2,671 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Read-only repository explorer. Use PROACTIVELY for cold-start exploration, broad cross-file localization, or when a direct search has failed and you need to find where something lives. Skip it when the issue already names the exact file or symbol, or a previous turn already returned usable file:line evidence. Returns only compact path:line citations; its reads and greps never enter the main conversation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when designing the human-executable UAT test cases that prove a Salesforce feature works for a specific persona — the per-persona scripts with preconditions, data setup, permission setup, ordered steps, and pass/fail evidence that close out an RTM row. Trigger keywords: UAT test case salesforce, user acceptance test script salesforce, manual test salesforce feature, UAT script per persona, UAT precondition data setup, UAT permission set assignment for testing, negative path UAT case. NOT for high-level UAT planning, defect classification, regression strategy, or sign-off (use admin/uat-and-acceptance-criteria). NOT for the Given/When/Then technique used to write the AC the case is derived from (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for Apex test method generation (use agents/test-class-generator). NOT for test data factory patterns (use templates/apex/tests/TestDataFactory.cls). NOT for performance or load testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore and debate options with fresh documentation and research before committing. Use when facing a real decision with multiple plausible approaches — library/framework choice, architecture call, API or schema design, algorithm selection, or any communication / strategy call where being wrong has cost. Enumerates relevant research domains, looks up current docs and evidence-based methods, weighs options on correctness and elegance, resists bloat. Do NOT use for divergent ideation (brainstorm), extracting user intent (elicit), or reviewing already-written code (quality-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve an existing agent SKILL.md through one gated cycle: select the target (default this skill), snapshot the committed baseline, diagnose against skill-design-principles plus four rubric dimensions, apply exactly one focused change, and ship only if a different agent than the author PASSes with quoted evidence. Use when the user says "improve this skill", "improve-skill", "iterate on SKILL.md", or "apply skill-design-principles to a skill". Do not use for code slop over a duration (anneal), generic timeboxed work (timeboxed-iterating), graph orchestration (workgraph), metric hill-climb on a codebase (autoresearch), or stripping slop from existing prose (catalog-deslop).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically explore and test any software project (CLI, API, Backend, Library, etc.) to find bugs, usability issues, and edge cases. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence (exact commands, inputs, logs, and tracebacks) for every issue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate any URL, interact with elements, verify page state, diff before/after actions, take annotated screenshots, check responsive layouts, test forms and uploads, handle dialogs, and assert element states. ~100ms per command. Use when you need to test a feature, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate any URL, interact with elements, verify page state, diff before/after actions, take annotated screenshots, check responsive layouts, test forms and uploads, handle dialogs, and assert element states. ~100ms per command. Use when you need to test a feature, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4-phase systematic debugging methodology with root cause analysis and evidence-based verification. Use when debugging complex issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Goal-like loop that uses ultrawork mode to decompose work into systematic, evidence-bound steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a Prometheus work plan in Codex with Boulder state, evidence ledger updates, worktree discipline, parallel subagents, and Stop-hook continuation. Use after planning when the user says start work, execute plan, continue plan, resume plan, or asks to run a .omo/plans plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-pass strategic-orientation review of a repository. Produces an evidence-cited map (not a grade) calibrated to a reference class, helping the user decide where to engage, where to tread carefully, and where to leave alone. Advisory only — no changes made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a political science pre-submission audit with journal-aware personas, stage-aware standards, and evidence-grounded issue reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first mailbox triage, drafting, send verification, and sent-mail-safe follow-up workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to organize email, draft or send through the real mail surface, or prove what landed in Sent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first revenue, pricing, refunds, team-billing, and billing-model truth workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a sales snapshot, pricing comparison, duplicate-charge diagnosis, or code-backed billing reality instead of generic payments advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first ECC Tools burn and billing audit workflow. Use when investigating runaway PR creation, quota bypass, premium-model leakage, duplicate jobs, or GitHub App cost spikes in the ECC Tools repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop an independent visual language and turn the human-chosen direction into a production-ready graphic, brand, campaign, publication, web, or product system. Use when originality and differentiation matter enough to escape generic AI and Big Tech aesthetics. Guides a minimum-evidence start, ten isolated typography-led HTML design directions made only from type, color, and space, visual-first human judgement, explicit commitment, and concrete Round 2 production. Do not use for routine UI fixes, small components, or applying an existing design system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。