249 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes single pattern implementation, calculates 4 scores (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation), identifies gaps. Invoked by ln-640 or standalone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial implementation review based on Block's g3 dialectical autocoding research. Use when validating implementation completeness against requirements with fresh objectivity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates and summarizes the four required authorization forms in a personal injury matter (retainer, HIPAA release, insurance authorization, employment record release). Confirms signatures, dates, scope, and completeness to determine readiness for the investigation phase. Use when reviewing client onboarding packets, verifying authorization forms before discovery, or checking HIPAA and record-release compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ticket/PRD intake: product-area classification, completeness scoring, RCA, technical assessment. Works with Jira, Linear, GitHub, or manual paste. Use to analyze or triage a ticket.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-to-requirement coverage mapping. Reads plan acceptance criteria and test files, produces a coverage gap report showing which requirements have no tests. Use during Phase 2 (Test) or Phase 4 (Review) to verify test completeness. Named after the Nyquist sampling theorem — sufficient test coverage prevents aliased (missed) requirements. NOT for running tests (see mk:testing); NOT for structural code review (see mk:review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies build output integrity after code changes. Runs builds, validates artifact structure, checks for regressions in bundle size, asset references, and static export completeness. The last line of defense before a bad deploy ships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer gene regulatory networks from bulk or general expression data with mutual-information (ARACNe) and tree-ensemble (GENIE3, GRNBoost2) methods, and infer transcription-factor protein activity from regulons with VIPER and msVIPER. Covers the activity-not-edges paradigm, the undirected-association caveat, the DREAM5 wisdom-of-crowds and method-complementarity result, AUPRC-over-AUROC evaluation, and gold-standard incompleteness. Use when inferring a regulatory network from a bulk expression matrix, finding master regulators, or scoring TF activity from a signature. For single-cell motif-pruned regulons see scenic-regulons; for co-expression modules see coexpression-networks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workflow Phase 10 — orchestrator for documentation work. Surveys the diff, routes any page on a documentation surface through `technical-writer`, standalone technical reference through the `documentation` skill, tutorials through `technical-tutorials`, and all other prose body work (inline docs, README updates, user-facing copy) through the `prose` skill (which mandates `humanizer` and conditionally `copywriting`). Verifies completeness and marks phase done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-angle review of responses before delivery. Audits from 4 perspectives -- factual accuracy, logical consistency, completeness, and safety. Use for high-stakes responses where errors have real consequences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level algorithms and complexity theory covering sorting, searching, graph algorithms, dynamic programming, greedy algorithms, NP-completeness, and algorithm design paradigms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level real analysis knowledge. Use when working with limits, continuity, differentiability, Riemann and Lebesgue integration, sequences and series of functions, metric spaces, measure theory, or functional analysis foundations. Also use when the user mentions 'epsilon-delta', 'uniform continuity', 'uniform convergence', 'Lebesgue integral', 'measure theory', 'sigma-algebra', 'Banach space', 'Hilbert space', 'completeness', 'compactness', 'Heine-Borel', or 'dominated convergence'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Research] Use when you need to review knowledge artifacts for completeness, citation quality, confidence accuracy, and template compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses the quality, composition, and usefulness of a lead list. Use when the user provides a lead list and wants completeness, distribution, quality issues, and recommended next actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit packages for documentation completeness, detect drift between code and docs, and maintain documentation quality across the monorepo. Use when checking package docs, running audits, or reviewing documentation health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
生成された仕様書ドキュメントセットの完成度を独立 context で評価したいとき、上位概念trace・意思決定・マトリクス網羅性・設計知識反映・最新ドキュメント出典・prompt品質の 6 観点で合否判定したいときに使う。
Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate custom quality checklists for validating requirements completeness and clarity. Use to create unit tests for English that ensure spec quality before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review meeting minutes documents for completeness, action item clarity, decision documentation, and consistency with source materials like hearing sheets. Use when validating meeting minutes quality or preparing minutes for distribution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write acceptance criteria for a Jira story using Given/When/Then scenarios. Use this skill when the user asks to write AC, acceptance criteria, write scenarios, improve a story, add AC to a ticket, or mentions a Jira ticket and wants better requirements. Also triggers on "write better AC", "this story needs AC", "add scenarios to this ticket", or when reviewing a Jira story for completeness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。