3,996 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive PET selection guide covering differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computation, federated learning, zero-knowledge proofs, and trusted execution environments. Includes use-case matching matrix, performance comparison, and GDPR alignment assessment for each technology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build privacy KPI dashboards tracking DSAR volume and response time, breach count and severity, DPIA completion rate, training coverage, and consent rates. Includes metric definitions, data collection patterns, visualization designs, and executive reporting templates for privacy program measurement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes breach notification under HIPAA Breach Notification Rule (45 CFR 164.400-414). Covers 60-day individual notification, HHS/OCR reporting for breaches of 500+ individuals (immediate) and under 500 (annual log), state attorney general notification, media notification for 500+ in a single state, and breach risk assessment using the four-factor test. Keywords: HIPAA, breach notification, PHI, HHS, OCR, covered entity, business associate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides internal privacy audit program design and execution including risk-based audit planning, scope definition, fieldwork procedures, finding classification, evidence gathering, remediation tracking, and management reporting. Covers audit universe definition, annual audit plan, working papers, and closure verification. Keywords: internal audit, privacy audit, fieldwork, remediation, findings, audit plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes GDPR Article 20 data portability requests, covering machine-readable format requirements (JSON, CSV, XML), direct controller-to-controller transfer mechanisms, and scope limitations to data provided by the subject on consent or contract basis. Activate for portability, data export, Art. 20, data transfer queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and executes tabletop breach simulation exercises for testing organizational breach response capabilities. Covers scenario creation with realistic inject timelines, participant role assignment, communication testing across internal and external channels, decision-point evaluation, and after-action report generation. Keywords: tabletop exercise, breach simulation, incident response testing, scenario design, after-action report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes breach notification under California Civil Code Section 1798.82 (California data breach notification law). Covers data elements triggering notification, timing requirements (most expedient time possible), AG notification for 500+ California residents, specific content and format requirements, and substitute notice provisions. Keywords: California, breach notification, Cal. Civ. Code 1798.82, attorney general, CCPA, data elements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages coordinated breach notification across multiple legal jurisdictions including EU member states (72-hour GDPR deadline), US state breach notification laws (varying timelines from 30 to 90 days), and other international regimes. Covers conflict resolution when notification timelines differ, lead supervisory authority determination, and parallel notification execution. Keywords: multi-jurisdiction, cross-border breach, notification coordination, GDPR, US state laws, international breach notification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes the GDPR Article 33 mandatory breach notification to the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach. Covers required notification content, deadline calculation, risk assessment for notification threshold, and DPO involvement. Keywords: GDPR, Article 33, breach notification, 72 hours, supervisory authority, DPO, EDPB.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Restructure existing code without changing its behavior, through a test-gated refactoring loop: a named target, a green suite over that target before any edit, a planned sequence of small named refactorings, and the full suite re-run after every step. Use when the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, simplify, or improve the design of existing code, or to apply refactoring recommendations from a code-review or architectural-analysis report. This skill changes code; it does not review code (use code-review), assess architecture (use architectural-analysis), plan a multi-module restructure before executing it (use plan-a-change), map domain boundaries before restructuring along them (use ddd-analysis), or build new behavior test-first (use tdd). Do not use it on code inside an active tdd loop; the refactor step of tdd owns that cleanup. Runs its planned sequence to completion without pausing for review; to review each named refactoring as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a plain-language stakeholder summary from an existing feature specification, for sharing with non-technical stakeholders before implementation kicks off. Use when the user wants to draft a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary of a feature spec or PRD. Does not write the spec itself — use plan-a-feature. Does not sequence the build into phases — use plan-a-phased-build. Does not produce an implementation plan — use plan-implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control a running TouchDesigner instance via twozero MCP — create operators, set parameters, wire connections, execute Python, build real-time visuals. 36 native tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bulk grading workflows for Canvas LMS assignments using rubrics. Covers single grading, batch grading, and code execution strategies with safety-first dry runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create original short videos using the 计划对照｜固定分镜条见证执行升级 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coordinating complex tasks across multiple AI agents with a centralized handoff document for planning, execution tracking, and feedback fusion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Threat-model product features, APIs, data flows, secrets, permissions, supply-chain changes, auth boundaries, and risky code paths before or during implementation. Use when touching authentication, authorization, payments, secrets, user data, uploads, webhooks, admin tools, innerHTML/eval/exec, dependency upgrades, or cross-tenant access.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route full software-development architecture work from product intent through design, implementation, testing, release, and operations. Use when the user asks for a complete development architecture, wants to know which Spellbook skills to combine, needs an execution path across PRD/spec/API/data/security/performance/release/SRE, or asks to turn an idea or repo into a production-ready engineering plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagram design reference library (14 types — architecture, flowchart, sequence, state, ER, timeline, swimlane, quadrant, nested, tree, org chart, layers, venn, pyramid). In ppt-master this is consumed by the Executor when hand-authoring diagram-type SVG pages — it is NOT a standalone HTML generator here. Read for deep per-type layout conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, principles, and mental models of Sebastian Thrun (robotics and self-driving cars pioneer, founder of Google X, Waymo, Udacity, Stanford University). Reach for this skill whenever Claude is asked to advise on hardware/software systems engineering, autonomous vehicles, moonshot ideation, probabilistic robotics (SLAM), or leading high-stakes engineering teams. Trigger this skill for discussions on democratizing education, regulating AI, transitioning from academic research to product development, or managing technical teams with empathy. Use it to shift focus from incremental component debates to end-to-end execution and audacious goals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute technical product launches for developer tools, APIs, and technical products. Use this skill when technical PMMs need to "plan a launch", "create a launch strategy", "coordinate a product release", or "prepare for GA/beta launch".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute effective sprints using Agile methodologies. Define sprint goals, estimate user stories, manage sprint backlog, and facilitate daily standups to maximize team productivity and deliver value incrementally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master prioritization frameworks, roadmap planning, timeline estimation, and resource allocation. Create executable roadmaps that drive focus and alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。