「implementation」の検索結果

Use when a problem requires structured step-by-step reasoning before acting. Prevents jumping to conclusions or guessing root causes without evidence. Triggers on complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis verification, or when mk:fix invokes diagnosis phase. NOT for being stuck on approach (too many implementations, forced assumptions, innovation block) — use mk:problem-solving instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates single-task implementation pipeline: plan → test → build → review. Shipping is an explicit follow-up. Use for feature work, plan execution, or fixes scoped to a single task. NOT for green-field product builds (see mk:autobuild); NOT for auto-invoked workflow orchestration (see mk:workflow-orchestrator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing UI components, reviewing visual design, building design systems, or checking accessibility. Auto-activates on frontend design tasks and UI reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing features or writing code. TDD enforcement is opt-in via --tdd / MEOWKIT_TDD=1. Provides code patterns, skill loading, and coding standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-flight security analysis before code changes — identifies trust boundary risks, dangerous patterns, and provides proceed/caution/block advisory before implementation starts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-validated planning — research → plan → verify cycle for high-confidence implementation plans

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes development tasks to the correct language or framework expert agent. Use when user requests code review, implementation, refactoring, or debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a LiveAvatar integration end-to-end — assesses the user's existing stack, recommends the optimal path, and guides implementation. Use when: (1) Building a new LiveAvatar integration, (2) Adding a real-time avatar to an app or site, (3) Connecting LiveAvatar to an existing AI pipeline, (4) User mentions LiveAvatar, real-time avatar, interactive avatar, conversational avatar, or lip-sync avatar, (5) Deciding between Embed, FULL Mode, and LITE Mode, (6) Migrating from HeyGen Interactive Avatar to LiveAvatar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect a declared React Native or Expo feature slice and produce a read-only SwiftUI behavioral parity contract before any implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish, author, restructure, or audit human-first processor Architecture, Design, Research, Review, and Verification documentation. Use for progressive documentation scaffolding, authority maps, reading paths, document-type content contracts, length-budgeted splitting, or maintainability reviews. Do not use as a substitute for cycle-accurate microarchitecture analysis or RTL implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop, challenge, and document Chisel processor microarchitecture designs before implementation. Use when discussing or writing design documents for processor pipelines, queues, issue logic, rename, ROB, LSU, caches, MSHRs, forwarding, wakeup, replay, flush, privilege, exceptions, or other cycle-accurate hardware mechanisms; when converting design conversations into stable Markdown specifications; or when reviewing a proposed Chisel CPU design for correctness, timing, area, verification cost, and cross-document consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and optimize timing-critical Chisel RTL for FPGA implementation while preserving cycle semantics. Use for Vivado timing bottlenecks, long ready or admission paths, queue and issue selection, free-list bank mapping, priority encoders, one-hot arbitration, wide muxes, late-arriving forwarding or override data, high-fanout controls, cross-module predicates, register-boundary changes, emitted-Verilog inspection, or routed-DCP A/B analysis. Also use when a source-level simplification needs proof that it changes timing without changing architectural state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a prototype against its original design direction and requirements before shipping. Compares implementation to the mockup/spec/context, flags drift in layout, spacing, type, color, states, and behavior, and reports a pass/fix list. Use when the user says "design QA", "does it match the design", "check against the spec", "conformance check", or before sharing/handing off a prototype. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for visual comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use at the START of every task, before writing any code, running tests, debugging, reviewing, or designing. This skill determines which methodology and domain skills must be invoked. MUST be invoked before any implementation, debugging, review, testing, or specification work begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bridge Codex to web-based AI model products by packaging local task context, scrub-checking it, sending it through an approved browser surface to ChatGPT Pro, Claude, Grok, Gemini, or another web model, waiting for the answer, and returning the model response to the user or Codex. Also guide DevSpace-like MCP Connector Mode when the user wants ChatGPT Pro or another MCP-capable web host to access approved local workspaces without relying on Codex browser automation. Use when the user asks for GPT Pro, ChatGPT Pro, Claude web, Grok, Gemini web, web model bridge, external model consult, ask another model, second opinion, use a web AI model, browserless agent access to GPT Pro, MCP connector, DevSpace-like workflow, or send local repo context to a browser-based model for planning, review, debugging, architecture discussion, or implementation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pragmatic testing guidance focused on confidence, behavior over implementation details, and integration-first coverage. Use when designing a test strategy, writing or reviewing tests, reducing brittle mocks, or deciding what is worth testing in an application or library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。