「qa」の検索結果

Verify implementation against QA Contract (G#N, AC#N), auto-invoke debug on RED

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bind loop 'done' to unfakeable gates. Use to harden egregore/herald loops or promote completion_integrity. Not for QA gates; use night-market-validation-and-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn hunches into accepted results: worthiness score, evidence bar, research-to-rules. Use when vetting ideas. Not for QA; use night-market-validation-and-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production QA gate for Blender assets using viewport screenshots, validation checklists, naming audits, and ship/no-ship verdicts via MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在本机 Mac 或 Apple Silicon 上部署 Gemma 4 12B。本地安装/升级 llama.cpp，下载 GGUF 量化模型，用 llama-server 暴露 OpenAI-compatible API，或用 Ollama 暴露本地模型服务；按用户需求在默认 Q4_K_M、64K/128K 长上下文、QAT Q4_0 @ 256K、左右对比演示之间选择，配置 tmux 后台运行，验证健康检查、问答接口、资源占用和常见故障。当用户说部署 Gemma 4、Gemma 4 12B、本地大模型、长上下文、QAT、量化、llama-server、Ollama、GGUF、Mac 本地模型服务时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidated game developer for story execution, code implementation, code review, QA/test authorship, and sprint orchestration. Use when the user asks to talk to Link Freeman, the Game Developer, the Game QA, or the Game Scrum Master.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that code changes are correct, safe, and ready to ship. Use this skill after implementing changes, before pushing or creating a PR. Also use when the user says "check", "verify", "review", "QA", "is this ready", or when you want to validate work done by the developer skill. Runs build, lint, and structural checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Medical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Medical Physicist judgment. Reasons from CTDIvol/SSDE, HU accuracy, ACR/MQSA QA, TG-126 PET/CT, TG-18/TG-270 displays, and NCRP 147 shielding across CT, MRI, mammography, NM/PET, and therapy QA while treating phantom-mismatch dose claims, SUV normalization drift, display washout, and post-upgrade MEE gaps as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to plan, direct, finish, and QA provider-independent mono or stereo 180-degree, 360-degree, spherical, spatial, wide-FOV, and immersive video. It covers format choice, capture rigs, stitching, nadir and seam management, stereoscopic comfort, attention direction, stabilization, ambisonic and spatial audio, titles, captions, accessibility, edit, color, VFX, projection metadata, Vision Pro, YouTube, headset delivery, device QA, and privacy, location, and likeness rights. Do not use it for interactive XR apps, volumetric/world-model generation, game-engine experiences, or provider-specific video generation prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create QA checklists for verifying design implementation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write effective unit tests with Jest, Vitest, or pytest. Covers the test-doubles taxonomy (stub/spy/mock/fake), Arrange-Act-Assert, coverage threshold configuration and CI gating, snapshot testing, fake timers, and mutation testing with Stryker/mutmut. Use when: "unit test," "Jest," "Vitest," "pytest," "mock," "coverage threshold," "test doubles," "mutation testing," "fake timers," "snapshot test." Not for: interpreting coverage reports or finding coverage gaps — use coverage-analysis; AI generating the test code for you — use ai-test-generation; auditing existing tests for smells — use ai-qa-review; browser/component rendering assertions — use cypress-automation or visual-testing. Related: coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, ai-test-generation, shift-left-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runtime per-test healing with evidence: multi-attribute selector healing, environment-aware diagnosis, flake classification, quarantine management, and confidence-scored auto-repair. Goes beyond simple locator fallbacks to cover action-level healing, data healing, and observable repair workflows. Use when: "flaky test," "test stability," "self-healing locator," "broken locator recovery," "unreliable test," "quarantine flaky test." Not for: bulk regenerating selectors after a planned UI refactor — use selector-drift-recovery (this skill heals ONE test at runtime; that one rewrites many tests offline). Not for: classifying/clustering CI failures into bug reports — use ai-bug-triage. Related: playwright-automation, selector-drift-recovery, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test application performance with k6 load/stress/soak/spike scripts and k6 scenarios, Lighthouse CI for Web Vitals, and performance budgets as CI gates. Covers load profiles, custom metrics, bottleneck identification, and Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS). Use when: "performance test," "load test," "stress test," "soak test," "spike test," "k6," "k6 scenarios," "Lighthouse," "Web Vitals," "Core Web Vitals," "performance budget." Not for: scheduled production probes — use synthetic-monitoring; pixel-diff regressions — use visual-testing; designing tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, release-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use production telemetry as INPUT to design new tests. Covers OpenTelemetry integration with tests, trace-based assertions, log-informed test creation, production-error analysis for coverage gaps, and telemetry-driven test prioritization. Use when: "trace-based testing," "design tests from logs," "OpenTelemetry assertions," "production errors point to test gaps," "telemetry-driven testing." Not for: safe rollout techniques (flags, canary) during release — use testing-in-production. Not for: scheduled post-deploy probes — use synthetic-monitoring. Not for: triaging CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: testing-in-production, synthetic-monitoring, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate that analytics and marketing tracking fire CORRECTLY: GA4/GTM dataLayer events, Meta/TikTok/LinkedIn pixels, and ad-tech tags. Covers building a tracking plan as the contract, intercepting collect-endpoint beacons and dataLayer.push in Playwright, asserting event name + params + values + timing + de-duplication, Consent Mode v2 gating, CI regression gating, and news-media events (article-view, scroll-depth, paywall). Use when: "test analytics tracking," "GA4 event test," "verify the pixel fires," "dataLayer test," "tracking plan," "Meta Pixel dedup," "scroll-depth tracking test," "gate tracking in CI." Not for: whether tracking is ALLOWED to fire under consent law (GDPR/CMP) — that is compliance-testing; this skill checks the data is CORRECT. SEO meta tags / structured data — out of scope. Related: compliance-testing, playwright-automation, api-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review EXISTING test code for quality, smells, and testability issues. Detects test smells across six dimensions — readability, reliability, diagnostic value, design, AI-generated, and coverage — analyzes testability of application code, and backs the qualitative smells with mutation testing. Use when: "review my tests," "test quality audit," "test smells," "testability analysis," "are these tests any good." Not for: generating new tests — use `ai-test-generation`. Not for: testing AI features in your product — use `ai-system-testing`. Related: unit-testing, shift-left-testing, coverage-analysis, ai-test-generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate a test suite from one framework to another, incrementally and without losing coverage. Covers Selenium→Playwright, Cypress→Playwright, Jest→Vitest, Mocha→Vitest, and Protractor→Playwright, with parallel CI running, locator/assertion translation, and a coverage-parity track. Use when: "migrate tests," "switch framework," "Selenium to Playwright," "Jest to Vitest," "framework migration." Not for: bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor on the SAME framework — use selector-drift-recovery. Not for: healing one flaky test at runtime — use test-reliability. Not for: modernizing patterns without changing framework — use ai-qa-review. Related: playwright-automation, cypress-automation, unit-testing, ci-cd-integration, test-reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, regex extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing or Litmus). Related: playwright-automation, api-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate release readiness with evidence-based go/no-go decisions. Covers go/no-go checklists, smoke test suite design, staged rollout validation, rollback criteria and procedures, and post-deployment verification. Ensures release confidence comes from data, not feelings. Use when: "release ready," "go/no-go," "smoke test," "release checklist," "rollback plan," "staged rollout," "canary deploy." Not for: safe-release techniques (flags, canary, dark launch) applied during the rollout itself — use testing-in-production; scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring; designing new tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, qa-metrics, ci-cd-integration, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test payment and checkout flows end to end against PSP sandboxes — Stripe first, with the general pattern for Adyen/Braintree/PayPal. Covers Stripe test-mode card numbers and their decline codes, the 3DS/SCA challenge flow and its nested-iframe handling in Playwright, test clocks for subscription/billing-cycle simulation, webhook testing (stripe listen/trigger, signature verification, idempotency), failed/retried payments and refunds, and never using real cards. Use when: "test Stripe checkout," "payment test," "3DS test," "test webhook signature," "test subscription renewal," "test clock," "refund test," "decline card test," "checkout E2E." Not for: General API contract testing of non-payment endpoints — api-testing. PCI-DSS/regulatory compliance audit — compliance-testing. Related: api-testing, playwright-automation, compliance-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full implementation verification pass after code or data changes. Use when the user asks to verify, QA, smoke test, run checks, validate a feature, inspect a local app in the browser, capture screenshots, or turn discovered QA issues into regression tests/checklists with user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。