「natural selection」の検索結果

侍酒师与葡萄酒 (侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。) Master OS — automated mastery of 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「侍酒师」「sommelier」「葡萄酒」「wine」「盲品」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initiate natural language Q&A through Amazon's storefront Alexa shopping assistant to get shopping guidance answers, recommended product groups, ASIN lists, and follow-up questions. Each call supports only 1 prompt; for follow-ups, the agent must summarize context and concatenate a new question for a new request. A url can be used to supplement Amazon page context. Trigger when the user mentions Amazon Alexa, Alexa shopping assistant, Amazon smart assistant, AI shopping guide, conversational product selection, natural language shopping, Amazon chat Q&A, Amazon Alexa shopping, conversational shopping, AI shopping assistant, follow-up questions, product recommendation conversation, context follow-ups. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Alexa", if their need is to "ask for product recommendations on Amazon using natural language", this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level evolutionary biology covering natural selection, genetic drift, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, speciation, macroevolution, and the modern synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Notion-as-source-of-truth dispatch board for running your work like an AI agency. One Tasks database is the source of truth; tasks flow Suggestion through Discussion, To-Do, In Progress, and Done with subtasks, recurring cadences, dependencies, and template subtrees. Batch execution fans approved To-Do rows out to parallel agents with per-task model selection. Use when capturing chat to Notion, running the To-Do queue, suggesting, approving, or discussing tasks, or coordinating multi-task batches. Trigger with "/agency-os" subcommands or natural-language variants ("add a suggestion: …", "let's discuss X", "run the queue").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate a prompt universe for schema and provenance completeness, target or campaign contamination, evidence entailment, naturalness, one-concept clarity, architecture consistency, aided status, answer leakage, and semantic duplicates. Use after realistic prompt generation and before human panel selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and edits a model-driven Power Apps app from a natural-language intent — tables, columns, relationships, adaptive forms with sub-grids, views, Choice-column charts, business rules, business process flows, generative page intents for overview/dashboard surfaces (page `.tsx` generated in generate-pages after plan approval), and an app module + sitemap — via the headless cds-maker-sdk. Runs an interactive, multi-turn authoring flow (env selection, jobs-to-be-done first, then design-only App Spec authoring across confirmed levels, guardrail lint, plan-mode approval, generate-pages, full build) and a narrated build, and can download a deployed app back into an editable spec to change it. Use when the user says "build an app for X", "create a model-driven app", "make me an app to manage Y", "add a business process flow", or "edit/add to my app". This skill stands alone and does not require /genpage — but for a standalone generative page added to an app that already exists, use /genpage instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and operate production image generation and natural-language image editing with ByteDance Seedream through first-party Volcengine Ark (China) or BytePlus ModelArk (global), including model and region selection, multi-reference and grouped outputs, streaming, secure artifact handling, retries, cost controls, prompting, safety, and rights review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The craft of designing icons that communicate instantly across cultures, contexts, and scales. Icon design bridges semiotics, cognitive psychology, and visual craft to create symbols that users understand without thinking. Great icons are invisible in the best way - they convey meaning so naturally that users never pause to decode them. This skill covers icon grid systems, optical alignment, stroke consistency, metaphor selection, scalability across sizes, SVG optimization, and icon set coherence. The best icon designers understand that icons are a visual language - each icon must speak the same dialect while carrying its own distinct meaning. Use when "icon, iconography, symbol, glyph, icon set, icon library, pictogram, svg icon, icon grid, icon pack, feather icons, lucide, phosphor, heroicons, icon system, icon style, icons, iconography, svg, symbols, glyphs, pictograms, ui-icons, icon-set, visual-design, design-system" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formal oracle for abductive inference that selects the minimal hypothesis best explaining a set of observations. Provides three sub-oracles: MCMC via monad-bayes, Gemini for natural language, and propagator networks for constraint domains. Use when performing hypothesis selection, explaining observations, or solving inference-to-best-explanation problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures FX hedging strategies for international portfolios with natural hedge identification, instrument selection, and cost analysis. Use when managing currency risk, designing FX hedges, or analyzing translation exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects chart patterns in OHLC data from natural-language hypotheses or visual chart selections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Matches natural language task descriptions to appropriate skills using semantic similarity, ranks candidates by fit and performance history, and maintains the skill catalog. Use when assigning skills to DAG nodes, searching for the right skill for a task, ranking competing skills, or browsing the skill catalog. Activate on "find skill", "match skill", "which skill", "skill for this task", "skill catalog", "rank skills", "best skill". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), creating skills (use skill-architect), or grading skills (use skill-grader).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。