「cover」の検索結果

Complete guide for code coverage analysis. Use when you need to analyze code coverage, generate coverage reports, or configure CI/CD coverage checks. Covers Coverlet configuration, report generation, metric interpretation, and cyclomatic complexity integration. Includes Fine Code Coverage, VS Code built-in tools, and best practices. Keywords: code coverage, coverage analysis, coverage report, Coverlet, Fine Code Coverage, dotnet-coverage, ReportGenerator, line coverage, branch coverage, cyclomatic complexity, runsettings, cobertura

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure and improve test coverage meaningfully. Covers Istanbul/V8/coverage.py configuration, coverage gap analysis by risk, coverage-as-ratchet in CI (never let it decrease), PR coverage diff checks, mutation testing for assertion quality, and distinguishing meaningful from vanity coverage. Use when: "code coverage," "coverage gap," "Istanbul," "coverage threshold," "coverage report," "branch coverage." Not for: writing the tests that raise coverage — use unit-testing; coverage as a tracked KPI trend over time — use qa-metrics. Related: unit-testing, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-qa-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Coveralls — coveralls coverage tracking management. Covers coverage reporting, PR status checks, repository configuration, coverage history, and badge management. Use when managing Coveralls coverage reports, configuring coverage thresholds, debugging coverage uploads, or analyzing coverage trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perlのテスト作成・実行から、外部処理の置き換え、例外の確認、テスト範囲の測定まで支えるスキル。テスト先行の開発や既存テストの移行にも使えます。

• テスト先行でPerlを開発
• Test::Moreからのテスト移行
• APIやDB連携を独立して検証

Orchestrate any tdmcp test-coverage work: run the coverage harness, inspect coverage gaps, plan focused Vitest/msw or bridge tests, delegate coverage writers, verify coverage deltas, and re-run gates. Use whenever the user asks to raise coverage, add broad regression coverage, create a test harness, improve tests, re-run a coverage wave, or fix a coverage gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate any tdmcp test-coverage work: run the coverage harness, inspect coverage gaps, plan focused Vitest/msw or bridge tests, delegate coverage writers, verify coverage deltas, and re-run gates. Use whenever the user asks to raise coverage, add broad regression coverage, create a test harness, improve tests, re-run a coverage wave, or fix a coverage gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `coverlet` toolchain for .NET code coverage. Use when a repo needs line and branch coverage, collector versus MSBuild driver selection, or CI-safe coverage commands. USE FOR: coverlet setup; CI line or branch coverage; choosing between collector and MSBuild drivers. DO NOT USE FOR: coverage report rendering by itself; repos that intentionally use a different coverage engine. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Xiaohongshu (XHS / RedNote) cover images using GPT Image 2 / Codex image generation first, with the legacy Gemini CLI as fallback. Triggers for cover generation: "生成封面", "小红书封面", "xhs封面", "制作封面", "帮我做张图", "XHS cover", "RedNote cover". Triggers for cover editing: "修改封面", "改一下封面", "上一张图基础上", "基于这张图调整", "不要重新做", "edit this cover". Triggers for style learning: "学习这个风格", "提取风格", "我想自定义风格", "这张图的风格", "learn this style", "extract style". Always trigger this skill when user mentions 小红书/XHS/RedNote together with 封面/cover/图片, OR when user uploads a reference image and asks about creating a similar style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks to summarize, or asks why Simulink Coverage objectives are missing, unsatisfied, or uncovered on a coverage result they already have — why specific decision, condition, MCDC, relational-boundary, or saturation/overflow outcomes weren't exercised, whether uncovered logic is dead code, or how to close the gap (a test, a coverage filter, or a design change). It reads an existing cvdata, .cvt file, sim-with-coverage output, or Simulink Test result; it never runs cvsim to collect coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Xiaohongshu (XHS / RedNote) cover images using GPT Image 2 / Codex image generation first, with the legacy Gemini CLI as fallback. Triggers for cover generation: "生成封面", "小红书封面", "xhs封面", "制作封面", "帮我做张图", "XHS cover", "RedNote cover". Triggers for cover editing: "修改封面", "改一下封面", "上一张图基础上", "基于这张图调整", "不要重新做", "edit this cover". Triggers for style learning: "学习这个风格", "提取风格", "我想自定义风格", "这张图的风格", "learn this style", "extract style". Always trigger this skill when user mentions 小红书/XHS/RedNote together with 封面/cover/图片, OR when user uploads a reference image and asks about creating a similar style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when deploying a trained Einstein Discovery model to production records declaratively — activating a prediction definition, mapping output fields to page layouts, adding the Einstein Discovery Action to a Flow, running bulk predict jobs, and monitoring model health via Model Manager UI. Trigger keywords: prediction definition activation, bulk predict job, Einstein Discovery Flow action, Model Manager, prediction field mapping, model refresh activation, scoring job, Einstein Discovery recommendations on record. NOT for authoring the story in CRM Analytics Studio — use admin/einstein-discovery-setup. NOT for programmatic scoring through the API — use agentforce/einstein-discovery-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when an admin needs to create an Einstein Discovery story in CRM Analytics Studio, configure prediction definitions, deploy writeback fields, set up what-if analysis, or manage model refresh and activation. Trigger keywords: Einstein Discovery story, prediction definition, writeback field, CRM Analytics Studio, model refresh, what-if analysis, bulk scoring, prediction field, 1OR prefix. NOT for the Einstein Discovery Flow action or model-health monitoring in Model Manager — use admin/einstein-discovery-deployment. NOT for Einstein Prediction Builder, a separate product needing no CRM Analytics license — use agentforce/einstein-prediction-builder. NOT for programmatic scoring through the Connect REST API — use agentforce/einstein-discovery-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write effective unit tests with Jest, Vitest, or pytest. Covers the test-doubles taxonomy (stub/spy/mock/fake), Arrange-Act-Assert, coverage threshold configuration and CI gating, snapshot testing, fake timers, and mutation testing with Stryker/mutmut. Use when: "unit test," "Jest," "Vitest," "pytest," "mock," "coverage threshold," "test doubles," "mutation testing," "fake timers," "snapshot test." Not for: interpreting coverage reports or finding coverage gaps — use coverage-analysis; AI generating the test code for you — use ai-test-generation; auditing existing tests for smells — use ai-qa-review; browser/component rendering assertions — use cypress-automation or visual-testing. Related: coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, ai-test-generation, shift-left-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes structured recovery from a ransomware incident following NIST and CISA frameworks, including environment isolation, forensic evidence preservation, clean infrastructure rebuild, prioritized system restoration from verified backups, credential reset, and validation against re-infection. Covers Active Directory recovery, database restoration, and application stack rebuild in dependency order. Activates for requests involving ransomware recovery, post-encryption restoration, or disaster recovery from ransomware.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure and prepare for a sales discovery call. Use when the user says "prep for discovery call", "discovery call questions", "how to structure my discovery call", "first call with a prospect", "what to ask on a discovery call", "sales call prep", "plan my discovery call", "initial call framework", or wants to prepare for or debrief a first sales conversation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Codecov — codecov coverage tracking management. Covers coverage reporting, PR comments, flag management, component analysis, and coverage trend tracking. Use when managing Codecov configuration, analyzing coverage reports, debugging coverage uploads, or configuring coverage thresholds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

完成した差分・PR・検証証拠に残る Unknown（未確認の前提・調査されていない影響・ 不足している証拠）を横断合成する evidence-sufficiency のメタ観点。個別 defect の 検出は既存 skill へ委譲し、本 skill は「そのリスク種別を調査した証拠が残っているか」 の meta 評価のみを行う。通常は finding verification 後の generic 合成ステップとして、 明示的 Security Audit では SecurityAuditCoverage 専用 profile として report-only で実行する。 残存 Unknown は既存 Unknown Coverage 構造へ出力し、新しい語彙・schema は作らない。

[omh] Unvalidated early product idea: test whether a customer problem, segment, and business hypothesis deserve product investment, ending in kill, pivot, persevere, or inconclusive before any PRD. Use when the user says: product-discovery-validation, product discovery validation, product discovery, customer discovery, customer discovery plan, zero to one validation, validate the problem before building, problem solution interview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。