Use when reviewing HTTP response headers for defense-in-depth security hardening on any web application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
32 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing HTTP response headers for defense-in-depth security hardening on any web application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain framework to identify which phases an adversary has completed, where defenses succeeded or failed, and what controls would have interrupted the attack at earlier phases. Use when conducting post-incident analysis, building prevention-focused security controls, or mapping detection gaps to kill chain phases. Activates for requests involving kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, or Lockheed Martin kill chain framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging frameworks for finding and fixing bugs - includes root cause analysis, defense-in-depth validation, and verification protocols
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls. Use when building, deploying, or hardening agentic AI systems that invoke tools, access data, or interact with production infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
STRIDE threat modeling, DREAD risk scoring, secret detection, and secure architecture design. Use when conducting threat models, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, designing defense-in-depth, or scanning for hardcoded secrets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides security professionals in implementing defense-in-depth security architectures, achieving compliance with industry frameworks (SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, HIPAA), conducting threat modeling and risk assessments, managing security operations and incident response, and embedding security throughout the SDLC.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduces attack surface across OS, container, cloud, network, and database layers using CIS Benchmarks and zero-trust principles. Use when hardening production infrastructure, meeting compliance requirements, or implementing defense-in-depth security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design comprehensive security architectures using defense-in-depth, zero trust principles, threat modeling (STRIDE, PASTA), and control frameworks (NIST CSF, CIS Controls, ISO 27001). Use when designing security for new systems, auditing existing architectures, or establishing security governance programs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure host-based firewalls (iptables, nftables, UFW) and cloud security groups (AWS, GCP, Azure) with practical rules for common scenarios like web servers, databases, and bastion hosts. Use when exposing services, hardening servers, or implementing network segmentation with defense-in-depth strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
System hardening, detection engineering, security baseline monitoring, patch management, defense-in-depth architecture, and security posture improvement
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible. Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements CSRF protection using synchronizer tokens, double-submit cookies, and SameSite attributes. Use when securing web forms, protecting state-changing endpoints, or implementing defense-in-depth authentication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REST API security hardening with authentication, rate limiting, input validation, security headers. Use for production APIs, security audits, defense-in-depth, or encountering vulnerabilities, injection attacks, CORS issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply security-conscious thinking when generating or modifying code. Enforces trust boundary awareness, input validation, injection prevention, secrets management, and defense-in-depth authorization. Use when generating code that handles user input, authentication, authorization, database queries, external APIs, or file operations, or when the user mentions 'security review', 'secure this', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'trust boundary', 'input validation', or 'OWASP'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the security posture of generated code -- not architecture (see architecture) and not code craft (see clean-code).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement layered collective defense using alarm signaling, role mobilization, and proportional response. Covers threat detection, alert propagation, immune response patterns, escalation tiers, and post-incident recovery for distributed systems and organizations. Use when designing defense-in-depth where no single guardian covers all threats, building incident response that scales with severity, or when current defense is over-reactive to every alert or under-reactive to genuine threats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-layer validation to catch bugs before they escape
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when validation needs entry, business-logic, environment, and instrumentation guards so a bad value cannot reach the failure point — turns a local bug fix into a structural one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain framework to identify which phases an adversary has completed, where defenses succeeded or failed, and what controls would have interrupted the attack at earlier phases. Use when conducting post-incident analysis, building prevention-focused security controls, or mapping detection gaps to kill chain phases. Activates for requests involving kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, or Lockheed Martin kill chain framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。