「proposal」の検索結果

Track Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) implementation progress by comparing Confluence specs against codebase evidence. Use when asked to assess, report on, or compare AIP status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts Word (.docx) documents into Markdown so their contents can be accurately analyzed, summarized, searched, or extracted from. Use this skill whenever the user shares, references, or asks about a .docx file — even if they don't say "convert" or "markdown" explicitly. This includes requests to "read", "summarize", "review", "extract data from", "compare", or "analyze" a Word document, resume, report, contract, or proposal. Always run the bundled conversion script to produce Markdown first; do not attempt to parse .docx content directly or write ad-hoc conversion code. Also use this skill for batch requests involving a whole folder of Word documents. IMPORTANT: When the user references a folder or set of documents containing multiple file types (.pdf, .docx, .xlsx), invoke ALL three sibling skills — convert-pdf-to-md, convert-word-to-md, and convert-excel-to-md — so no file type is silently skipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an auditable evidence map for a contested technical choice, research synthesis, proposal review, or consequential decision. Use when Copilot must preserve supporting, contradicting, qualifying, and missing evidence with exact source regions instead of collapsing disagreement into prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a .docx file is involved -- as input, output, or both. This includes: creating Word documents, reports, letters, memos, or proposals; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .docx file; editing, modifying, or updating existing documents; working with templates, tracked changes, comments, headers/footers, or tables of contents. Trigger whenever the user mentions 'Word doc', 'document', 'report', 'letter', 'memo', or references a .docx filename.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill applies brand guidelines to content creation. It should be used when the user asks to "write an email", "draft a proposal", "create a pitch deck", "write a LinkedIn post", "draft a presentation", "write a Slack message", "draft sales content", or any content creation request where brand voice should be applied. Also triggers on "on-brand", "brand voice", "enforce voice", "apply brand guidelines", "brand-aligned content", "write in our voice", "use our brand tone", "make this sound like us", "rewrite this in our tone", or "this doesn't sound on-brand". Not for generating guidelines from scratch (use guideline-generation) or discovering brand materials (use discover-brand).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds grant and solicitation opportunities the organization actually qualifies for, runs a hard go/no-go before anyone starts writing, drafts the application or response from past submissions and real program data, and tracks every deadline and reporting obligation that follows an award. Built for nonprofits, government contractors, and education, and it filters daily feeds like SAM.gov or DIBBS down to the handful worth bidding. Runs on Google Drive or M365 with DocuSign and Calendar deepening it, and works from uploaded past submissions plus web research when nothing is connected. Use this whenever a funding or bidding opportunity is in play — including "find grants we qualify for," "should we bid this," "draft the response to this RFP," "we've got 50 solicitations to filter," "what's due on the federal grant," or "help me write the proposal narrative."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic product leadership toolkit for Head of Product covering OKR cascade generation, quarterly planning, competitive landscape analysis, product vision documents, and team scaling proposals. Use when creating quarterly OKR documents, defining product goals or KPIs, building product roadmaps, running competitive analysis, drafting team structure or hiring plans, aligning product strategy across engineering and design, or generating cascaded goal hierarchies from company to team level.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router/index for the 4 business & growth skills bundled in this plugin: customer-success-manager (health scoring, churn risk, expansion), sales-engineer (RFP analysis, competitive matrices, PoC planning), revenue-operations (pipeline, forecast accuracy, GTM efficiency), and contract-and-proposal-writer. Use when a growth/revenue request doesn't obviously match one skill and you need to pick the right one (e.g., 'which accounts are at risk', 'should we bid on this RFP').

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fresh-session RFP and proposal-questionnaire response for {{projectName}}. Parses a new inbound RFP from {{rfp_label}} in Gmail and its attached document in Google Drive, matches each question to our vetted past-answers library and product docs, drafts the full response in a new Google Doc inside {{drafts_folder}}, flags anything it can't answer confidently, and leaves an unsent Gmail draft linking it — holding the completed response for a human to review and submit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolding that helps a writer build a story they already want to tell — fills in structure, hidden wound, theme, and prose from the writer's own material across seven narrative layers, deriving the spine from their notes as proposals they ratify. Bans generic AI patterns; scales short story to multi-book series. USE WHEN write story, fiction, novel, chapter, story bible, character arc, plot outline, creative writing, worldbuilding, draft story, help me write my story, develop my novel, layer my story, build out my book, I have notes for a story. NOT FOR narrative summaries of real content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduces an always-on LifeOS context file that has grown too big via a human-gated pass — deterministic GC of stale entries first, then semantic merges and relocations — never dropping a directive and committing every change reversibly. USE WHEN /trim, trim the context, trim OPERATIONAL_RULES, this file is too big, reduce a doctrine file, prune an always-loaded file, fold the proposal inbox, shrink CLAUDE.md or DA_IDENTITY. NOT FOR general code refactoring, trimming video or audio media (use AudioEditor for audio files), or removing AI writing patterns from prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms product documentation into sales-ready packages — a story explanation, charcoal gestural sketch art, and talking points — via a narrative-arc pipeline. USE WHEN sales, proposal, pitch deck, value proposition, sales narrative, sales deck, sales package, turn this into a pitch, create a sales story, sales materials, product pitch, transform docs to sales, sales script. NOT FOR Hormozi $100M frameworks, value equation, irresistible offer, or VOC mining, standalone diagrams or illustrations (use Art), or platform social posts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover WHICH new skills you should create, from your own work history plus your satisfaction/frustration signals. Read-only and proposal-only: it surfaces recurring pain that no existing skill, loop, or workflow covers, then hands you a ranked shortlist to build with CreateSkill. It never creates or edits a skill itself. Frustration is a first-class signal (a topic can look 'covered' while you keep hitting the same wall inside it), so it reads low ratings and recurrence markers, not just session topics. USE WHEN should I create a skill, what skills do I need, suggest skills, skill gap, based on my recent work, am I missing a skill, what should I build. NOT FOR creating/validating/testing/optimizing an individual skill (use CreateSkill) — this only decides WHAT to build, not how.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Augment a Wren project with business context that DB schema cannot carry — enum value meanings, units (USD vs cents, ms vs sec), NULL semantics, magic sentinels (-1 = unknown), soft-delete default filters, business synonyms, time-grain / TZ conventions, cross-system identifiers, currency rules, canonical-table preferences, AND named aggregation metrics (ARR, churn, DAU, WAU, NRR) proposed as cubes. Runs in one of two modes selected at session start: `grill` (one question at a time, user-driven) or `auto-pilot` (agent infers and applies, escalates only on conflicts and high-blast-radius additions like new cubes / views / relationships). Reads everything under <project>/raw/ (PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, code, data dictionaries) and optionally samples low-cardinality columns from the live DB (grill mode), compares against the current MDL / cubes / knowledge (rules + NL→SQL pairs), then fills gaps via the ten-category gap catalog and the cube proposal flow. Confirmed findings are written back to the right sink. Use when: user says 'enrich context', 'augment my project', 'grill me on this project', 'auto-fill my context', 'agent doesn't understand our docs / enum values / units / null meanings', 'business context is missing', 'what does status=A mean', 'is this amount in USD or cents', 'we keep getting wrong aggregations', 'add cubes for ARR / DAU / churn', 'we have a handbook / glossary / data dictionary the agent should know'; or after generating an MDL and noticing the agent lacks business semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an end-to-end workflow that chains `research-refine` and `experiment-plan`. Use when the user wants a one-shot pipeline from vague research direction to focused final proposal plus detailed experiment roadmap, or asks to "串起来", build a pipeline, do it end-to-end, or generate both the method and experiment plan together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Privileged applier that LANDS meta-optimize / corpus-audit patches the user approved — the ONLY skill permitted to mutate the skill corpus from a self-modification proposal, with cross-model jury and human approval at landing. Use when the user says "meta apply", "/meta-apply", "land the staged patches", "应用优化", after a /meta-optimize run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an OpenShell sandbox returns policy_denied, mentions policy.local, or needs a narrow network policy proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CRM-lite for managing GEO agency prospects and clients. Track leads through the full sales pipeline: Lead → Qualified → Proposal Sent → Won → Lost. Store audit history, notes, deal values, and generate pipeline summaries. Use when user says "prospect", "lead", "client", "pipeline", "crm", "nuovo prospect", "aggiungi cliente", or when managing the business side of GEO services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。