3,388 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
AI-First SDLC compliance rules and standards. Use when checking code quality, validating architecture, enforcing zero technical debt, or making any compliance decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the SDLC validation pipeline using direct tool invocations. No wrapper scripts required. Use when checking code quality before commits or PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape web pages to clean markdown using Firecrawl v2 — handles JS-heavy pages, site crawls, URL mapping, document parsing (PDF/DOCX/XLSX), LLM-powered extraction, autonomous agent scraping, and post-scrape browser interaction (Interact API). Free keyless mode available for search/scrape/parse/interact (no API key needed). Prefer over WebFetch for quality and completeness. Triggers on scrape URL, fetch page, crawl site, extract content, parse document, web to markdown, DeepWiki, Firecrawl.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, responsive design, theming, and anti-patterns. Generate a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings. Report-only — documents issues for other skills to fix. Triggers on audit the design, check accessibility, technical review, performance audit, a11y check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, interaction states, and micro-details before shipping. Executes changes (unlike design-audit and design-critique which are report-only). Triggers on polish, finishing touches, final pass, something looks off, pre-launch, good to great.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent Brain /brain-eval: changing Agent Brain behavior or checking quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes Claude Project context budget under the automatic-RAG-by-window model: knowledge files vs. threshold-exempt overhead (Skills, MCPs, CI, Memory). Two modes: Quick Diagnostic and Full Budget Audit. Use when user says "check my context budget," "how much context am I using," "is my project too big," "optimize my token usage," "tier my files," "optimize for RAG," "improve retrieval quality," "should I keep compressing," "am I over-compressing," "should I accept RAG mode." Also trigger on context pressure symptoms: "Claude forgets my instructions," "responses getting generic," "content not found in my knowledge files." Also use when a project audit scores Knowledge Architecture ≤ 3. Do NOT use for content placement decisions (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available), full project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), or behavioral tuning (use rootnode-behavioral-tuning if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates whether work-in-design is ready to hand off from a chat design conversation to autonomous execution (Claude Code, n8n, agent runtime). Runs a 7-condition gate: spec stability, verification surface, invariants, pump-primer, work decomposition, rollback cost, token budget headroom. Three invocation modes — deliberate (caller provides work_context, returns JSON verdict), proactive sensing (Claude detects handoff signals in design conversation and offers the check), conversational walkthrough (Claude walks the 7 conditions as discussion topics). Returns structured JSON in all modes. Use when designing a Claude Code deployment, scoping an autonomous run, or deciding next move. Trigger on: "ready to hand off," "ready for execution," "is this CC-ready," "handoff check," "walk me through readiness," "are we ready to ship this," "should I just hand this off," or proactive detection. Do NOT use for evaluating completed work, runtime selection, or prompt quality. Profile-agnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds, validates, packages, tests, and optimizes deployment-ready Skill files (SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ + agents/) from design specifications. Three pre-build gates + 9-dimension quality gate (with D9a/b/c empirical evidence tiers) + behavioral iteration loop + automated description optimizer + blind version comparator. Use for building, reviewing, revising, testing, or optimizing Skills. Trigger on: "build this Skill," "review this Skill," "test my Skill," "optimize the description," "compare these Skill versions," "should this be a hook instead," "build a template first." Also: "my Skill doesn't activate," "my description truncates," "my SKILL.md is too long," "my Skill is overtriggering." Do NOT use when designing Skill methodology — that's design work, not packaging. Do NOT use for prompt compilation, project auditing, or prompt scoring (use rootnode-prompt-compilation, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO & GEO content linter — validates Markdown/MDX files for AI search visibility using 92 deterministic rules (35 GEO, 32 SEO, 14 content quality, 8 technical, 3 i18n). Runs an autonomous lint-fix loop: scan content, read structured violations, fix them, re-lint until clean. Use when optimizing content for AI citations, auditing SEO compliance, checking GEO readiness, or running pre-publish content validation. Triggers on: "geo-lint", "lint content", "SEO audit", "GEO", "content optimization", "AI search", "citation readiness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full AI-assisted workflow for long-form SEO content (2,000+ words). Covers JTBD strategy, E-E-A-T quality standards, and 5 production phases: research, outline, draft, editing, and SEO/publishing. Built for B2B marketing agency context. Use when: user wants to write or optimize an SEO article, mentions "SEO content", "blog post", "GTM article", "long-form content", or asks to create content with keyword strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request end-to-end using GitHub CLI. Covers diff analysis, commit history review, CI/CD check verification, severity-leveled feedback (blocking/suggestion/nit/praise), and gh pr review submission. Use when a pull request is assigned for review, performing a self-review before requesting others' input, conducting a second review after feedback is addressed, or auditing a merged PR for post-merge quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a SKILL.md file for compliance with the agentskills.io standard. Checks YAML frontmatter fields, required sections, line count limits, procedure step format, and registry synchronization. Use when a new skill needs format validation before merge, an existing skill has been modified and requires re-validation, performing a batch audit of all skills in a domain, or reviewing a contributor's skill submission in a pull request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Purify water from wild sources using boiling, filtration, and chemical methods. Covers source assessment and priority ranking, sediment pre-filtering, method selection (boiling, chemical, UV, filter), altitude-adjusted boiling procedure, chemical treatment dosages, and safe storage practices. Use when needing drinking water in a wilderness setting, when available water sources are of unknown quality, in an emergency survival situation where dehydration is a risk, or when making water safe for cooking or wound cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, classify, and selectively forget stored memories. Covers memory enumeration and classification by type/age/access frequency, staleness detection for outdated references, fidelity checks using external anchors, a decision tree for selective withdrawal, tombstoned deaccession so removed content stays recoverable, counter-memory inoculation for failed strategies that would otherwise be re-derived, preemptive filtering rules for what should never become memories, and an audit trail so forgetting itself is reviewable. Use when memory has grown large and uncurated, when project state has shifted significantly since memories were written, when retrieval quality has degraded, or as periodic maintenance alongside manage-memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish cut gemstones to final finish using progressive abrasive sequences. Covers pre-polish sanding, polishing compounds, lap selection, and quality assessment for both cabochons and faceted stones. Use when a cabochon or faceted stone has completed cutting and is ready for polishing, selecting the correct compound and lap for a specific species, troubleshooting a polish that will not reach full lustre (orange peel, haze, scratches), or re-polishing a stone with surface wear.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure render settings, compositing nodes, output formats, and execute renders via Cycles or EEVEE engines using Python API or command-line interface. Use when automating render execution for batch processing, configuring quality and performance trade-offs, setting up compositing pipelines for post-processing, generating multiple output formats from a single render, or producing final output for publication or presentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a software release cycle with milestones, feature freezes, release candidates, and go/no-go criteria. Covers calendar-based and feature-based release strategies. Use when starting planning for a major or minor version release, transitioning from ad-hoc to structured release cadence, coordinating a release across multiple teams or components, defining quality gates for a regulated project, or planning the first public release (v1.0.0) of a project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interpret a chromatogram from GC or HPLC analysis: verify system suitability parameters, identify peaks by retention time and spectral matching, perform accurate peak integration, calculate chromatographic figures of merit, and assess overall peak quality for reliable quantitation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。