「requirements」の検索結果

Strictly adheres to specified user flow and game rules, making sure to follow documented features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requirements gathering workflow for specification creation. Use when starting a new feature, task, or project that needs structured requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured interactive questionnaire framework for gathering requirements from users. Uses A/B/C/D/E multiple choice patterns with additive vs exclusive question classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the minimum clarifying questions before implementation when requirements are ambiguous or missing crucial details

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided requirements gathering through structured questions to create comprehensive specifications. Produces a complete requirements document via non-blocking conversational interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a new Tip in the ai-product-dev-tips repository following the existing directory/format conventions, and register its link in the root README.md. Use this whenever the user wants to add, create, or write a new Tip in this repo — e.g. "nlp_processing に〜の Tip を追加して", "新しい Tips を作って", "〜の解説 Tip を書いて", "this repo に〜のネタを追加". It picks the right category and next sequential number, matches the README format of nearby Tips, generates code scaffolding (Dockerfile / requirements.txt / *_cpu.sh / *_gpu.sh / *.py) only when the Tip needs runnable code, and inserts the link into the correct <details> section of the root README. Trigger this even if the user doesn't say the word "skill" — any request to add a new entry to this Tips collection should use it.

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid. Also use for Archify, interactive or animated HTML diagrams, インタラクティブ図, 動く構成図. When an editable .drawio file is required, use the draw.io workflow instead and treat Archify HTML only as a supplement.

Auto-activates during requirements analysis to assess security risks using OWASP Top 10 framework, identify security requirements, and recommend mitigation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Flutter feature Product Requirements Document through a structured clarify-plan-draft workflow. Outputs a PRD using the repository template under `.claude/tasks/<feature-name>/prd.md`. Use when the user says "create a PRD", "write requirements", "define the feature", "start a feature spec", or wants to specify a feature before techspec/tasks/start-job.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert current conversation context into a structured Product Requirements Document (PRD) and optionally post it to GitHub Issues. Use before /supergraph:plan when requirements came from a conversation, user story, or feature discussion rather than a formal spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tend the Allium garden. Use when the user wants to write, edit, update, add to, improve, clarify, refine, restructure, fix or migrate Allium specs. Covers adding entities, rules, triggers, surfaces and contracts, fixing syntax or validation errors, renaming or refactoring within specs, migrating specs to a new language version, and translating requirements into well-formed specifications. Pushes back on vague requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a systems engineer/architect working at the whole-program level — decomposing requirements across hardware/software/network subsystems, writing or reviewing an interface control document (ICD), making a build-vs-buy tradeoff for a subsystem, or tracing a verification failure back through the requirements baseline. Distinct from a software engineer (owns one service's code) or DevOps/SRE (owns operational reliability) — this role owns the technical baseline for a whole system-of-systems and is accountable when subsystems built by different teams or vendors don't fit together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze features from user perspective and write user stories with acceptance criteria. Use when defining requirements, writing user stories, validating scope against project state, prioritizing features by impact, comparing approaches, analyzing user needs, or planning next work. Triggers: "user story", "acceptance criteria", "scope", "prioritize", "compare requirements", "user needs", "what to build next".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Product Requirements Document (PRD) and setup for Ralph autonomous loop. Use when user runs /create-prd command, wants to set up a project for Ralph, mentions "ralph setup", "create prd", "product requirements", or needs to generate tasks for autonomous development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents to interactively discover customer requirements for live, bidirectional multi-agent AI systems that process continuous streams of multimodal data for real-time technical guidance and safety monitoring. Generates a custom Google Cloud solution that uses opinionated best practices and architecture guidance. Use when users need agentic assistance to design and create a multi-product solution in the cloud for live bidirectional multimodal streaming workloads. Don't use for simple text-based chat applications or workloads without real-time streaming requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactively discovers requirements and designs holistic, multi-product system architectures, solution blueprints, and deployment recommendations for complex workloads on Google Cloud. Use when designing end-to-end cloud solutions, selecting and integrating Google Cloud services, generating architecture diagrams, or conducting requirements discovery for new cloud workloads or migrations. Don't use for single-product tasks (use product-specific skills), initial onboarding or authentication (use google-cloud-recipe-*), Well-Architected Framework reviews or audits (use google-cloud-waf-*), or workloads covered by specialized solution skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BA (Business Analyst) agent. Analyzes requirements and produces 4 artifact files: requirements.md, user-stories.md, acceptance-criteria.md, business-rules.md. Use --srs to load from SRS workflow artifacts (spec.md / brainstorm.md). Part of the Virtual Team Skill pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refreshing a RACI (Responsible / Accountable / Consulted / Informed) matrix for a Salesforce project so that every Salesforce-specific decision — data model change, automation tier choice, security model, integration boundary, deployment, license/edition — has exactly one accountable owner and a documented escalation path that downstream agents can route to. Trigger keywords: RACI matrix salesforce project, stakeholder authority salesforce, escalation path salesforce decisions, who approves data model change, salesforce decision rights, REFUSAL_NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW routing. NOT for the change advisory board operating model itself (use admin/change-management-and-deployment). NOT for end-user training rollout plans (use admin/change-management-and-training). NOT for the technical mechanics of permission set assignment authority (use admin/permission-set-architecture). NOT for pure stakeholder requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). More trigger keywords: who approves a sandbox refresh, who signs off a data load, release update activation owner, delegated admin authority vs RACI, multi-org decision rights, escalation time-box.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure and troubleshoot Salesforce Billing revenue recognition rules, schedules, and GL transaction generation under ASC 606. Triggers: 'revenue schedule not generated after order activation', 'blng__RevenueSchedule__c missing', 'blng__RevenueRecognitionRule__c on a product', 'Finance Periods not set up', 'performance obligation allocation for bundled products', 'distribution method', 'ASC 606 in Salesforce Billing'. NOT for billing schedules, invoice plans and invoice runs - use admin/billing-schedule-setup. NOT for invoice-to-payment mismatches at month-end close - use data/billing-data-reconciliation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing or documenting a lead scoring model in Salesforce Sales Cloud or Account Engagement: qualifying criteria, MQL/SQL threshold definitions, scoring dimensions (demographic, firmographic, behavioral), and sales handoff SLA. NOT for configuring the scoring, grading, and automation rules in Account Engagement — use admin/mcae-lead-scoring-and-grading. NOT for the whole marketing program's lifecycle stages and platform scope — use admin/marketing-automation-requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requirements mapping for the full donor lifecycle in NPSP or Nonprofit Cloud: acquisition stage design, moves management, upgrade paths, lapsed donor re-engagement, and portfolio segmentation. NOT for mapping the Opportunity sales processes and stage picklists — use admin/fundraising-process-mapping. NOT for stewardship task automation — use admin/npsp-engagement-plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when gathering or evaluating requirements for a Salesforce Commerce Cloud digital storefront — branding strategy, content management approach, personalization, mobile experience, and accessibility compliance. Trigger keywords: SFRA branding, PWA Kit storefront, composable storefront, storefront accessibility, WCAG Commerce Cloud, overlay cartridge branding, mobile storefront, storefront personalization, content slots. NOT for building the site in Business Manager — use admin/b2c-commerce-store-setup. NOT for SCAPI design, Managed Runtime and caching strategy — use architect/headless-commerce-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when defining AI governance policies, designing human oversight workflows, documenting bias mitigation strategies, or meeting regulatory transparency requirements for Salesforce AI features. Trigger keywords: responsible AI, AI bias, AI audit trail, AI transparency, human-in-the-loop, AI risk inventory, AI disclosure. NOT for the MLOps pipeline or Policy-as-Code engine architecture — use architect/ai-governance-architecture. NOT for Trust Layer technical configuration — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。