「exploit」の検索結果

Container escape and breakout techniques targeting Docker, containerd, and Podman runtimes. Covers privileged container breakout via host filesystem mount and nsenter, Docker socket abuse through /var/run/docker.sock, Linux capability exploitation including CAP_SYS_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_PTRACE, and CAP_NET_ADMIN, cgroup v1 notify_on_release escape, runc CVEs such as CVE-2019-5736 and CVE-2024-21626 Leaky Vessels, kernel exploits from within containers, and Dockerfile misconfigurations like --privileged and host namespace sharing. Includes enumeration with capsh, amicontained, deepce, CDK, and nsenter. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1611 Escape to Host. Use this skill when the engagement scope includes container breakout, Docker escape, container privilege escalation, host access from container, or when you land inside a containerized environment and need to reach the underlying host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester enumerate and exploit Microsoft

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for insecure direct object references," "find IDOR vulnerabilities," "exploit broken access control," "enumerate user IDs or object references," or "bypass authorization to access other users' data." It provides comprehensive guidance for detecting, exploiting, and remediating IDOR vulnerabilities in web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest AWS", "test AWS security", "enumerate IAM", "exploit cloud infrastructure", "AWS privilege escalation", "S3 bucket testing", "metadata SSRF", "Lambda exploitation", or needs guidance on Amazon Web Services security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

メモや文字起こしなどの素材を、読者が理解しやすい順序の記事に組み立てます。導入案や段落の役割を対話で確かめ、合意した文章を別ファイルに保存するスキル。

• 散らばったメモを記事にしたいとき
• 文字起こしから記事を組み立てる
• 執筆前に導入の切り口を比べる

集めた素材から記事の展開を複数提案し、選んだ内容を一段ずつ書き進めます。読者が知っている概念を確認し、必要な説明を先に置きながら文章を組み立てるスキルです。

• 収集済みのメモを記事にしたいとき
• 記事の書き出しを比較したいとき
• 初心者向けに説明順を整えたいとき

許可されたWebアプリを対象に、公開ページの調査から脆弱性の再現確認まで進め、証拠・影響・修正案をまとめたセキュリティ報告書を作るスキル。

• ステージングの脆弱性を調べたいとき
• 疑わしい脆弱性を再現確認したいとき
• 証拠と修正案を報告書にまとめたいとき

Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy static-analysis alert. Covers injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control and IDOR, insecure deserialization, secrets in code, unsafe dependencies, and business-logic flaws. Use when the user asks to security-scan, security-review, or audit their code, repo, or pull request for vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pentest a web app or website end to end — black-box testing of a live URL, staging environment, or local dev server that finds and exploits real vulnerabilities (auth bypass, broken access control, IDOR, injection, XSS, SSRF, business logic) and proves each one with a working proof-of-concept instead of a signature match. Runs with Strix, either the self-hosted open-source CLI or the managed app.strix.ai cloud. Use when the user asks to pentest, hack, security-test, or audit their web app, website, web application, or staging site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application security testing (AppSec) across a whole product with Strix — decide which asset needs which test (source code, running web app, API, CI pipeline), run it, and turn the results into a ranked remediation plan. Autonomous agents exploit and prove each issue instead of emitting static-analysis alerts, so the plan is ordered by what is actually reachable. Use when the user asks for an application security review or audit, an appsec assessment, vulnerability scanning across their stack, a security review before a launch or a customer security questionnaire, or does not yet know which kind of security test they need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test an application against the OWASP Top 10 with Strix — autonomous AI agents that attempt real exploits for each category of the current OWASP Top 10:2025 (broken access control including SSRF, security misconfiguration, software supply chain failures, cryptographic failures, injection, insecure design, authentication failures, integrity failures, logging and alerting failures, mishandling of exceptional conditions) and report only what they could actually prove, mapped back to the category with a proof-of-concept. Also covers the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023). Use when the user asks for an OWASP Top 10 assessment, OWASP compliance testing, or a security review mapped to OWASP categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix security vulnerabilities found by a Strix pentest (open-source CLI or app.strix.ai cloud) — triage by severity, patch the root cause rather than the symptom, and re-run Strix to prove each fix actually closes the exploit. Handles injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control, IDOR, and other validated findings. Use after a Strix scan reports findings, or when the user asks to remediate, patch, or fix security issues from a strix_runs report, vulnerabilities.json, findings.sarif, or a cloud scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security-test a REST, GraphQL, or gRPC API with Strix — autonomous agents that enumerate endpoints from an OpenAPI/GraphQL schema (or by crawling), then actually exploit the API-specific vulnerability classes in the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) — broken object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR), broken object property level authorization (excessive data exposure and mass assignment), broken function-level authorization, unrestricted resource consumption, SSRF, injection, and auth/token flaws. Every finding comes with a working proof-of-concept request. Use when the user asks to pentest, security-test, audit, or find vulnerabilities in an API, endpoint, or backend service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide comprehensive techniques for penetration testing AWS cloud environments. Covers IAM enumeration, privilege escalation, SSRF to metadata endpoint, S3 bucket exploitation, Lambda code extraction, and persistence techniques for red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Default entrypoint and master ctf-sandbox-orchestrator workflow for CTF, exploit, reverse engineering, DFIR, pwnable, crypto, stego, mobile, AI-agent, cloud, container, Active Directory, Windows-host, and identity challenges. Use first when the user presents challenge infrastructure, binaries, prompts, hosts, or identities that should be treated as sandbox-internal by default and Codex needs to choose, route, and load the right downstream analysis path with concise evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes reverse engineering, exploitation, penetration testing, malware, mobile, firmware, browser automation, documentation, and security tasks to the appropriate specialist skill. Use when a task spans modules or the correct reverse-skill entrypoint is unclear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-day 补丁差分到利用。从厂商发布的补丁里反推漏洞点、写 PoC、做成可用的攻击模块。 适用场景：已知 CVE 编号但只有补丁没有 PoC、SRC/红队需要打击未及时更新的资产、N-day 武器化、Patch Tuesday 跟进。 核心方法：拿 before/after 二进制 → 对齐符号 → 二进制 diff → 看新增的安全检查反推 bug class → 写 PoC 触发漏洞。 触发关键词：N-day、Nday、补丁差分、patch diff、patch tuesday、1day、binary diff 漏洞、bindiff 利用、ghidriff、Diaphora、补丁分析、CVE 复现、漏洞还原、补丁反推、N-day 武器化。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploits privileged pods, host mounts, runC CVEs, and exposed Docker sockets to break out of a container and reach the underlying host during an authorized container-security assessment. Use when executing an approved breakout test, demonstrating the real impact of a privileged or hostPath workload, or validating that escape mitigations actually hold. Keywords: container breakout, privileged, hostPath, docker.sock, runC CVE-2019-5736, CVE-2024-21626, release_agent, nsenter. Do not use for defensive detection of these techniques - use detecting-container-escape-attempts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run CloudFox's read-only Describe/List/Get enumeration (all-checks, role-trusts, secrets, endpoints, and permissions commands) to map AWS and Azure attack paths and surface exploitable misconfigurations. Use immediately after obtaining a cloud credential to build situational awareness, find exposed resources and secrets, or map sts:AssumeRole trust relationships for lateral-movement/privilege-escalation planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect abuse of elevation control mechanisms (T1548), including Windows UAC bypass via auto-elevating binaries like fodhelper.exe and Linux sudo/setuid/setgid exploitation, by monitoring registry changes, integrity-level transitions, and parent-child process relationships via Sysmon and Windows Security events. Use when hunting privilege-escalation activity or validating elevation-abuse detection coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect privilege escalation attempts across Windows and Linux, including access token manipulation, UAC bypass, unquoted service path abuse, kernel exploits, and sudo/doas abuse. Use when threat hunting for T1068-style privilege escalation, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on suspicious privilege changes, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。