「dac」の検索結果

Redact reverse-engineering findings for public disclosure while preserving methodology, generalizable patterns, and teaching value. Covers the private-vs-public repo split, deny-list pattern maintenance, orphan-commit publish pattern that prevents `git log` leaks, category-based redaction calibration (methodology/pattern/version-finding/internal), and the `check-redaction.sh`-style CI gate that blocks merges when a deny-listed pattern appears. Use when publishing findings about a CLI harness you don't own, when preparing upstream proposals to an unrelated project, or when archiving a private research repo for public reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redact rendered visual artifacts — Mermaid diagrams, SVGs, and HTML dashboards — before public disclosure, using an ordered longest-first mapping table (specific label, then namespace label, then catch-all placeholder) that swaps sensitive identifiers for descriptive stand-ins while preserving structure, node ids, and teaching value. Covers whole-word identifier replacement, node-label-vs-node-id discrimination, re-rendering the derived image from the redacted source, and verifying the result through the redaction gate. Use when a diagram or dashboard built from internal findings must ship to a public mirror without leaking the names behind it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step-by-step guidance for DACH-specific governmental procedures including Anmeldung, Finanzamt registration, health insurance enrollment, and social security coordination. Use after arriving in a DACH country and needing to complete mandatory registrations, before a specific appointment to understand what to expect, when an initial registration attempt was rejected, when transitioning between DACH countries, or when handling registrations for dependents alongside your own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes redactions of personal identifiers in pasted text or an attached document (names, contact details, identification and account numbers, dates that identify, quasi-identifiers) and returns a DRAFT redacted copy with consistent placeholder tokens plus a redaction table stating what was replaced, where and why, with a confidence level and a blank reviewer decision per row. Use when the user asks to "redact the names in this document", "de-identify this transcript before we share it", "strip personal data from these notes", "anonymise this report for publication" or "what would need redacting here". Do not use for assessing a planned processing activity, use dpia-draft-pack instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Never declares a document anonymised, safe to release or compliant. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent fallback for CCSWeaponBase_ItemPostFrame_ProcessReloadAction (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CCSWeaponBase::ItemPostFrame::ProcessReloadAction in the CS2 server module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CCSWeaponBase_ItemPostFrame_ProcessReloadAction, CCSWeaponBase::ItemPostFrame::ProcessReloadAction

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain the plugins bundled in this repository (htpasswd, local-storage, auth-memory, memory, audit, package-filter, ui-theme) and the plugin contracts in @verdaccio/core — fix a bundled plugin, change a pluginUtils interface safely, diagnose why a plugin does not load, or verify a plugin with @verdaccio/plugin-verifier. Use when a task touches packages/plugins, packages/loaders, pluginUtils, or a plugin loading problem. Requests to add a new bundled plugin are gated on an accepted discussion thread; this skill says how to handle them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an existing verdaccio/verdaccio pull request end to end — description, diff, review threads, CI, labels, changeset, release-line coverage — verify the findings, and report them; optionally fix them on the PR branch when asked. Use when given a PR number or URL to review, re-review, or "review and fix".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose and apply the labels for a verdaccio/verdaccio pull request — exactly one release-line label plus content labels from the repository's existing taxonomy (typically one to three, more for a genuinely large multi-topic PR), never security, and AI assisted only on the author's own PR. Use right after gh pr create, when editing a PR, when reviewing a PR whose labels are missing or wrong, or when asked which labels a change should carry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage an incoming verdaccio/verdaccio GitHub issue against the codebase, the affected release line, and related issues, then choose the labels from the repository's existing taxonomy. Use whenever the user asks to triage, classify, assess, reproduce, prioritize, or label an issue, especially when an issue URL or number is supplied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a change through a verdaccio/verdaccio pull request — branch, checks, changeset, title, body, labels, draft-to-ready, then the CI and review rounds after every push, plus the port PRs to other release lines. Use when opening a PR, after pushing to one, when a check fails, or when review comments arrive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.

Redact a network/MITM capture directory — JSONL, JSON, logs, HAR-style dumps — in place before it can be referenced publicly, scrubbing credential tokens, API keys, service ids, UUIDs, emails, home paths, usernames, and device or session hashes while preserving token-class prefixes for analysis and leaving public identifiers untouched. Covers class-preserving substitution, an idempotent re-runnable pass, distinguishing a secret from a public id, and verifying the scrubbed capture through the redaction gate. Use when a wire capture from a sanctioned probe must enter notes, a guide, or a public repo without leaking the session that produced it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a complete EU/DACH relocation timeline with dependency mapping between bureaucratic steps, deadline tracking, and country-specific procedure identification. Use when planning a move between EU/DACH countries, relocating from a non-EU country to an EU/DACH destination, coordinating employment-based relocation with employer HR, managing a relocation with tight deadlines, or when needing a single document that maps the entire relocation process end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Codacy — codacy code quality management. Covers automated code reviews, pattern configuration, coverage tracking, security analysis, and repository settings. Use when managing Codacy projects, reviewing code patterns, configuring quality gates, or tracking code quality trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawのGitHub Secret Scanningアラートを調べ、IssueやPRなどに残る秘密情報の伏せ字化、コメントの削除・再作成、通知とアラート処理を進めるスキル。

• 認証情報の漏えい箇所を調べたいとき
• IssueやPR本文の秘密情報の伏せ字化
• 秘密情報を含むコメントの削除・再作成

Select and run the checks that actually cover a change in the verdaccio monorepo — rebuild the touched packages, run their tests and their dependents' tests, the api integration suite, the e2e CLI battery or the Cypress UI suite when the change is client- or UI-visible — and recognise the cases where a scoped run passes without testing anything. Use whenever verifying a change before committing or pushing, or when deciding what to run after an edit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a verdaccio diff, branch, or pull request against the repository review guide (security first, then npm-client compatibility, performance, product fit, maintainability), verify each finding against the code, and report actionable issues. Use for code reviews and for reviewing your own changes before or during a PR workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a verdaccio bug fix, feature, or refactor — establish the affected release lines, check whether existing configuration, package-access rules, plugins, or uplink options already solve it, put the change in the layer that owns it, reuse existing helpers, add tests and a changeset, and validate. Use when asked to implement a change in this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up, download, verify, and seed the optional Grida Library developer corpus into local Supabase. Use when Library browse/search, Desktop reference picking, or agent Library tools need realistic local assets and Gemini embeddings; also use when changing the gridaco/grida consumer for gridaco/library developer-corpus releases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages Data Subject Access Request procedures for employee requests under Art. 15 GDPR. Covers scope of disclosable HR records, emails, CCTV footage, performance reviews, monitoring data, and training records. Implements third-party data redaction, legal professional privilege, exemptions for ongoing proceedings, and the one-month response timeline. Keywords: DSAR, subject access request, Art. 15, employee records, redaction, privilege, HR data, SAR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mask, redact, and anonymize sensitive data (PII, PCI, PHI) in databases, logs, and APIs. Use when protecting PII in dev/staging environments, redacting sensitive data from logs, anonymizing data for analytics, or applying k-anonymity and differential privacy for GDPR-compliant data sharing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load, validate, and use DACP bundles as structured execution context. Detects .bundle/ companion directories, validates integrity (manifest schema, fidelity, provenance), loads typed data, and builds ExecutionContext for receiving agents. Scripts are NEVER auto-executed. Use when processing incoming DACP bundles, interpreting .bundle/ directories alongside .msg files, validating bundle integrity, or building execution context from bundle payloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically enforce a privacy/redaction boundary on an artifact tree before publication, the way an AST checker enforces a code contract. Builds a two-tier gate — a shape-based deny-list (regex over identifier shapes) plus a structure-aware tier that parses JSON/HTML/SVG/Markdown/code and asserts sensitive content cannot appear in meaningful positions — with a strict exit-code contract, label-only output that never echoes the patterns themselves, and false-positive narrowing instead of suppressions. Use when gating a public mirror, a disclosure draft, a wire-capture export, or any artifact that must pass a leak check before it ships, and when a plain line-grep is too coarse to trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redact PII in your own code before it reaches Agentforce prompts, models, and logs. Trigger keywords: agentforce pii, pii redaction, data masking llm, prompt pii filter, audit pii leakage. NOT for turning on the platform's own masking, zero-retention and audit-trail controls — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer. NOT for masking PII in a refreshed sandbox — use security/sandbox-data-masking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。