「verdict」の検索結果

Diagnoses and fixes skills in the dotnet/skills repository that lose to their own baseline, fail to activate, time out, or return "no credible improvement". Use when an evaluation verdict is a regression or underpowered, when a skill regressed after a change, when /evaluate reports no results, or when deciding whether a weak skill should be strengthened or retired. Do not use for scaffolding a brand-new skill (use create-skill) or a brand-new eval (use create-skill-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own MSBuild import and hook discovery. USE FOR: CustomBefore/CustomAfter hooks, ordered wildcard and NuGet auto-imports, control properties, build/buildTransitive packed layout, package ID and file-name matching, per-TFM forwarders, and tracing why assets or hooks are missing, broken, or replaced. An import guard remains in scope when it is one defect in a broader hook/import flow. DO NOT USE for a focused safety verdict on whether one specific Import needs Exists or is an intentionally unguarded package contract; use msbuild-antipatterns. NEVER INVOKE when imports and hook placement already work and the request is only target Inputs/Outputs, incremental skipping, or FileWrites clean tracking; use incremental-build or target-authoring. Exclude props-versus-targets placement and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Running a team of subagents on one design build: clone briefs, disjoint file ownership, isolated builds, the evidence packet, review lenses, the fix plan, verdicts, cold eyes and the stop rule, with the workflow templates bunshin runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summon shadow clones: genjutsu's full-scale pipeline for a whole website or web app, from scratch or as a full redesign. Harvests the client's real material, researches in parallel, lets Impeccable lead the direction and genjutsu the motion, builds the pages with parallel agents, then loops fixes, verdicts and a cold-eyes art director until only minor issues remain, the round cap of the chosen tier is reached, or a round fixes nothing. Announces its cost first and asks twice. Web. Needs a host that can spawn subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate a caller-selected Gas City 1.4 with upstream registry packs and native run-centered surfaces while keeping GC runtime state out of AgentOps verdicts. Triggers: "using gc", "gas city", "drive the mayor", "dispatch through gc".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Freshly judge whether a finished change and its claims meet original acceptance: PASS, FAIL or NOT_PROVEN. Use when: asked for a go/no-go, sign-off or independent verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Freshly judge exact subject content against bead or caller acceptance, optionally persist verdict.v2 for a declared consumer, and stop. Triggers: "validate", "independently validate", "vibe".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a product strategy and stress-tests your moat, then writes a one-page strategy doc (diagnosis, where to play, how to win, guiding policy, coherent actions, moat verdicts). Use for 'we need a product strategy', 'is our moat real', 'do we have a competitive advantage', 'where should we play', 'defensibility', 'should we expand into X', 'our roadmap has no strategy', or 'write a product vision'. Draws on 909 insights from 236 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Roger Martin, Richard Rumelt and Hamilton Helmer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a career question into a decision brief the PM can act on this week - a career plan, a promotion case, a stay-or-leave verdict, a job-search system, or an offer-negotiation script. Use when someone says 'how do I get promoted', 'should I leave my job', 'job search', 'I got laid off', 'negotiate my offer', 'career plan', 'IC or manager', 'next role', 'am I stuck', 'how do I stay relevant with AI' or 'how do I break into PM'. Draws on 188 Lenny's Podcast guests including Phyl Terry, Nikhyl Singhal and Deb Liu.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which AI features to build, delay, shelve or kill, and whether each one gets better as models improve. Produces an AI Bet Memo (feature-by-feature verdicts, retest triggers, scaffolding ledger, moat and safety check) from a roadmap or idea list. Use for 'AI strategy', 'AI roadmap', 'what should we build with AI', 'will the next model make this obsolete', 'build vs wait for the model', 'will OpenAI/Anthropic build this', 'agent or chatbot', 'is this feature worth shipping'. Draws on 118 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Nick Turley, Kevin Weil and Dianne Penn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses product-market fit from survey, usage and pipeline data and returns a scored verdict with the next moves. Use when you ask 'do we have product-market fit', 'is our PMF survey good enough', 'what does 35% very disappointed mean', 'should we scale yet', 'why is growth stalling', or need a Sean Ellis survey, retention check, or PMF level read. Draws on 137 insights from 66 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Sean Ellis, Todd Jackson and Rahul Vohra.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to "apply findings", "apply fixes", "apply suggestions", "apply accepted findings", "fix the findings", or "apply the review results".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stand up the project's live app and hand it to the user to try a change firsthand, then act on their verdict once they reply. Use when the user asks to "preview the change", "let me try it", "spin up the app so I can test it", "set it up so I can poke at it", or before finalizing a UI/UX change that needs human eyes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-ship gate — runs detector, verifies brief and tokens, applies the 10-pass finish bar, ranks findings by feedback hierarchy. Use when the user wants to ship, merge, or finalize a surface and needs a verdict (READY / NOT READY / BLOCKED) before committing. Invoke when the user asks for finalize on their UI, or mentions 'finalize' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the user asks to 'review and address in a loop', 'iterate review until approved', 'auto review-and-fix this PR', 'loop /ocr:review and /ocr:address', or to take a changeset all the way to a clean APPROVE with the default reviewer team. Wraps the /ocr:review (.ocr/commands/review.md) and /ocr:address (.ocr/commands/address.md) skills; needs a feature branch with an open GitHub PR and the gh CLI for posting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take any claim and design + execute a complete research protocol to test it. Apply scientific method automatically: design study, gather data, run analysis, provide verdict with confidence level.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via acc_act(runtime="outcome").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production QA gate for Blender assets using viewport screenshots, validation checklists, naming audits, and ship/no-ship verdicts via MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read remaining Claude Code and Codex subscription quota without spending it. Use when the user asks or after a vendor rejects work for quota; a caller such as rotate-agent may also arm a scheduled read on purpose. Never poll on your own; after a `wait` verdict, pass the reset wait to `sno heartbeat` and re-read once when it ends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate the `sno` command-line tool: install, update, check, and uninstall Sno products, read the exact commands and flags of the installed version, and run the account, skills, onboarding, Station telemetry and REM commands. Use when the owner or a task says "sno", "Sno CLI", "sno setup", "sno update", "sno doctor", "sno uninstall", "sno station", "telemetry consent", "rem verdict", "sno account", or "sno skills". The exact flags always come from the installed binary, never from this file. Do not use it to decide the owner's choices for them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a self-contained, beautifully styled HTML analysis of an academic paper. Use when the user provides an arXiv link, paper URL, PDF, or asks to analyze a research paper. Produces a standalone HTML file with structured sections (Problem, Translation/Analogy, Architecture, Key Results, Verdict), embedded figures, and responsive design. Trigger words include 读论文, 分析论文, paper analysis, paper review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。