「judgment」の検索結果

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for handling ambiguous decisions and missing/conflicting knowledge during code generation, design, and review. Ensures AI surfaces genuine judgment calls with structured options and stops on hallucination risk instead of silently assuming. Use when a decision has multiple valid approaches, when facts are missing or contradictory, when the user asks 'what should we do here?', 'is this a judgment call?', 'should I ask about this?', 'am I guessing here?', 'what are the tradeoffs?', or when deciding between two reasonable architectural or design options. Also composed by molecules to define how judgment calls and clarification requests are surfaced and resolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要做方向性判断、评估「该往哪走/这事靠谱吗」、或想提升决策能力时调用。 核心理念: 判断力(知道行为长期后果)比努力重要; 清晰思考=从基础学科重建推理; 收集心智模型(复利/委托代理/可证伪性/基础数学)。 不适用于: 需要立即执行的具体任务步骤。 Triggers: 判断力/方向/第一性原理/心智模型/思维模型/判断靠不靠谱/judgment/mental model/first principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: judgment day, dual review, adversarial review, juzgar. Run explicit blind dual review with at most two scoped fix/re-judgment rounds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: judgment day, judgement day, dual review, adversarial review, juzgar. Run explicit blind dual review with at most two scoped fix/re-judgment rounds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compensation, Benefits, and Job Analysis Specialist — market-pricing a job against salary survey data, scoring a job through a point-factor or IPE job evaluation, running a pay-equity regression or cohort analysis, building or refreshing a salary structure and compa-ratio bands, classifying a job family's FLSA exemption status through the duties test, or modeling benefits plan cost (loss ratio, PEPM, self-funded vs. fully insured). Distinct from hr-people-manager (owns the comp/leveling judgment calls — whether to approve an exception, promote someone into a level), hr-specialist (owns individual-case leave/I-9/ADA/FLSA reclassification for one employee's drifted duties), and compensation-benefits-manager (owns pay philosophy, negotiation-range policy, and the department that runs this work). This role owns the mechanics: the survey match, the point score, the regression, the band math — the analysis those upstream policy and downstream judgment calls are made against.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for rhythm games including audio synchronization (BPM conductor, latency compensation with AudioServer.get_time_since_last_mix), note highways (scroll speed, timing windows), judgment systems (Perfect/Great/Good/Bad/Miss), scoring with combo multipliers, input processing (lane-based, hold note detection), and chart/beatmap loading. Based on DDR/osu!/Beat Saber research. Trigger keywords: rhythm_game, audio_sync, timing_judgment, note_highway, combo_system, BPM_conductor, latency_compensation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenTSC v2.1: Soul/Shell architecture for interpersonal intelligence. Local, offline-first, with event graphs, judgment engine (K7), self-creation (K8), three-layer attributes, calibrated predictions, 11 VSM professions, and a pluggable zvec memory index (semantic search, identity resolution, jieba segmentation, emotion scoring incl. batched+cached LLM) that runs with zero extra deps. Transforms implicit social judgment into explicit, queryable, auditable, evolving intelligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging a prevailing analytical judgment, the user asks "what is the opposing case?" / "argue the other side" / "play devil's advocate", or wants an assessment stress-tested before release. Takes the team's own lead judgment and builds the strongest case that it is wrong. A contrarian technique. It does not model what an adversary would do next, which is Red Team Analysis. Formerly /red-team-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply dual-process theory to diagnose whether judgments arise from fast intuitive (System 1) or slow analytical (System 2) processing and identify resulting cognitive biases. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why quick decisions go wrong, design choice architectures that account for cognitive defaults, audit decision processes for heuristic errors, or when they ask 'why do people misjudge probability', 'how to reduce snap-judgment errors', or 'when does intuition fail'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronic Equipment Assembler — inspecting a solder joint against the specific IPC/J-STD workmanship standard criteria rather than personal visual judgment, following ESD precautions for every component handled since damage is invisible at the time it occurs, verifying a crimped connection with a pull test rather than visual inspection alone, or treating a single suspected cold joint as a potential complete failure point rather than a minor defect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bioinformatics Scientist — designing a differential-expression or GWAS analysis with correct multiple-testing correction, calling and triaging variants from NGS data using genotype-likelihood confidence rather than raw allele counts, interpreting a BLAST/DIAMOND homology search, choosing or building a genomics pipeline (aligner, caller, normalization method) for a specific data-generating process, or judging whether a computational-biology analysis's statistical design actually supports the biological claim being made. Distinct from a bioinformatics-technician (executes and QC-gates an established pipeline someone else designed) and a data-scientist (general product/experimentation judgment, not genomics-specific statistics) — this role owns which method and statistical model a genomics question requires, and why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when forensically auditing a Claude Code skill/agent/command/workflow library against RULESET.md by a fixed mechanical protocol — probing every file against the mechanically-checkable rules and reporting CONFORMS / VIOLATES / UNVERIFIABLE / N-A counts with quoted evidence. It casts NO judgment and emits NO pass/fail verdict; counts are the headline. Triggers on "investigate the library", "audit against RULESET", "find every violation", "forensic library audit", "evidence-only check". Not for routing/quality/single-responsibility judgment — use skill-library-review. Not the full sharded sweep — use the audit-library command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts post-judgment motions for attorneys' fees using the lodestar method. Covers prevailing party analysis, rate justification, hours documentation, billing judgment, lodestar enhancements, and supporting declarations. Trigger when user needs a fee motion, fee petition, lodestar calculation, or post-trial fee application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a post-judgment asset and enforcement report synthesizing debtor asset investigations, exemption analysis, fraudulent transfer assessment, and prioritized collection strategies. Use when preparing judgment enforcement plans, debtor asset profiles, collection status reports, or post-trial recovery analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an Appellee's Response Brief defending the trial court's judgment and arguing for affirmance. Covers standard of review analysis, record-based rebuttal, authority distinction, and procedural compliance. Trigger when drafting appellee briefs, response briefs, answering briefs, or defending trial court judgments on appeal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

【穴埋め雛形】このプロジェクト固有の「存在設計・体験設計」のSSOT。judgment-harness のプロジェクト層スキルとして、立ち上げ時に本ファイルを埋めて使う（雛形のままなら未確定＝推測で決めない）。デザイン/UI/モーション/コピーの方針判断、見た目や体験のトーン決め、画面・コンポーネント設計の前段で必ず参照する。

Applies Chesterton's Fence, Occam's Razor, the Peter Principle, and Dunning-Kruger to technical decisions. Use before refactoring, architectural changes, or any task where changing existing behavior carries risk or requires judgment about what the user actually needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ワーカーから「判断仰ぎます」「承認を仰ぎます」「続行可否」「スコープ拡張提案」 「想定外」「runbook 逸脱」「ブロック / ブロッカー」等の peer message を受信した際、 窓口は一次承認せず人間にエスカレーションする。発動条件は worker からの judgment-escalation / scope-expansion / blocker メッセージ受信時。 通常の進捗 / 完了報告は org-delegate Step 5 (1) / (2a) で扱う。本スキルは 「自己解釈で承認しないための register 更新を含む正準フロー」を担当する。

Use when the user provides multiple options and wants a specific 16-minds (MBTI) personality to make the decision in that personality's judgment style. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「ENTJで決めて」「INFPならどっち選ぶ」「INTJとして判断して」, English equivalents like "decide as ESTJ" / "which would ENFP pick", or 16-minds commands with a `--decide` flag. Requires both a personality and 2+ options to be present or extractable from the request.

Use when the user wants all 16 personality types (16-minds plugin) to vote on a proposal — yes/no/abstain — to see stakeholder distribution, detect hidden objections, or simulate organizational consensus. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「全人格で投票」「16人格に賛否を聞いて」「ステークホルダーシミュ」「これ通せそう？」, English equivalents like "vote with all 16 minds" / "stakeholder simulation", or `--vote` flag on 16-minds commands. Different from /minds (which is for opinion divergence) — this is for binary judgment aggregation.

Delegate writing predictable code to the `code-write` command, which has a cheaper writer model write the target file directly so the generated code never enters your context. Use for tests, scaffolding, fixtures, boilerplate, or a new file that copies an existing pattern, and when the user says "code write", "生成を委譲", or "雛形を書かせて". Do NOT use for design decisions, changes to public contracts or shared modules, edits inside an existing file that needs judgment, or logic with subtle correctness requirements.