「flags」の検索結果

Use whenever you run statistical analysis for the social sciences (regression, hypothesis tests, econometrics) or read Stata (.dta) / SPSS (.sav) data in this workspace. Enforces an execute-don't-interpret boundary (surface estimates, don't volunteer causal claims), checks the analysis against a preregistration plan for HARKing, verifies reproducible seeds, and reproduces .dta/.sav estimates via R. Flags integrity risks; never certifies the analysis is sound.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translates every clause of a contract from legalese into clear, plain English with flags for deliberately confusing or misleading language

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial visual-layout audit of a Quarto `.qmd` or Beamer `.tex` deck. Flags overflow, font inconsistency, box fatigue, spacing, and alignment issues. Use when user says "visual audit", "check the layout", "does this overflow?", "look for visual issues", "audit the slides", or after reworking a deck's appearance. Does NOT check writing or pedagogy — pair with `/proofread` or `/pedagogy-review`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a structured preregistration document (OSF, AsPredicted, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a research spec or free-form study description. Output is a Markdown file with hypotheses, design, sampling plan, analysis plan, exclusions, and inference criteria — annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when user says "preregister", "draft a preregistration", "OSF preregistration", "AsPredicted", "AEA RCT registry", "PAP", "preanalysis plan", or before launching an experiment / data collection / analysis on data the analyst has not yet seen. NOT a registry submission tool — produces a document the user uploads to OSF / AsPredicted / AEA themselves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Installs and configures ktx, the open-source context layer for data agents — runs ktx setup non-interactively with hidden CLI flags, configures database connections and embeddings, installs agent integration, and verifies readiness. Use when the user asks an agent to add ktx to a project, connect data sources, install agent rules, ingest schema, or troubleshoot a local ktx install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts an arxiv paper into a minimal, citation-anchored Python implementation. Trigger when user runs /paper2code with an arxiv URL or paper ID, says "implement this paper", or pastes an arxiv link asking for implementation. Flags all ambiguities honestly. Never invents implementation details not stated in the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experiment design reference for problem-class framing, Minimum Viable Experiment coaching, hypothesis formation, vetting and red flags, and experiment readiness. Use when translating a stated business outcome into candidate data-science problem classes, or when framing, vetting, scoping, or evaluating an experiment of any kind, including data feasibility, architecture, LLM, performance, use-case, UX, prototyping, and hardware experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /sync as the last step after a change is complete, around merge, to keep durable knowledge current. Updates root and nested AGENTS.md, reconciles the scope from repo evidence, and flags specs the change made stale. Surgical edits only: it adds lines, and rewrites single lines it owns. Never a whole section, never curated prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode a mainland China labour contract (劳动合同) before signing: probation, pay and its structure, working hours, social insurance, non-compete and confidentiality, termination terms and anything that conflicts with the Labour Contract Law. Use when asked 帮我看看劳动合同, 劳动合同有什么坑, 试用期合法吗, 竞业限制条款, or review my Chinese employment contract. Produces a clause-by-clause decode with red, amber and green flags, the statutory limits each clause must respect, the questions to ask HR, and suggested wording for changes. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode a mortgage Closing Disclosure line by line — which fees are real, which are shoppable or junk, and what changed since the Loan Estimate. Use when asked to decode my closing disclosure, review my closing costs, why did my costs go up, or which fees can I negotiate. Produces a section-by-section decode, the Loan-Estimate comparison with tolerance flags, the challenge list with scripts, and the cash-to-close verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spot a bad client before you sign — the warning signs of the projects that turn into unpaid, scope-creeping nightmares, and how to screen, price, or decline them. Use when asked is this client a red flag, should I take this client, screening a difficult client, or how to avoid bad clients. Produces a read on the warning signs present (haggling, vagueness, disrespect, urgency, unrealistic expectations), what each predicts, screening questions to ask before committing, protective terms if you proceed anyway, and how to decline gracefully — so you avoid the clients who cost more than they pay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a consulting client discovery session — uncover the real problem, scope, and decision process. Use when asked to prepare for a client discovery call, qualify a consulting lead, scope an engagement, or run a kickoff. Produces a discovery plan — the questions that surface the real problem (not the stated one), budget/authority/timeline qualifiers, success criteria, red flags, and a follow-up that leads to a proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 出口报关需要什么单证, 报关资料清单, 申报要素怎么填, 报关单和发票对不上, 出口退税需要的单证, 进口清关资料, or prepare customs documents for an export or import shipment in mainland China. Produces a document checklist for this shipment (报关单 data, 商业发票, 装箱单, 合同, 委托书, licences and certificates), a cross-document consistency check, the 申报要素 to prepare for the HS code, inspection and licence flags, the timeline with the customs broker, and the records to keep for the export rebate, all marked to confirm with the broker and customs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare childcare options — nursery/daycare, childminder, nanny, family, or a mix — for your family's real needs, budget, and values. Use when asked to compare childcare options, nursery vs nanny, how to choose childcare, or find the right childcare. Produces a needs-and-values profile, a side-by-side of the realistic options on cost/flexibility/socialization/control, the questions to ask and red flags to check on visits, a total-cost read (including subsidies), and a decision that fits your priorities — not a generic ranking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a bill of materials for cost, risk, and supply exposure — cost rollup, top-10 cost drivers, single-source and EOL risk, MOQ vs forecast mismatch, cost-down candidates, and tariff/logistics sensitivity. Use when asked to review a BOM, find cost-down opportunities, check component sourcing risk, or sanity-check BOM cost against target. Produces a structured BOM review with a cost driver Pareto, risk flags per line, and a prioritised cost-down list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and risk-rate hidden assumptions in a product brief or PRD. Use when asked to review a product brief for assumptions, audit a PRD for risks, find hidden assumptions, validate product plans, or run an assumption analysis. Produces a prioritised assumption map with confidence and impact scores, recommended validation methods, and critical assumption flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode an auto repair estimate — what each line actually is, which items are urgent vs upsell, and the questions that separate a fair shop from a fishing expedition. Use when someone asks 'is this repair quote fair', 'decode my mechanic's estimate', 'do I really need all this', or 'is the shop ripping me off'. Produces a line-by-line decode with urgency triage, parts/labor sanity checks, ranked red flags, and the exact questions to ask the shop before authorizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode an employment benefits package into what it's actually worth and where the fine print bites. Use when someone asks 'is this offer good', 'decode my benefits package', 'what does my equity actually mean', or 'what should I ask HR before signing'. Produces a benefit-by-benefit decode with real dollar values, ranked red flags (vesting cliffs, clawbacks, 'discretionary' bonuses, unlimited-PTO economics), and the questions to ask HR before signing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the beneficiary designations that quietly override wills — the account-by-account sweep, the life-event triggers that make them stale, and the coordination check against actual intentions. Use when asked check my beneficiaries, does my 401k go to my ex, do beneficiary forms beat a will, or what should I update after marriage/divorce/a birth. Produces the account sweep list, the stale-designation red flags, the intent-vs-paperwork comparison table, and the update checklist with the verify-in-writing step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits American Anthropologist (AA) and which section to target. AA is the four-field AAA flagship, so the test is significance across anthropology (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the question and pick a section; it does not collect data or conduct fieldwork.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualifies inbound leads against full ICP criteria — company size, industry, use case fit, role/seniority of the person. Checks CRM and existing customer base for duplicates and existing relationships. Outputs a scored CSV with qualification status, reasoning, and pipeline overlap flags. Tool-agnostic — works with any CRM, enrichment tool, or data source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。