「quality」の検索結果

Expert guide for property-based testing (fast-check, Hypothesis) and mutation testing (Stryker, mutmut) — AI-generated test properties, invariant discovery, mutation score optimization, and test suite quality verification / Panduan ahli property-based testing (fast-check, Hypothesis) dan mutation testing (Stryker, mutmut) — properti tes yang dihasilkan AI, penemuan invarian, optimasi skor mutasi, dan verifikasi kualitas suite tes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for Biome (Rust-based linter + formatter), ESLint/Prettier migration, and code quality tooling / Panduan ahli Biome (linter + formatter berbasis Rust), migrasi dari ESLint/Prettier, dan tooling kualitas kode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve a Hinge dating profile through research-backed screenshot audits, photo selection and ordering, conversational discovery, prompt and caption writing, settings review, or post-launch troubleshooting. Use for a full profile rebuild or a focused request about photos, copy, positioning, match quality, or profile performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Ultimate Bug Scanner (UBS) for code review. Use when reviewing code, checking for bugs, scanning for security issues, validating AI-generated code, or pre-commit quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates publication-quality academic figures (framework diagrams, pipeline illustrations, system architectures, method overviews) from a paper's method text and a target caption, using a local PaperBanana multi-agent pipeline (Retriever → Planner → Stylist → Visualizer → Critic).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Birding by sight and sound — gestalt, song and call vocabulary, behavioral and habitat clues, and the discipline of producing eBird-grade records. Covers the vocabulary of bird field marks, the primary categories of vocalization, the habits of habitat-filtering, and the protocol for submitting records to a citizen-science database without degrading data quality. Use when the task is bird-specific observation or record-keeping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translation and interpretation as language meta-skills -- equivalence theory (Nida's formal vs. dynamic equivalence), translation strategies (borrowing, calque, transposition, modulation, adaptation), interpretation modes (simultaneous, consecutive, sight), source text analysis, register preservation, cultural adaptation, untranslatability and compensatory strategies, machine translation literacy, and back-translation for verification. Covers literary, technical, legal, and community interpreting contexts. Use when translating between languages, evaluating translation quality, teaching translation skills, or understanding the limits of cross-linguistic transfer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Historical argumentation, evidence-based writing, and oral history methods. Covers thesis development for historical arguments, evidence selection and deployment, counterargument construction and rebuttal, historical writing conventions, and the methodology of oral history as both source and practice. Use when constructing historical arguments, writing analytical essays, conducting oral history interviews, or assessing the quality of historical writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grammar of graphics, chart type selection, color theory, interactive visualization, dashboards, and the principles of honest, effective data display. Covers Tufte's data-ink ratio, Bertin's visual variables, perceptual principles, accessibility, small multiples, annotation, and the full workflow from exploratory plots to publication-quality graphics. Use when creating charts, designing dashboards, critiquing visualizations, or choosing how to display data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operations management and lean production techniques for turning inputs into outputs under variability. Covers the Toyota Production System, seven wastes, just-in-time, kanban, jidoka, single-minute die exchange, 5 Whys, value stream mapping, bottleneck theory, and the distinction between mass production and flexible production. Use when diagnosing operational waste, designing production flows, setting up quality systems, or comparing batch-and-queue to one-piece flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before dispatching a multi-agent team, run a spectral diagnostic on the proposed communication graph and emit a (ρ, Δ, κ) coordination signature plus a pass/fail verdict against per-task-class thresholds. Builds the row-stochastic operator P from the team graph, computes the successor representation M = (I − γP)⁻¹, and ranks the topology for robustness (κ, condition number), consensus (Δ, spectral gap), and drift (ρ, spectral radius). Per Parks & Alharthi (arxiv 2605.11453), rank order on (κ, Δ, ρ) predicts coordination quality pre-execution with rank correlations of 1.0 / 0.5 / −1.0. Triggers: "dispatch the team", "team topology check", "before running the agents", "is this team configuration OK", "team pre-flight".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews code for bugs, style, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs or checking code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run ship-safe security and quality audit on the current project. Executes npx ship-safe audit . and reports findings by severity. Use before shipping any feature or PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the task involves `build web components`, `create frontend interface`, `build web page`, `build web application`, `frontend design`, `create UI component`, or `design web interface`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code refactoring patterns and techniques for improving code quality without changing behavior. Use for cleaning up legacy code, reducing complexity, or improving maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides agent selection criteria, workflow patterns (TDD, feature addition, code review, refactoring, debugging), quality gates, and python-cli-architect vs stdlib-scripting routing for Python engineering tasks. Activated by python-engineering:orchestrate at Step 1 before any task is routed. Also activates when an orchestrator needs to select the correct Python specialist agent or chain agents across a multi-step Python workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review pytest test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant faults, behavior-preserving refactors, realistic boundaries, isolation, and diagnostics. Use for test-quality audits, coverage-gap reviews, regression-test changes, or mocking reviews; preserve existing project gates rather than inventing coverage targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and improve processes or systems using an explicit semantic model, adaptive instruction resolution, evidence-driven change, and claim-level validation. Use when reviewing process quality, resolving ambiguity or gaps, deciding how much procedural detail is necessary, or validating consequential process behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when checking skill quality, validating frontmatter before commit, or diagnosing validator warnings. Runs the plugin validator on a skill, agent, or plugin directory — reports token complexity, broken links, frontmatter issues, and structural problems. Pass the path as an argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis criteria, transformation patterns, output format, and validation checklist for refactoring Claude Code agent prompt files. Load this skill when preparing to run the subagent-refactorer agent or when reviewing agent prompt files for structural, model optimization, or instruction quality improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility route for existing callers that supply files/scope or quality-gate evidence and need diagnosis and resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare explicit design/specification contracts with the implementation in a defined change scope. Use to verify signatures, types, schemas, invariants, and other stated contracts without expanding into general code quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。