「cross-domain」の検索結果

Applies TRIZ cross-domain analogical reasoning to find solutions from adjacent fields. Use when stuck on a problem and needing inventive perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-mathematical connections, cross-domain synthesis, and the Complex Plane as a navigational tool. Classifies problems by quadrant (Abstract/Embodied x Logic/Creativity), routes them to relevant domains, and traces dependency chains. Use when classifying mathematical problems across domains, navigating the Complex Plane of Experience, finding cross-domain connections, or building multi-domain solution strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep cross-domain synthesis engine for the vault. Triggers on "synthesize X", "what do I know about X", "connect ideas about X", "cross-domain analysis of X", "map everything in the vault about X". Searches comprehensively, surfaces non-obvious patterns and tensions, then challenges the user to generate original thought. The vault should surprise you — if synthesis only confirms what you already think, it failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial reviewer for The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor and Bonded Commons. Probes federation-specific threats: trust transitivity, cross-harbor token forgery, federated revocation under partition, cross-harbor Sybil, cross-domain settlement, equivocation, bond-pool draining, cold-start joining, federation-operator Sybil. Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-whitehat. NOT for incident response, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use redteam-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolutionary ideation engine — loop-controlled multi-cycle idea generation through phases of dreaming, cross-domain stealing, recombination, fitness testing, selection, and Lamarckian meta-learning, producing ranked novel solution candidates with provenance. USE WHEN ideate, id8, novel ideas, evolve ideas, dream up solutions, innovate, breakthrough ideas, idea evolution, multi-cycle creativity, need genuinely new approaches. NOT FOR quick single-pass brainstorming (use BeCreative).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-domain pattern analysis with personal, professional, and project domain synthesis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-domain pattern analysis and strategic reflection for weekly review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver a large, cross-domain Phoenix feature or complete end-to-end system through planning, implementation, verification, and review. Use when several coordinated workflows or contexts must ship together. NOT for an existing plan; use /phx:work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Automotive Engineer. Use when a task calls for Automotive Engineer judgment. Reasons from vehicle-level requirements, regulatory limits, energy/exergy budgets, and distribution-based durability through DFMEA/DVP&R, DoE calibration (INCA, CANape, HIL), Pacejka tire and multibody models, rainflow fatigue, and source-path NVH analysis while treating undocumented build-level and cal-ID deltas, unmet emissions preconditioning and OBD readiness, ADAS sensor misalignment, and cross-domain torque-arbitration conflicts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refracting thinking by challenging assumptions, combining cross-domain knowledge, and shifting perspectives to reframe problems. Use for stuck situations or paradigm shifts. Does not write code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update root and nested AGENTS.md files that document scoped conventions, monorepo module maps, cross-domain workflows, and (optionally) per-module feature maps (feature -> paths, entrypoints, tests, docs). Use when the user asks for AGENTS.md, nested agent instructions, or a module/feature map.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured procedure for expanding attention from focused single-domain mode to panoramic multi-domain awareness. The cognitive transition from "focused attention on one problem" to "unfocused attention encompassing all relevant domains simultaneously." Like Baars' Global Workspace — consciousness as broadcast rather than spotlight. Use after meditation has cleared noise, when a problem spans multiple domains that need to be perceived together, when single-domain analysis keeps missing cross-domain connections, or as the opening move before integrate-gestalt synthesizes what is perceived.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Communicate an integrated insight in a way that is accessible, actionable, and preserves the multi-domain nature of the understanding. Integrated insights are multi-dimensional — linearizing them risks losing the relationships that make them valuable. This skill provides a structured procedure for choosing the right form, expressing the gestalt with honest attribution, and inviting productive challenge. Use after integrate-gestalt has formed a cross-domain understanding that needs to be communicated to an audience — domain specialists, generalists, or decision-makers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Habitual Domain (HD) theory by Taiwanese scholar P.L. Yu (游伯龍, 1977) — integrates four domains (potential/actual/reachable/activated), eight general hypotheses, seven-layer decision structure, and nine HD-expansion tools to analyze decision blind spots, break cognitive inertia, and support cross-domain integration. Use for diagnosing why alternatives are invisible, decision paralysis, breaking cognitive frames, or explaining perception gaps between people. Triggers: 『思維框架』『打破盲點』『創新思考』『決策盲區』『跨域整合』『游伯龍』『習慣領域』『HD 理論』『七層決策』『四領域』『八大通性』『P.L. Yu』. Especially for NYCU EMBA HD course, 政大科管所, 中山企管系 decision-analysis/innovation/leadership courses. Taiwan-origin theory cited in J. Optimization Theory, Theory & Decision, Human Systems Management.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish SAML 2.0 identity federation between on-premises Active Directory and Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID) for seamless cross-domain authentication and SSO to cloud applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RSI Phase 3: Cross-domain metasketill extraction

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull design principles from architecture, fashion, film, industrial design, and physical spaces into screen-based design. Use when seeking inspiration beyond digital, expanding creative range, or building cross-disciplinary design vocabulary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish SAML 2.0 identity federation between on-premises Active Directory and Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID) for seamless cross-domain authentication and SSO to cloud applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish SAML 2.0 identity federation between on-premises Active Directory and Azure AD (Microsoft Entra ID) for seamless cross-domain authentication and SSO to cloud applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafting and iterating sections of The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor (local identity) and Bonded Commons (local coordination), extending coordination across machines and administrative domains. Use when authoring a section, rewriting a section after a redteam/whitehat round, or composing a new chapter. NOT for marketing copy, NOT for the other two papers, NOT for production threat response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive counterpart to federated-harbor-redteam: closes the smells that red team opens against The Federated Harbor whitepaper. Federation-specific defenses for cross-harbor primitives — mechanization commitments, scope hedges, cross-paper dependency formalization, pre-emptive analogies (CT, Macaroons, atomic swaps), and defense-in-depth framing (refuses vs prices). Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-redteam. NOT for ad-hoc code review, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use whitehat-defense).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。