「concrete」の検索結果

Explains runtime errors and compilation failures with actionable debugging guidance. Use when Python or Java code throws runtime exceptions (NullPointerException, TypeError, AttributeError, etc.), compilation errors (syntax errors, type mismatches, import failures), or dependency issues. Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and provide concrete fixes with examples. Distinct from test-related errors - focuses on errors during normal code execution and build processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains test failures and provides actionable debugging guidance. Use when tests fail (unit, integration, E2E), builds fail, or code throws errors. Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and test output to identify root causes and suggest concrete fixes. Handles pytest, jest, junit, mocha, vitest, selenium, cypress, playwright, and other testing frameworks across Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, and other languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generates executable test cases from model checking counterexample traces. Translates abstract counterexample states and transitions into concrete test inputs, execution steps, and assertions that reproduce property violations. Use when working with model checker outputs (SPIN, CBMC, NuSMV, TLA+, Java PathFinder, etc.) and needing to create regression tests, validate bug fixes, or reproduce verification failures in executable test suites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs abstract interpretation to produce summarized execution traces and high-level program behavior representations. Highlights key control flow paths, variable relationships, loop invariants, function summaries, and potential runtime states using abstract domains (intervals, signs, nullness, etc.). Use when analyzing program behavior, understanding execution paths, computing loop invariants, tracking variable ranges, detecting potential runtime errors, or generating program summaries without concrete execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate prioritized CVE watchlists and actionable security recommendations for repositories. Use when analyzing CVE scan results, creating security reports, prioritizing vulnerability remediation, or generating security gate reports for CI/CD. Takes CVE scan results (JSON/SARIF from npm audit, pip-audit, Snyk), reachability analysis, and cutoff date as input. Combines severity, reachability, exploitability, and dependency criticality to rank CVEs by practical risk. Outputs markdown reports with concrete next-step guidance (immediate upgrade, monitor, ignore with justification, apply mitigation) suitable for issue trackers, security reviews, and CI security gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, calibrate, layer, and validate production Blender materials including bare and coated metal, brushed steel, rust, aged and wet wood planks, stone, concrete, plastic, glass, fabric, water, dirt, moss, and wetness. Use when material identity, UV direction, real-world texture scale, PBR channel handling, roughness response, anisotropy, normal/bump/displacement, transmission, volume absorption, aging, or surface layering determines realism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a PRD into independently-workable issues and write each as a local markdown file in issues/. Use when the user wants to turn a PRD into a list of concrete tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build polished, intentional UIs with concrete CSS/Tailwind values — typography, color, layout, spacing, dark mode, accessibility, animations, components. Encodes specific, opinionated rules with exact values, not vague advice. Covers buttons, cards, forms, tables, navigation, dashboards, landing pages, onboarding, and more. Triggers on "absolute ui", "design a UI", "style this component", "make this less like AI slop", "fix the spacing/typography/color", "dark mode", "design a pricing page", "make this look better".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Macro-driven trade idea generation, translating macroeconomic views into concrete stock ideas, sector selection from macro regime, international trade ideas via ADRs, cross-border idea sourcing, macro catalyst mapping to equity positions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing workflow skill for finding high-value test candidates, writing focused tests, generating realistic workloads, reviewing test value, and diagnosing test-suite health. Use for prompts about what to test next, adding or improving tests, reviewing whether a test is worth keeping, low-signal or flaky tests, workload scenarios, or test-suite trust. Do not use for general QA discussion unless the user wants a concrete testing workflow or artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate a vague request or GitHub issue into a concrete, testable spec using five structured elements (problem, scope, acceptance criteria, edge cases, success criterion) before writing any code. Prevents scope creep, PR churn, and mid-implementation pivots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn rich agent answers and any file, folder, URL, or export into a polished single-file HTML page. Auto-picks a default route plus 17 concrete design systems (teaching, dashboard, atlas, timeline-story, document, …).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose a failing TMDb integration-test run — summarise the failure, rank the likely cause, and suggest a concrete fix

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose a failing CI workflow run (lint, markdown lint, build, or unit tests) — identify which job failed, the cause, and a concrete fix

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has an AI-generated Xiaohongshu draft and wants it to sound more personal, concrete, platform-appropriate, and stronger in hook, retention, and interaction value. Trigger phrases: "去 AI 味", "不像我", "合规检查", "改得像真人", "开头不抓人", "没停留", "humanize draft", "platform check". Do not use for initial positioning or topic generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough idea, a bug, or a batch of unsolved problems into well-structured GitHub issue(s) and file them with `gh`, auto-classifying type + labels from the content (recommend, then confirm) and following Rove's conventions (beginner-friendly framing, concrete file pointers, an acceptance checklist, zero AI/Anthropic attribution). Handles single, batch, and "file the unsolved problems" modes. Use when the user says "file an issue", "open a GitHub issue", "draft a good first issue", "batch these as issues", "上报 issue", "提个 issue", "报个 bug", "把没解决的发上去", or wants to hand low-priority tasks to outside contributors. Distinct from the daemon-owned internal issue store (`rove api issue-*`); this skill is for outward-facing GitHub issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has an AI-generated Xiaohongshu draft and wants it to sound more personal, concrete, platform-appropriate, and stronger in hook, retention, and interaction value. Trigger phrases: "去 AI 味", "不像我", "合规检查", "改得像真人", "开头不抓人", "没停留", "humanize draft", "platform check". Do not use for initial positioning or topic generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds and finishes the last 20% of a built solution — the experiential layer agents skip: what the output actually reads like, which pages or screens should exist, first-run and empty states, opinionated defaults, the golden path. Use when planning any build so the magic gets specced as concretely as the plumbing, before calling any build "done", when a solution works but feels like a demo, or when the user says "last 20%", "finish this", "make it actually good", "is this actually done", or "why does this feel flat".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn rich agent answers and any file, folder, URL, or export into a polished single-file HTML page. Auto-picks a default route plus 17 concrete design systems (teaching, dashboard, atlas, timeline-story, document, …).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and revises a complete skill DIRECTORY — SKILL.md, scripts, references, assets — and packages it. Use for "create a skill for X", "turn this into a skill", "update/improve this skill", "why doesn't my skill trigger", "review this SKILL.md", "package this skill", or when a repeated procedure should become a reusable artifact. Enforces the structure that makes skills work — a concrete procedure rather than a goal statement, an explicit applicability boundary, failure modes with their signals, a runtime verification step, and a description checked against the existing catalogue for confusability. For choosing whether the instruction should be a skill at all rather than project instructions or a prompt, use crafting-instructions. For writing quality inside the prose, use writing-instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it turns a one-line idea into a concrete spec with testable criteria, ready for initial combined sprint review or explicit sequential approval. Five gated phases — frame, shape, refine, write, review-and-approve. No implementation before an approved spec; the caller retains required planning, execution and delivery ordering. Each acceptance criterion becomes one tdd Phase 1 obligation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a mind map plus written wonderings. Portable version, no vendor-specific tools required, works on any conversational assistant. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside the assistant: "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet". Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline, or a "which / what should I pick" question. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a fully-expanded mind map image plus the written wonderings. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside you — "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet" — or when they invoke /wonder or /wonderpill. Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline ("ideas I can ship this week"), or a "which / what should I pick" question — those want straight answers, not a wonder pill. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。