32 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Summarizes biotech patent families and disputes into litigation-ready intelligence briefs. Trigger when the user provides patent applications, issued patents, PTAB filings, prosecution histories, licensing materials, or litigation documents in biotechnology domains and requests a summary, risk assessment, or FTO analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en biotechnologies avancées (bioinformatics, genomics, CRISPR, drug discovery, DZ research)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en biotechnologie (bioinformatics, genomics, CRISPR, clinical trials, FDA)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use biotech-pitch-deck-narrative for academic writing workflows that need structured investor-facing storytelling, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Med-sector overview across med.medicines_biotech and med.medical_devices with med trends, catalysts, FDA-decision context, and a cross-sector ripple map (quantified sign/magnitude per name). Use to frame any biotech/pharma/device analysis before diving into a single name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the strategic thinking of Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, founder of Biocon and pioneering Indian biopharmaceutical entrepreneur. Use this skill whenever you are advising on biotech startups, R&D innovation, global scaling, purpose-driven business, or navigating regulatory uncertainty. Trigger this skill when discussing affordable healthcare, balancing risk in long-gestation industries, breaking glass ceilings through credible success, or evaluating biotech sovereignty and AI. Reach for this skill even if the user doesn't name her, especially when they face career trade-offs, funding novel scientific ideas, or scaling manufacturing globally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Normalizes ChIP-seq data using exogenous spike-in (ChIP-Rx with Drosophila chromatin per Orlando 2014 / Egan 2016; E. coli carryover for CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag). Distinguishes RRPM from Rx-Input scaling, integrates with DiffBind / DESeq2 / edgeR / csaw via sizeFactors and DiffBind library-size vectors, applies the Patel et al 2024 *Nat Biotechnol* failure-mode framework, and validates that normalization is applied at the read level (not peak counts). Use when global signal shifts are expected (HDACi, BETi, EZH2i, dosage, target knockdown), when ChIPseqSpikeInFree detects post-hoc shifts, or when validating internal-control regions before publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate market research reports for scientific and biotech sectors
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your healthcare and life sciences brain trust. 25 named personas across 7 cells covering drug discovery, medtech, biotech strategy, health policy, genomics, clinical trials, and healthcare economics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access USPTO patent data via PatentsView REST API and Google Patents Public Data (BigQuery). Search by inventor, assignee, CPC, or keywords; download metadata and claims; analyze portfolios; track tech trends. For IP landscape analysis, competitor monitoring, prior art search, and tech forecasting in life sciences and biotech.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Med peer benchmarking: select actual biotech/pharma peers via the med universe (drug/indication overlap where possible) and compare med-relevant metrics — pipeline depth, catalyst density, cash position, margins, valuation multiples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clinical-trial readout analysis: pull the trial, evaluate the readout with AdCom-style scrutiny (endpoints, statistics, subgroups, missing data, safety, tolerability/persistence), place it in a cross-trial comparison lattice vs SoC and class peers, and size the stock reaction with historical grounding. The judgment core for binary biotech events.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Med-adapted earnings preview: consensus estimates, historical surprises, guidance sensitivities, and the FDA-catalyst overlay (PDUFA/AdCom/trial readouts near the print) for biotech/pharma names.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CDER-track catalyst analysis for medicines: PDUFA target dates, AdCom votes, sNDA/sBLA label expansions, biosimilar interchangeability and 180-day exclusivity, Orange Book state, and CRL remediation timelines — enumerated, verified, and sized per event for any biotech/pharma ticker or watchlist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Normalizes ChIP-seq data using exogenous spike-in (ChIP-Rx with Drosophila chromatin per Orlando 2014 / Egan 2016; E. coli carryover for CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag). Distinguishes RRPM from Rx-Input scaling, integrates with DiffBind / DESeq2 / edgeR / csaw via sizeFactors and DiffBind library-size vectors, applies the Patel et al 2024 *Nat Biotechnol* failure-mode framework, and validates that normalization is applied at the read level (not peak counts). Use when global signal shifts are expected (HDACi, BETi, EZH2i, dosage, target knockdown), when ChIPseqSpikeInFree detects post-hoc shifts, or when validating internal-control regions before publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and analyzes pooled prime-editor (PE) screens for installing precise genetic variants without bystander confounding. Covers pegRNA design with PRIDICT and PRIDICT2 (Mathis 2023/2024) for predicting per-pegRNA editing efficiency, pegRNA architecture (spacer + scaffold + PBS + RTT), PE2 / PE3 / PE3b / PEmax / PEAR variants, MOSAIC in situ saturation mutagenesis (Hsu JY et al 2024 bioRxiv), the PRIME pooled-screen methodology (Erwood/Doman 2023 Nat Biotechnol 41:885; ~3,699 ClinVar variant screens), chromatin context as a primary determinant of PE efficiency, scaffold-incorporation and indel byproduct quantification with CRISPResso2, and the cross-modal validation strategy of PE + base-editor screens for variant function. Use when designing a pegRNA library for variant installation, choosing between BE and PE for a specific edit, predicting pegRNA efficiency before library synthesis, analyzing PE screen output, distinguishing intended-edit from scaffold-incorporation, or scaling PE screens to thousands of variants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。