4,804 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write Unity 6.3 LTS C# gameplay scripts: the MonoBehaviour lifecycle (Awake/OnEnable/Start/Update/FixedUpdate/LateUpdate), GameObject and component access, coroutines, and Inspector serialization. Use when creating or editing .cs scripts in a Unity project, or when the user mentions MonoBehaviour, Start/Update, GetComponent, SerializeField, coroutines, or "Unity script".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a Godot 4.7 project with the scene tree and node composition: build reusable scenes, instance PackedScenes at runtime, navigate the tree safely, and register autoload singletons. Use when designing .tscn scenes, deciding how to split nodes, spawning instances with instantiate(), wiring autoloads, or fixing "node not found"/freed-node errors in a Godot project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement 2D kinematic character movement in Godot 4.7 with CharacterBody2D and move_and_slide(): platformer run/jump with gravity, top-down 8-direction motion, slope handling, and reading collisions. Use when coding a 2D player or enemy controller, a platformer or top-down character, or fixing move_and_slide()/ is_on_floor() behavior in a .tscn with a CharacterBody2D.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies proven testing patterns — Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA), Given-When-Then, Test Data Builders, Object Mother, parameterized tests, fixtures, spies, and test doubles — to help write maintainable, reliable, and readable test suites. Use when the user asks about writing unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests; structuring test cases or test suites; applying TDD or BDD practices; working with mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes; improving test coverage or reducing flakiness; or needs guidance on test organization, naming conventions, or assertions in frameworks like Jest, Vitest, pytest, or similar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit Git configuration with one read-only baseline command, then propose confirmed, non-destructive fixes for identity, editor, and diff and merge tooling, with signing and safe.directory help only on request. Use when setting up or checking Git on a workstation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .codex/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build the visual layer of a long-form talking-head video as one persistent world the camera moves through, instead of a sequence of separate graphics. Use when asked to edit a video, add motion graphics, design the visuals for a script, plan an edit, or fix an edit judged confusing, text-heavy, hard to follow, or "clearly made by an AI". Covers the persistent world, camera grammar, the spotlight rule, spatial open loops, ornament and token discipline, transcript timing, and the verification gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run /test to write a test suite for code you just built or changed, after implementing a feature, route, or fix. Targets uncommitted changes automatically, reads test preferences.json for your framework (asks and saves it if absent), and picks the right strategy per file: happy path, edge cases, error states, accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose or directly apply edits to Arkon wiki pages, including proposing brand new pages. Contributors create drafts for review; editors/admins can edit/create directly. Triggers on: update wiki, fix this page, propose edit, edit wiki page, correct the KB, improve wiki, resubmit my draft, withdraw my draft, create new wiki page, propose new page.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and ships iOS/macOS apps with XcodeGen, SwiftUI and SPM: Xcode build fixes, device deployment, Apple Developer signing/notarization, CI/CD pipelines. Use for XcodeGen project.yml setup, "Library not loaded @rpath" crashes, code-signing errors (Error -25294, adhoc fallback), or Electron notarization failures. Not for TCC permission dialogs (use macos-permissions) or disk cleanup (use macos-cleaner).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Only for explicit prior-work/reuse/history requests, not status checks. Finds and verifies existing work before new production when reuse is plausible. Use when the user explicitly references earlier work, existing code, history, or prior decisions, or says 以前做过, 已有代码, 别重复造轮子. Not for current tests, files, bug fixes, or mechanical verification. Produces a reuse/adapt/reject receipt; zero hits never prove absence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes, tests, registers and debugs Claude Code hooks (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, SessionStart, Stop) that turn a rule the model keeps breaking into a hard gate. Use when the user wants to block or intercept a tool call, add a guard rail, fix a misfiring hook, or says 拦截 / 守卫 / 钩子 — including "make it stop doing X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts DOCX/PDF/PPTX and saved HTML/HTM to high-quality Markdown with automatic post-processing. Fixes pandoc grid tables, simple tables, image paths, CJK bold spacing, attribute noise, and code blocks; for PDFs also strips OCR garbage blocks, repeated headers/footers/watermarks, and absolute image paths from pymupdf4llm output. Benchmarked best-in-class (7.6/10) against Docling, MarkItDown, Pandoc raw, and Mammoth. Trigger on "convert document", "docx to markdown", "parse word", "doc to markdown", "解析word", "转换文档", "HTML to Markdown".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Installs, configures, customizes, or troubleshoots the Claude Code statusline (cwd, model, token counts). Use when the user wants to set up or change the statusline, switch minimal vs full layouts, show absolute token counts instead of a percentage, add cost via ccusage, or fix a statusline that is blank, silent, stuck, or stopped updating. Trigger phrases: 状态栏, 状态栏不显示, 状态栏空白, "statusline blank", "statusline broken".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fixes web search on an agent whose model backend can't run it: a relay/reseller proxying Claude or Codex returns empty instead of failing. Use when web search returns nothing, a model insists a shipped product doesn't exist, someone wants to give an agent internet access, or the user is on a third-party base URL, relay, or 中转站. Diagnoses which built-in tools are dead, removes them, and installs a working replacement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Switches or repairs an OpenClaw instance's model config: changes the default model, adds model definitions, and fixes 401 "Invalid token", "No available channel / model not found", "Thinking level X is not supported", or a config edit that doesn't take effect. Use for 切换模型/换模型/升级模型 or 模型配的错了. Not for plain config audits (use openclaw).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ships pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size/scope checks, minimal-diff implementation, AI-disclosure PR descriptions, and rebase or bot-review replies. Use for 提 PR / 上游 PR / 贡献代码, "open a PR", "fix this upstream", "rebase against main", "respond to the bot review". Not for reviewing PRs as maintainer (use github-review-pr) or general GitHub CRUD (use github-ops).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handle a dispute with a contractor — unfinished work, poor quality, overcharging, or a no-show — with a path that protects your money and your options. Use when asked to deal with a contractor dispute, my contractor did bad work / won't finish / overcharged, or how to get a builder to fix their work. Produces a read on your position (contract, payments, evidence), a firm-but-professional communication and demand path, documentation and payment-leverage guidance, and escalation options (mediation, licensing board, chargeback, small claims) — flagging that it's not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review what an LLM feature or agent actually puts in its context window — and find what's bloating, missing, or fighting itself. Use when asked to review a system prompt and context assembly, cut token usage without losing quality, debug an agent that ignores instructions, or audit how retrieval results, history, and tool definitions are packed into the window. Produces a context inventory with a keep/cut/restructure verdict per component, ordering and caching fixes, and a token budget. For wording-level prompt tuning use prompt-optimizer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep citations honest in business documents — every load-bearing claim sourced, links that actually contain the claim, the as-of dates that keep numbers honest, and the internal-vs-external sourcing rules for decks and memos. Use when asked check the sourcing in this deck, add citations to this doc, our slide says 'studies show' — which studies, or set citation norms for the team. Produces the claim-by-claim audit, the fixes (source found, claim softened, or cut), the citation format for the venue, and the team norm card.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。