「human-review」の検索結果

Apply MCAF human-review-planning guidance for a large AI-generated code drop by reading the target area, tracing the natural user and system flows, identifying the riskiest boundaries, and prioritizing the files a human should inspect first. Use when the codebase is too large to review line-by-line and you need a practical review sequence plus a prioritized file list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns marketing prompts into tested, versioned production assets: A/B prompt evaluation against structured test cases, immutable prompt version history with diffs, ready-to-use marketing prompt templates (ad copy, email campaigns, social posts, landing pages, SEO meta), and an LLM-governance playbook for marketing teams (claim discipline, disclosure rules, human-review gates). Use when a marketing team relies on AI-generated content and needs prompt quality to be measurable and safe — or when the user mentions 'prompt engineering,' 'improve my prompts,' 'prompt templates,' 'prompt versioning,' 'AI content workflow,' or 'AI governance for marketing.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven feature work that freezes obligations instead of the plan: one human-reviewed plan with EARS criteria, path, entities, interface and one-way doors, then proof-backed checks, then build, then an independent Verifier. Use when the user says "tlc-spec-lean", "plan feature", "specify feature", "write the checks", "build this plan", or "verify work". Do NOT use for standalone design documents unattached to a feature, architecture decomposition analysis, or work that already has a task list or checklist to execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and composite HeyGen digital-human videos in the content workspace. Use whenever the user asks for a 数字人, 数字人5, HeyGen, AI 口播人物, 数字人小窗, 圆形头像口播, full-screen digital human, or asks to make a video that uses the existing avatar. Enforce Creator-plan CLI OAuth, the configured Digital Twin, local IndexTTS2 narration, Avatar III for an unspecified digital human but Avatar V whenever the named preset 数字人5 is requested, adaptive face measurement plus the approved human-reviewed visual-centering offset in the headroom_08 circular bottom-left layout unless full-screen is explicitly requested, subtitle-safe placement, credit-aware master reuse, final QC/archive routing, and mandatory pairing with `heygen-avatar-motion` before any motion prompt or paid generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a Jev-powered decision and release gate after an office assistant generates a report, proposal, spreadsheet, document, or slide deck. Use for claim-to-evidence checks, narrow requirement decisions, risk triage, and human-review routing; do not use it to generate the deliverable or claim that Jev browsed or verified a URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break large features into independently verifiable, human-reviewable slices under a feature directory in specs/. Use for risky or multi-step feature work that needs upfront questioning, API seams, browser-playable checkpoints, HTML visualizations, screenshot gates, staged implementation plans, recursive fog-of-war reslicing, or proactive research into reference implementations/best practices before slicing. Pairs with your project's verification harness and screenshot gates (the browser checkpoints), [refactor-clean](../refactor-clean/SKILL.md) (review the materialized spec so the plan describes one-owner architecture, not the feature bolted on), [screenshot-critique](../../visual/screenshot-critique/SKILL.md) and [compare-screenshots](../../visual/compare-screenshots/SKILL.md) (the visual gates), and a code-review pass (audit each slice before it lands).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Verify for snapshot testing in .NET. Approve API surfaces, HTTP responses, rendered emails, and serialized outputs. Detect unintended changes through human-reviewed baseline files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits legal AI outputs, prompts, skills, workflows and MCP/tool instructions for fluent but unsupported reasoning, missing evidence, overconfidence, hidden assumptions, weak causal links and absent human-review gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project completed stage Artifacts into a concise human-review block in `DECISIONS.md`; use before a Workflow checkpoint, not for Workflow routing or approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements data subject rights mechanisms for AI systems including right to explanation of AI decisions, contestation procedures, human review, model output correction, and training data access. Covers GDPR Arts. 15-22 and AI Act Art. 86. Keywords: data subject rights, AI explanation, contestation, human review, training data access, model correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Social Media Manager role skill. Orchestrates the full SMB social media workflow across three layers — Foundation (brand setup + calendar), Content Creation (captions, platform-specialist posts, visuals), and Distribution (scheduling via Blotato + performance review). Coordinates all 9 component skills as a sequential, human-reviewed pipeline. Run this skill instead of invoking component skills individually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you finish an analiz report - the human must approve the analysis before any implementation task is created, via the analiz_review column

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Verify for snapshot testing in .NET. Approve API surfaces, HTTP responses, rendered emails, and serialized outputs. Detect unintended changes through human-reviewed baseline files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a holistic, human-reviewer-style critique of the currently staged Git changes (or, with `--working-copy`, of all uncommitted changes, with `--branch`, of a branch against its base, or, with `--commit`, of a single commit) and emit an approve/reject verdict with prioritized, severity-tagged, line-cited findings. Use when the user wants the staged diff, a branch, or a commit "reviewed", "critiqued", or "code-reviewed".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate trained models and analytical claims against their intended decision, independent evidence, and human-reviewed ground truth. Use when reviewing model performance, analysis conclusions, launch claims, or evaluation reports; use failure diagnosis instead when the main task is locating a known defect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。