「document-review」の検索結果

Extract structured data from multiple documents into comparison matrix with citations. Use for bulk document review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.

Use for structured review, fact-checking, annotation, and correction of documents such as PDF, DOCX, PPTX, and XLSX files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews financial documents (prospectuses, ADVs, marketing materials) for FINRA 2210 compliance, required disclosures, and balanced presentation. Use when reviewing financial statements, audit documents, regulatory filings, or when the user mentions compliance checks, financial audits, or document verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits brand/ files for completeness, consistency, and freshness. Use when the agent or user wants to review brand files, audit marketing docs, check brand consistency, verify brand health, or assess what's missing from brand memory. Produces a structured audit report with per-file scores, cross-file contradiction detection, staleness flags, and recommended next skills to run. This is the quality gate for the brand memory system. Also use when someone says 'check my brand', 'brand audit', 'what's missing', 'is my brand ready', 'brand health', 'review my marketing docs', or before running any campaign to verify brand foundations are solid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

設計文書、分析レポート、報告書などを批判的な視点で徹底レビューするスキル。 6つの異なる立場（開発者、PM、顧客、QA、セキュリティ、運用）のペルソナを持つサブエージェントが並列でレビューを実行し、 「本当にそうか？」「根拠は何か？」「テストできるか？」「運用できるか？」という視点で 曖昧さ、根拠不足、論理飛躍、テスト不能、セキュリティリスク、運用懸念を検出する。 Use when reviewing design documents, analysis reports, incident reports, or any document requiring rigorous validation of claims and evidence.

Expert en eDiscovery (document review, data processing, ESI, litigation hold, TAR)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。