type (clay, sandy, depleted, compacted), composting methods (hot, cold, vermicomposting), no-till practices, cover cropping, and biodynamic preparations 500-508. Use when starting a new garden bed, when plants underperform despite adequate water and light, when transitioning to organic or biodynamic practice, when soil has become compacted or depleted, or when building a composting system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a compliance architecture that maps applicable regulations to computerized systems. Covers system inventory, criticality classification (GxP-critical, GxP-supporting, non-GxP), GAMP 5 category assignment, regulatory requirements traceability, and governance structure definition. Use when establishing a new regulated facility, formalising compliance across multiple systems, addressing a regulatory gap analysis, harmonising compliance after mergers or reorganisations, or preparing a site master file that references computerized systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map who is winning an SEO market with measured data — recurring SERP domains, organic footprints, winning content themes, backlink authority, and the gaps worth attacking. Use this skill for market-level questions ("who ranks for X", "how competitive is this space", "where are the SEO openings") before committing to keyword targets or content themes. For one named competitor, use openseo-competitor-analysis instead. Triggers: "competitive landscape seo", "who ranks for", "seo market map", "how competitive is", "serp competitors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。